In recent years，Scientific research influence has become increasingly becoming a hot topic in the academic world，and start to "penetrate" in the field of public policy formulation。But，Many academic personnel、Policy makers and the public's understanding of the influence of scientific research is not clear。Recent，The reporter's definition of the influence of scientific research、How to determine issues such as scientific research influence，Julie Bayley, director of Lincoln University, is responsible for the development of scientific research influence development business。

　Bet365 app download

"Journal of Social Sciences of China": What is the basic definition of scientific research influence?

Bailey:Simply speaking，Scientific research influence can be defined as the result of scientific research results outside the academic world、The benefits that can be proven，is caused by scientific research or being promoted by scientific research and in society、Economy、What happened in the environment、Changes that people can see。This does not mean that scientific research is the only cause of influence or spawning，Instead, it means that scientific research has played a clear、Obviously different from other factors to promote the role。The types and ways of scientific research influence are diverse，The scale of scientific research influence can be large or small。"The role of non -academic personnel" is the most critical feature of the influence of scientific research。What needs to be explained is，The "scientific research influence" mentioned here is different from traditional academic influence evaluation indicators。The former reflects changes in the real world，The latter reflects the reputation of a study in the academic world、status、Impact on other scholars。The principle of emphasizing the influence of scientific research should not destroy academic rigor and excellence。And，The pursuit of enhancing the influence of scientific research will also be supported by the relevant changes within the academic world，If you are open to access、Call for "responsible indicators"、Critical discussion of the ranking of colleges and universities。

　　"Journal of Social Sciences of China": What methods do academic personnel usually show and prove the influence of scientific research? Are these methods limit?

Bailey:Since the influence of scientific research refers to the impact of scientific research results on the real world，Any method to collect non -academic insights can be used to display and prove the influence of scientific research，In practice, the combination of qualitative feedback and quantitative data is generally used。For example，Collect personal、Group、Enterprise or other stakeholders issued、Certificate on how a study helps them help them; conduct investigations and interviews; obtain relevant profits from the enterprise or service provider、Data from service quality or other changes。Prove that the influence of scientific research has no gold standard，The key is that the qualitative or quantitative data used must be true、Accurate，And this data shows actual rather than fake changes。Any method of evaluating the influence of scientific research is limited，Just like any method of evaluating the research itself is beneficial to disadvantages。Quantitative method is extremely effective for displaying the influence of scientific research，But it is easy to ignore whether the scientific research results have positive or negative value; the qualitative method can more comprehensively describe the benefits of scientific research results，But when the changes in the digital level brought by the scientific research results to the economy and business，Performance may be insufficient。Many "responsible indicators" advocate believes that "being able to measure does not mean important，Important does not mean to be measured "。The best way to prove the influence of scientific research is to examine what may happen or have already happened，and select the most appropriate comprehensive measurement standard。

　　Cultivate scientific research influence literacy

"China Social Sciences": Is it necessary for today's academic personnel to receive "scientific research influence training"，To understand why the influence of scientific research is important、How to maximize the influence of scientific research?

Bailey:This is necessary。Need training is not because academic personnel know nothing about scientific research，but because they lack enough opportunities to form "scientific research influence literacy"。Scientific research influence is not a natural product of research，You need to work hard to establish a connection、Communicate，will be generated。Academic personnel are experts in their respective fields，But because of this, it is expected that their research will trigger unrealistic social changes，Unreasonable。If academic personnel do not understand what the influence of scientific research is、Why is it important、How to achieve，It is not in the initial stage of research to integrate scientific research influence in research，So for them，Raising the influence of scientific research will be a difficulty、laborious "extra" task。So，We need to help them form "scientific research influence literacy"。

When emphasizing the importance of the influence of scientific research，You must pay attention to a difference。Whether scientific research should help improve society、To solve social problems? Absolutely should。Should all scientific research have a "tangible" effect? bet365 best casino games Should not。The relationship between scientific research and influence is sometimes simple and clear，Sometimes it is complex，It is unrealistic to generate direct social benefits to expect basic or exploratory research。The theoretical research of any discipline is unlikely to be directly transformed into social benefits，The nature of its high conceptualization determines that the relevant results are difficult to obtain directly。Requirement of this type of research is directly impact and does not fair。Of course，This does not mean to be engaged in the basic、Scholars who exploratory research do not need to pay attention to influence，They also have the responsibility to make their research be known by those who can associate them with the real world，For example, scholars engaged in application research in the same field。Over the years，Study on scientific research influence while carrying out、Experience in your own professional research work，Make me know very clearly，Make the influence of scientific research a effective way to become a special field，It is to help academic personnel to locate my research under the framework of scientific research -what can my research be provided、What is created? How to study in further research、Application and non -academic cooperation to increase influence?

　　Journal of China Social Sciences: Is the current digital age conducive to the creation of and displaying scientific research influence in academic personnel?

Bailey:Digital era is undoubtedly beneficial to the influence of scientific research。Digital technology shorten the distance between researchers and potential users，Bring three important advantages: communication、Master evidence、Cultivate skills and build interpersonal networks。First，Social media provides a new way of creative ways to communicate and propagate scientific research results。Scientific researchers can start faster with their peers、More direct discussion，Form a practical network，Touch the more vast number of people，Breaking the barriers between the academic circles and other areas of society。This will make scholars know more about social change。but but，You must remember，The attention obtained through social media is not the same as the influence of scientific research。2，Digital technology to survey、Policy analysis and other evidence collection methods are more convenient，Help to prove the influence of scientific research。third，Academic personnel can use digital technology tools，Participation aimed at improving scientific research influence literacy、Master the activity of related skills，Create contact with influential communities worldwide，Including academic personnel、Research Manager、Non -academic experts、Scientific research funding institution、Government staff, etc., will "make changes" as the person with a mission。

　Effectively improving scientific research activities

"China Social Sciences": Can the scientific research influence agenda promote scientific research progress and knowledge popularization?

Bailey:Yes，But this is not to simply add the scientific research influence on the traditional academic expectation。Under the scientific research culture driven by literature metering，Make academic personnel enthusiastically accept the concept of scientific research influence. The concept may be extremely difficult。The pursuit of the influence of scientific research should be reflected in the establishment of such a scientific research ecosystem: the effort to recognize the creation of scientific research，Make cooperation and co -production may be possible，Focus shifts from traditional standards to measure academic achievements to more tolerance、More meaningful standards to measure the benefits other than academic。Under ideal circumstances，Scientific research influence is deeply embedded in the research process，It is the common goal of everyone participating in the research，instead of another pressure or competition。Only academic personnel act together with non -academic personnel，Follow the benefits of solving social problems rather than difficulties，Knowledge is possible to include the public。If you want to cultivate positive scientific research influence culture，Scientific research institutions must think about how to recognize and promote the scientific research influence agenda，instead of just put those researchers with the "largest" scientific research influence under the spotlight。

　"Journal of China Social Sciences": Cooperate with individuals or institutions outside the academic world to enhance the risk of the influence of scientific research?

Bailey:Cooperation in the academic world is important for the formation of the influence of scientific research，This can help academic personnel judge what kind of scientific research influence is possible、What are the best ways to produce it。From the eyes of many scholars，Especially the scholars who have just been used in the concept of scientific research or the incompatibility of research content，Cooperation with non -academic personnel has the risk of deviating scientific research activities from "pure science"。but，If the operation is proper，Combining academic rigor with the opinions of the stakeholders，The road to scientific research influence will be more effectively improved rather than "dilution" scientific research activities。