bet365 casino bonus newspaper comprehensively reports from foreign media Recently，Lisa Messeri, assistant professor in the Department of Anthropology at Yale University, and Molly Crockett, associate professor in the Department of Psychology at Princeton University, published an article in Nature magazine，Artificial bet365 casino bonus has great potential in improving scientific research productivity，But not without risks。Messerli advocates that researchers remain vigilant when using artificial bet365 casino bonus technology，And discuss how to use artificial bet365 casino bonus tools，Critically evaluate its application。

Scientific researchers are full of expectations for how artificial bet365 casino bonus tools will change the scientific research paradigm。Messery and Crockett divide researchers’ visions of artificial bet365 casino bonus into four main categories。One，In terms of research design，Researchers imagine artificial bet365 casino bonus as a "prediction"，Hope it can search objectively and efficiently、Assess and summarize the vast body of scientific literature，Assist researchers to raise questions during the project design stage。Part 2，In terms of data collection，AI seen as “agent”，Researchers hope it can help generate accurate surrogate data points。For example，When obtaining the data is costly or the collection process faces great difficulties，Researchers can use artificial bet365 casino bonus to replace human participants，Generate similar data。Third，In data analysis，As a "quantitative analysis expert", artificial bet365 casino bonus can handle massive and complex data，Seeking transcendence of human bet365 casino bonus。Fourth，As an “arbiter”, artificial bet365 casino bonus aims to more objectively evaluate the value and reproducibility of scientific research results，Thus assuming the functions of human reviewers in the peer review process。

According to Messerli and Crockett，No matter which of the above four application types the artificial bet365 casino bonus tool belongs to，No scientific researcher should consider it a reliable partner in the production of scientific knowledge，It should be used as a normal tool，Otherwise, researchers may be prone to “misunderstanding”。In other words，Researchers may mistakenly believe that their understanding of the world is more accurate or comprehensive than it actually is。In addition，High performance and insights provided by artificial bet365 casino bonus tools，It may also have a negative impact on scientific knowledge production。Messery and Crockett are worried，With the widespread application of artificial bet365 casino bonus，Researchers are studying the problem、Experimental design and understanding of data and theory will be limited。Such an academic environment can also cause researchers to fall into an "illusion of breadth of exploration"。In other words，Researchers mistakenly believe they are exploring all testable hypotheses，In fact，They are only studying a narrower range of problems that can be tested by artificial bet365 casino bonus tools。

Messery and Crockett pointed out，When universities provide technical training to scientific researchers，Tend to pay more attention to mastering technology，Reflection on the potential social impact of technology has received less attention。If people increasingly believe that artificial bet365 casino bonus tools are more objective than human researchers、Reliable，The scientific community may form a "single culture of knowers" in the future。Under such a scientific research culture，Artificial bet365 casino bonus tools are regarded as extraordinary、Authority、Objective Knower，Gradually replacing people from different backgrounds、Received different training、A diverse scientific community composed of researchers with different professional knowledge。This monoculture can also cause "objective illusion"。This means，Researchers mistakenly believe that artificial bet365 casino bonus tools have no specific perspective or cover all perspectives，In fact，They may represent the position of the computer scientists who developed and trained them。

By analyzing the nature and risks of various artificial bet365 casino bonus research tools，Messery and Crockett provide a framework for advancing responsible knowledge production in the age of artificial bet365 casino bonus。Messerli said，There is a point of view in the scientific community，Considers that the objective observer is the ideal creator of knowledge，But it’s just a myth，Continuing to pursue this myth will only weaken scientific development。There is plenty of evidence，Human diversity makes science stronger、More creative。Crockett thinks，View science as a social practice that benefits from including diverse perspectives，can help researchers realize their full potential。Opposite，Replacing diverse creative perspectives with artificial bet365 casino bonus tools，It would undermine the progress the scientific community has made in incorporating a richer perspective into scientific work。

　(Liu Yuwei/Compiled)