Scientific knowledge is production、There are many uncertain factors in the process of application and popularization，Give scientific research、Decision and communication brings challenges。In the post -epidemic era，How to guide people to face the uncertainty of scientific research，Based on this, advocate science、Improve scientific literacy、Maintaining scientific credibility，This reporter interviewed a number of foreign scholars on the above issues。

　bet365 Play online games

The scientific research process itself is full of uncertainty，Even the quantitative research of "speaking with data" is no exception。The cross -border team represented by Martin Schweinsberg, a assistant professor at the German Academy of Management and Technology, is represented by Martin Schweinsberg. The Decision Process was published in "The same data，Different conclusions: The paper of the high degree of empirical results when independent analysts operate and test the same assumptions。Shi Weinis Pogg told reporters，This study mainly shows the importance of the subjective choice of researchers in data analysis，How to bet365 live casino games guide different statistical methods to different conclusions。For example，When verifying the "higher professional scientific researcher who speaks more at the work conference", the hypothesis，Professional status may be symbolized into professional titles、Scientific research results are drawn、Different variables or variable combinations such as the ownership industry，How many speeches may also be defined as the number or number of words of the speech。Schweinens Pog said，Researchers can explore the same academic problem in a differentiated way，Even if they are based on the same data and do not deliberately seek a specific conclusion，Results may still generate differentiation。

further research or practice on the basis of existing research results，Have uncertainty。James R. Bailey, a professor of leadership Development, George Washington University in the United States, told reporters，Science embrace hope、It has an important position in the journey of welcome the challenge。People expect science to bring more certainty in the uncertain world。But，Many times，This is not easy。For example，In the past for a period of time，Comments on the epidemic of new crown pneumonia、Report、Research projects, etc.，However，Either he found that there are defects。In the gap between scientific research and scientific practice，Bet365 lotto review The information that has been grasped is not obvious in real significance、It is difficult to transform from theoretical to action and other problems。Berry thinks，This gap needs to be further bridged，Only can science better serve human society。

At the same time，Scientific research work will be political、Economic and other external factors restrictions。This is also an uncertainty of scientific research。Dan Hicks, a professor of philosophy at the University of California, Merysted, introduced in an interview with reporters，US regulatory environment pollution、The authority of administrative institutions in the fields of drugs traditionally comes from such a concept: science can provide political neutral professional knowledge。How about the political opinion of a person，can and should be accepted "what science tells us"。But the problem lies in，Scientific research related to policy is not completely determined or completely neutral。Because scientific research results can be used to support objection policies，People who oppose certain policies have motivated to question science，They will excavate even small uncertainty，Use to ignore the research conclusion。For example，Some practitioners in the US fossil fuel industry have bought influential scientists，Let them act as the role of "suspect businessman"，Public challenge climate science。

　　Enhanced the openness of scientific research

Facing uncertainty of scientific research，How to make research more credible、Make decisions more reasonable、Let science be more trustworthy? Scholars from the scholars from scientific research、Scientific decision -making and scientific communication gives suggestions。

First，The frontline scientific researchers must ensure the quality of scientific research results。From the view of Berry，Editors of researchers and academic journals are the creators of scientific knowledge and the Guanren，Driven the heavy responsibility of reducing the disadvantages of scientific research。Scientific researchers must work hard to practice the best practice，Make science more open、、Appropriate，Let the public believe that science can provide certainty to a certain extent，Help people better live in the uncertain world。Schweinens Pog said，The research he participated in highlighting the enhancement of data opening in scientific research、Perform the stability test of the system and the importance of the analytical path adopted and not adopted，to ensure that scientific research results are as accurate as possible。

Associate Professor Rik Peels, an associate professor at the University of Amsterdam, the University of Amsterdam, Dutch.。He admits to reporters，He does not agree，Because most people still believe Bet365 lotto review in the truth。Picis proposed，To strengthen the trust of science among the academic circles and more public，and replication is important to enhance the credibility of scientific research results，When the result cannot be copied，Will weaken the credibility of the original research。He said，Copy and different degrees of original research credibility can be divided into three types: reproduction，Use the original research scheme and original data; repeat it directly，Use the same research solution and new data; conceptual repeat，Use modified research solutions and new data。where，The success of conceptual repeat research is the most credible credibility，It can prove that the original result is correct or very close to the facts。

Next，Scientific Researchers、Policy maker、Related industries should properly respond to uncertainty of scientific research。Hicks recommends the adaptive management law，This management method was originally developed in the field of wild animals and forestry management。Like an ecosystem，Science is also constantly self -improvement。The concept of adaptability management method is a flexible virtuous cycle，First use the existing highest level of science to design policies，Reuse policy to test and improve science，Then improve the policy based on the improved scientific knowledge。Shi bet365 Play online games Weinis Bog advocated the scientific research results of all parties in the exchange report，and apply it to the organization decision，To maintain a humble and cautious attitude。

Last，To guide the public to eliminate potential misunderstandings about scientific research，Enhance the trust of scientific knowledge。From the view of Berry，The pursuit of the accuracy of scientific research is the best way to bridge the gap between science and practice。Pierce said，Many scientific researchers are often using the possibility and inference to seek the best explanation。To make the public understand this better，The key is to spread the philosophy and ethics knowledge about science to the academic and the general public。For example，The difference between cutting -edge science and textbook science is，The former involves the latest research and preliminary scientific research results，More uncertainty，For example, the research and development of new drugs; the latter is the theory that has experienced numerous methods in different methods and different methods in different fields，closer to the concept that is closer to，For example, evolution theory。

Science is not a static truth，It is not a flawless conclusion，Instead, they are in dynamic development with human society。Uncertainty of scientific research，Only can science better serve human society。