bet365 best casino games According to the official website of "World University News"，A literature review on the use of university ranking data in research assessment and Research Excellence Schemes，The vast majority of scholars believe that relevant data or ranking results should not be used to formulate research evaluations or guide policies。However，It is not easy to translate this academic consensus into practical actions to abandon rankings。

Relevant research is mainly based on English and Russian documents in the Web of Science index，Considering that university rankings played a key role in the implementation of Russia’s “5-100” plan，Therefore, Russia is mainly used as the research object。The rankings involved bet365 live casino games in the study include the QS World University Rankings、THE World University Rankings、CWTS Leiden University Ranking、Multi-dimensional global university rankings, etc.。

Research findings，Most academic articles on university rankings and their use in research evaluation are critical of them，And this is mainly because there are 5 problems related to university rankings。Including technical errors in the ranking method，Lack of transparency and reproducibility in rankings; incomplete coverage of university performance indicators; geographical and linguistic bias; risk of losing the national and organizational identity of higher education; conflicts of interest。Take conflict of interest as an example，Research points out，Global university rankings are mostly compiled by profit-seeking organizations，These organizations sell additional data to universities、Services and other types of subscription bet365 live casino games content to earn revenue。

Research findings，The rankings of 28 Russian universities that have signed a consulting service contract with a company for 2016-2021 have improved，According to relevant statistical data，The performance of these universities in various aspects is not enough to support their ranking improvement。Therefore，The study concluded that，University ranking itself is a bias。

The study mentioned when discussing the complexity of change，Many people uncritically view rankings as a measure of a university’s quality and reputation。Therefore，A university’s refusal to participate in rankings poses serious reputational risks。However, some universities have begun to take measures，Plus the constant criticism from academic circles，Has forced ranking compilers to start improving ranking methods。Researchers think，In contexts involving research evaluation and policy initiatives，The discussion about rankings bet365 Play online games and their use involves more than just ranking compilers and universities，It also involves a large number of academics and governments，Need someone who can work in person、Organization、A framework for collective action at national and global levels。Rejection of rankings goes beyond legal or political aspects，Could be a culture change，Involving changes in the ideas and habits of a society or a specific group，It is a very complex question，The use of university rankings in research assessment should therefore be progressively rejected。

However, researchers also mentioned，A few articles favor the use of university rankings in research assessments or are neutral。One study suggests，Ruanke Academic Ranking of World Universities is a transparent tool for assessing research performance，Because this ranking is completely based on objective data。Another study suggests，Given the backward-looking nature of research performance Bet365 lotto review measures，The best method and indicator selection for Ranke World University Academic Ranking。

Researchers have made some suggestions，Including stopping evaluating academic results based on university ranking indicators，Reward faculty and researchers for their contributions in various fields; stop basing university development strategies on university rankings，Do not use ranking results in management decision analysis reports，Focus instead on the actual contribution of the university，Included in Science、Research results in education and society; stop evaluating universities based on ranking indicators，Every university has its unique mission，Only completing this mission is what truly matters; stop using ranking information for national strategy，Only universities should be considered for their contribution to national and global goals; stop paying fees to ranking compilers for consulting services。

(Lian Zhixian/Compiled)