Current，There is a phenomenon of fierce competition in academic positions in the academic community。This leads to the academic output link that the academic policy makers of colleges and universities can make scholars stand out in the ranking，Therefore, the input link required before the publication of academic works，For example, the evaluation link of the same line。November 10，Dirk Lindebaum, a senior professor of the Grarner Higher Business School in Gleoro, France, and Peter Jordan, a professor of behavior professor of organizational behavior at the University of Greeis University in Australia, British "Thames Higher Education" magazine website posted a document，Over focusing on the final academic achievement and ignoring the peer review method，Make the peer review system facing development dilemma。The reporter interviewed the relevant scholars on the problems of the current peer evaluation system and how to improve。

　bet365 best casino games

Following points in the academic world are mainly concentrated on academic achievements。Linden Bomham said，The incentive measures bet365 live casino games formulated by colleges and universities include: to provide rewards for scholars who publish articles in well -known journals and reduce teaching burdens。The consequences of this policy are，Although some scholars publish work frequency are getting higher and higher，The willingness bet365 live casino games to participate in peer reviews is getting lower and lower。Some academic journal editors even need to issue a dozen invitation letters，Only to succeed in about two reviewers。

Associate Professor of Psychology, Norwegian School of Business, Adrian Furnham (Adrian Furnham) take personal work experience as an example，Tell the pressure faced by peer review。He was asked to review 53 papers in September this year。Suppose each paper takes 3 hours to complete，Accept the above review request will occupy more than 150 hours。This reflects the amazing growth of the number of academic journals over the past 20 years，The core role of publication in academic assessment。Editors of most well -known journals hope to have at least 2-4 experts to evaluate papers，But it is difficult for them。

Ferham said，Because it is difficult to find enough reviewers，Many academic journals edit recommendations Thesis authors recommend related reviewers。This method allows scholars to adhere to the mentality of supporting each other bet365 live casino games to participate in peer review，That is, "I actively review your thesis，You should do this to me "。

The lack of reviewers will cause two negative effects。Linden Baym further analysis，On the one hand，Some positive and enthusiastic scholars are still willing to participate in the evaluation work，Provide feedback to other colleagues。But when the number of reviewers is limited，This will inevitably reduce the time it is used for research and writing，thus affecting their results publication and career development。If they choose，may lead to fatigue and burnout。On the other hand，When a large number of papers involved in various types can only be completed by limited judges，The peer reviews that are not completely opposed to the professional cannot point out the professional errors or make improvement opinions。Another，Insufficient quantity of the reviewer will also make it difficult for them to make judgments on the level of research results，Therefore, the progress of discipline knowledge is limited。

　　Inspirational measures to be improved

Associate Professor Michael Brown, an associate professor at the School of Physics and Astronomy, Monash University in Australia, said in an interview with this reporter，Because peer evaluation work is usually anonymous and there is no cost，Therefore, experts and scholars devote themselves to the Bet365 app download power of such work limited。Brown sometimes assumes peer review，He does this mainly for the interests of the academic community，But some scholars may lack this kind of altruistic spirit。So，There should be better incentive measures to promote scholars bet365 live casino games to participate in peer review。

Letting scholars sacrifice the spare time to participate in the peer evaluation without compensation，It seems difficult to be widely recognized。Ferham Suggestion，The process of peer evaluation is more professional through payment to pay more professional。For example，Some free reviewers may make some trivial、Rheo or obvious error comment，But in the case of payment，Edit can ask the reviewer's evaluation content to reach a certain standard。Of course，Can we improve the peer evaluation system by paying for remuneration，Also consider how much payment is paid、How to pay for the length or difficulty of the content of the review。

Some colleagues from Ferham also expressed different opinions on the way of paying for pay.。Someone is worried，Some scholars will take the evaluation work as the main business，and produce a feeling better than other scholars，Criticize some research that does not meet its own world view。Some people are worried，Payment rewards will make the journal more chosen from the economic perspective，bet365 best casino games instead of considerations in the professional field。

　Explore the diverse path

Confirmation of psychological research，Economic incentives have limited influence on groups with relatively high income。So，Jordan recommends starting from three aspects，Multi -dimensional improvement peer review system。First，Journal must establish the correct incentive mechanism for the reviewer。To recognize the importance of peer review，Also inspired the reviewer by setting a prize。For example，Set the "Best Commentor" award，The winners have the opportunity to occupy a place in the editorial committee。other，Periodicals can also set special awards for junior reviewers and provide relevant guidance plans。

2，Leading the role model。Scholar，Especially senior scholars，Don’t just do "publishing machine" that focuses on research，To act with examples, encourage students and junior colleagues to participate in the entire research process including peer reviews。Scholars should actively discuss the rewards brought by the review，For example, you can master new research on research in your professional field at any time、Can make your own contribution to the development of the discipline。

But，To achieve the above two points，University must completely reform its own management system，Pursue the "fanatic" of bet365 Play online games academic publications，Converted into a more collective -oriented target。From this，Jordan quoted the third suggestion，That is, the peer review must become part of the university quality evaluation。Ranking is very important，It can become a driving force for the reform of the university management system。But the key point is，To incorporate the appropriate factors into the ranking link，including peer review。The rise of the peer evaluation certification platform will help promote this process，This type of platform can convert academic evaluation work into quantified outputs，At the same time, it can help the editor better understand、Management and improvement review process。

other，Ferham introduced some methods for improving peer reviews。For example，Some scholars suggest that university formulate relevant policies，Make all scholars must participate in peer reviews，and incorporate it into the annual assessment; editors can be based on simple standards such as the clarity and usefulness of the evaluation，Rating the reviewers; retirees can also be used as a supplementary force for peer reviews。