In the history of the annotation of "Lao Tzu" in history，Say different。For "Lao Tzu" "Tao Ke Tao，Very Tao "a word，Although the Gong of the river appears、Li Rong、Sima Guang and other ingenious explanations，But the mainstream view is "the Tao cannot be said"。Ma Wangdui's book "Lao Tzu" and Peking University's "Lao Tzu" were discovered，Scholars have written to correct the "Tao Unable to Said" theory，Try to restore the original meaning of Lao Tzu's "Taoism"。But there is a phenomenon worth noting，That is, the "Tao Unspeakable" theory did not appear in the comments of "Lao Tzu" in the earlier notebook，Instead, it appeared in the works of "Han Feizi" and "Huainanzi".。If "Han Feizi" is still in the name of "solving the old"，intentionally to obey the meaning of "Lao Tzu"，Then the explanation in "Huainanzi" is mostly unilaterally unconscious。Because "Huainanzi" is not specifically explained the work of "Lao Tzu"，but just expressing opinions、Quoting "Lao Tzu" shows some kind of understanding of the sentence "Lao Tzu"。

"Huainanzi" involves three places involving "Tao Ke Tao，Very Tao "，See three articles in "Book of Books", "Dao Ying", "Pan theory"。where，"Book of Books" and "Pan theory" are used as "Host Taoist Tao，Very Road。Name can be named，Very famous "" Hosting Taoist，Very Tao also "，Not appearing in the form of quoting the original text。Only "Old Tzu said:" Tao Ke bet365 live casino games Dao，Very Road。Name can be named，Very name '"。This quotation is followed by the dialogue between the Gong Gong and the Charian in the "Zhuangzi · Tiandao" quoted by this article，with the following quotes:

Gong Gong reads in the hall，Wheel Run Run under the hall，Shi Qi's vertebral chisel and asked the Grandpa: "Reader of Junzhi，He Shuye? "Gong Gong said:" The book of the sage。"The Wheel Bian said:" Is it a person? "Gong Gong said:" It's dead。"The wheel Bian said:" It is the sage of the straight sage! "Grandpa's natural color and anger said:" Widow reads，Workers are sneer! If you say it, you can，Die if you don't say。"Wheel flat said:" Ran，Say。The charm of the minister's rotation: the big disease，​​It is bitter but not in; Da Xu，is sweet but not solid。Uncomfortable，Should be in hand，Disdish heart，and can be so good，Chen cannot be the son of the teaching minister，The son of the minister can not get it to the minister。is 70 for the year，Old and wheel。The person where the saints speak today，Also Huaiqi Bao，Poor death，The dross is in the ear! Therefore, Lao Tzu said: ‘Taoist Tao，Very Road。Name can be named，Very name '。”

You can see，This text is a patchwork for the two texts of "Zhuangzi" and "Lao Tzu"，The purpose is to demonstrate the view of the "Unbearable Tao" held by the author of "Huainanzi"。Beyond the text of "Lao Tzu"，The pre -Qin sons hold the "Tao Unspeakable" theory with a tube、Zhuangzi, etc.。where，The most well -known is Zhuangzi's point of view。Zhuangzi opposes cognitiveism，Think that speaking will lead to distinction，Then cause argument，So advocate "Avenue Nothing，A debate Bet365 app download "，Promote "Making Mars"。Zhuangzi's words became a scholarly expressed aspiration、The theoretical basis for appreciating art。It can be said，In the spirit of ancient Chinese literati, there is a strong Zhuangzi color in the spirit of the literati，The background color of this color is the meaning of "endless words"。

Whether in the discussion structure，Still on the purpose of discussion，This text in Huainanzi is directly displayed directly，"Lao Tzu" text is used to illustrate the text of the text of "Zhuangzi"。This impression is: the truth of this "unspeakable Tao" described by Chao Bian is Lao Tzu's thoughts。So，The meaning of the unspeakable "Tao" in "Zhuangzi" is added on the "Tao" of "Lao Tzu"，To the "Tao" of "Lao Tzu", the unspeakable impression of "Lao Tzu"。This text appearing in "Huainanzi" reflects the author's understanding of the two texts of "Zhuangzi" and "Lao Tzu"，But the author's understanding of these two texts is not synchronized。Specifically，This text is the author's understanding of "Lao Tzu" when he understands "Zhuangzi"，The understanding of Lao Tzu has been knowledgeable、Conceptization，This kind of knowledge or concept becomes the resource that the author can use "Huainanzi" at any time when thinking。When this resource is used，It often manifested as the classification of the scriptures，In the form of "as a certain say", the text that is understood is attracted into the pre -structure of the understander's knowledge。But，There is more than one front structure。What kind of front structure should be continued，It is caused by the understanding of the understanding of the understand。This means bet365 best casino games that the appearance of the front structure has a tendency to adapt to the external understanding object，The front structure should appear for the understanding object，The emergence of the front structure is different from the understanding of the understander。That's for this，The seemingly natural quotation is based on the actual practice of the classics、Practical。

