bet365 live casino games Recent，Assistant Professor Lisa Messeri (Lisa Messeri) and Princeton University Associate Professor Molly Crockett in the "Nature" magazine of the Department of Psychology, Princeton University，Artificial intelligence has great potential in improving the productivity of scientific research，but not without risk。Messeri advocates that scientific researchers keep alert when using artificial intelligence technology，and discuss the use of artificial intelligence tools，Evaluation of criticism of its applications。

Scientific researchers are full of expectations for how the artificial intelligence tool will change the scientific research paradigm。Meseri and Crockt divided the scientific researchers' beautiful longing for artificial intelligence into four main categories。One，In terms of research bet365 Play online games design，Researchers imagine artificial intelligence as a "indication"，I hope it can search objectively and efficiently、Evaluate and summarize massive scientific documents，Assist the researchers to ask questions during the design stage。Its two，In terms of data collection，Artificial intelligence is considered "agent"，Researchers hope that it can help generate accurate alternative data points。For example，In the case of high cost consumption of data to obtain data or a lot of difficulties in the collection process，Researchers can use artificial intelligence to replace human participants，Generate similar data。Its three，In terms of data analysis，Artificial intelligence as a "quantitative analysis expert" can process massive and complex data，Seeking transcendence of human intelligence。Four，The artificial intelligence as the "arbiter" aims to more objectively evaluate the value and repeatability of scientific research results，Therefore, the function of human reviewers bet365 Play online games in the peer review process。

Meseri and Crockt thinks，No matter what kind of artificial intelligence tools belong to the above four types of application，Scientific researchers should not consider it as a reliable partner for scientific knowledge，should be used as a normal tool，​​Otherwise, it may make scientific researchers prone to "understanding illusion"。In other words，Researchers may mistakenly think that their understanding of the world is more accurate or comprehensive than the actual situation。other，The efficient and insight provided by artificial intelligence tools，It is also possible that it may have a negative effect on the production of scientific knowledge。Meseri and Crockt are worried，With the widespread application of artificial intelligence，Researchers are studying questions、Experimental design and the understanding of data and theory will be limited。Such an academic environment will also cause scientific researchers to fall into a "illusion of exploring breadth"。That is to say，Bet365 lotto review Researchers mistakenly believe that they are exploring all testable assumptions，In fact，They are just studying problems that can be tested by artificial intelligence tools。

Meseri and Crockt pointed out，When a college is conducting technical training on scientific researchers，Often pay more attention to the mastery of technology，Reflection on the potential social impact on technology is less concerned。If people are more and more believed that artificial intelligence tools are more objective than human researchers、Reliable，The scientific community will may form a "single culture of the knowledge" in the future。Under such a scientific research culture，Artificial intelligence tools are regarded as extraordinary、authority、Objective insider，Gradually replaced from different backgrounds、I have received different training、Diversified scientific communities composed of scientific researchers who master different professional knowledge。This single culture can also cause bet365 best casino games "objective illusion"。This means，Scientific Bet365 lotto review Researchers mistakenly believe that artificial intelligence tools do not have a specific perspective or cover all perspectives，and actually，They may represent the position of computer researchers who develop and train them。

By analyzing the nature and risks of various artificial intelligence research tools，Meseri and Crockt provided a framework for the production of responsible knowledge in the era of artificial intelligence。Meseri said，There is a point of view in the scientific community，I think objective observer is the ideal creator of knowledge，But this is just a myth，Continue to pursue this myth will only weaken scientific development。There are a lot of evidence to indicate，Human diversity makes science stronger、More creative。Crockt thinks，Care science as a social practice that benefits from containing a diverse view，It can help scientific researchers give full play to their potential。On the contrary，Replace bet365 Play online games the diverse creative perspective with artificial intelligence tools，It will destroy the progress made by the scientific community in incorporated the richer perspective into the scientific work。

　(Liu Yuwei/Compilation)