Western interpretation has appeared in the "interpretation" and "over-interpretation" of Aiko and Roboti。This dispute made us see，The interpretation of pragmatism will bring relativeism of text interpretation。The reason why this controversy happened，As the controversy is consciously implementing a systematic system -based interpretation ideas。Therefore，Interpreter of Practical Interpretation of Academic Thought，Before understanding, I have regarded the text as a tool I used for me。For the interpreter，The text is ready -made; interpretation of text depends on some prominent purpose，This purpose is also ready -made; compared to，Classic tools、A practical quotation based on the Code，The consciousness of using the interpretation of practicalism has not been achieved by the interpretation of the text。The classics are not forced to explain the classics with a downward attitude，and it is precisely because of the belief in classic。During the understanding process，The classic "Come to Rescue the Field"。The understander is not dominated by the interpreter of practicalism，But calling text。The understanding of the classic text as a Guiyi, although brought the classic to the new Bet365 app download understanding experience，But the classics that were called did not participate in the new understanding of the dialogue。From the perspective of the understander，The unshakable classic becomes a new attachment of understanding experience in the process of being called。Brief words，The former classic is now just a "physical evidence"。

From this to the book "Huainanzi"，The author has repeatedly involved "Tao Ke Tao，Very Tao "，Explain that "the Tao cannot be said" is not an occasional imagination of the author，Instead, the author often uses the text of "Lao Tzu" as the basis for discussion。Quoting "Lao Tzu" explaining "Zhuangzi" is not "with Lao Jiezhuang"，Instead, it has caused the consequences of "solving the old with the old"。The reason is，Quoting Code This behavior itself is a process that abstracts classic sentences，The quoted sentence quoted from the overall context of the text it is，Become a text that can cover other texts、Universal meaning that can be involved in other understanding activities。The phrase from the context lost the containment of the context meaning，Become an unsuccessful、Object of understanding without border，This also makes the interpretation space of this sentence greater。When the understander stitch it with the words in another text，The result is not the general meaning of abstract sentences covering the new text，Instead, it leads to the new text "annexation" of abstract sentences，Because abstract sentences need to obtain its specific existence form，It desires to "be swallowed"。Abstract sentences gained a new context、New definition，"Taoist Tao，Very Tao "bet365 best casino games what does it mean in" Lao Tzu "，The key is that it can be used to explain "Zhuangzi"。Cited Scripture Code no longer considers "how the author says"，Instead, "How do I understand it"，Passive "Calling the Classic" is also actively "bringing the classics to the present"。In this process，Classic authors no longer have ownership of the work、Interpretation right，The author has been hidden。Western interpretation of the controversy of "the author is dead" is a pre -judgment before understanding，The author becomes the object of the reader's trial，Even the reader who claims that "the author can't die"，In fact, the inequality of the author and the reader has been preset。Dested，The author's "death" and "living" are not pre -discussion、Judged，Instead, "dead and alive" during the reader's understanding process。When the author of "Huainanzi" is only facing the text of "Lao Tzu"，He doesn't think "this is what Lao Tzu said"，Even when he does a new understanding activity，It may be passively called "Lao Tzu said" to provide support，But his call itself、Quoting the scriptures itself has caused "the death of Lao Tzu" and "Zhuangzi's life"，And when he quotes "Zhuangzi" in another occasion，Why not cause Zhuangzi's death?

Quotation of the Based on the Code not only leads to the death of the author，and the openness it brings is not the openness of the text as a whole，but the abstraction and floating of the individual sentences of the text，These sentences will be put into a closed context after all，Become a new text that is not open。So，What people see in "Huainanzi" can only be arranged by the author、bet365 live casino games Unspecked "Tao" fully discussed by Zhuangzi，instead of "Tao"。Lao Tzu's "Tao Ke Tao，Very Taoism "just changed，Guizhuangzi has everything。

　　bet365 Play online games