"The NON-IDentity Privem" was first proposed by the famous British contemporary philosopher Derek Parfit,，This problem constitutes a challenge for the idea of ​​the interests of human beings for the interests of future generations。From Pafit's view，Future descendants have extraordinary sex，Even if the contemporary people make the future world worse，Contemporary people have not made the life of anyone worse in the future。In the ecological ethics vision，"Questions of the same sex" is also known as "the problem of the beneficiary's disappearance"。But，Ecological Protection Action、Ecological civilization construction skills are contemporary，Li in Qianqiu，The public can generally reach consensus。Especially in recent years，Global extreme climatic phenomenon frequency，Europe is facing severe drought，Asia、North America、Africa encounters high temperature heat waves in many places，A rare low temperature appears in the southern hemisphere，Ecological crisis、Climate change and other issues have become increasingly increasingly concerned about the public。These ecological issues warn that humans should harmonize with nature，and using nature、In the process of developing nature, we must achieve the same as contemporary people，Not satisfied with the descendants' needs to cause damage。

Bet365 lotto review  

Puffett explained "extraordinary Bet365 app download problems" by imagining a specific case。Suppose a young woman wants to have a child，But now her conditions are not perfect，If she chooses to give birth to a child now，So what she can provide to this child will be a bad starting point of life。If this woman chooses to wait for a few years to have children，Then she will have a "different" child，Give this child a better starting point of life。Different choices will lead to different future generations，This is the simple version of the "extraordinary problems" of future descendants。

Thinking of logic，In the ecological ethics vision，We can imagine two situations。The first situation is that contemporary people choose to consume a lot of resources、Destroy the environment and other behaviors，Specific individual X will meet y to meet Y，Generate specific offspring A。The second situation is that contemporary people choose to save resources、Protecting the environment and other behaviors，Lifetime of contemporary people、Method of getting along will change，Specific individual X no longer know Y life with Y，Instead of knowing life with Z，Generate specific offspring B。From Pafit's view，Consumer a lot of resources、Destroy the environment and save resources、Protecting the environment is two choices for contemporary people。In the first case，Contemporary people choose to consume a lot of resources、Destroy the environment and other behaviors，But for future generation A，It did not hurt its interests。Although the future A is in the shortage of resources、Life under the condition of environmental bet365 Play online games pollution，But he lives better than him under harsh conditions。If contemporary people choose to save resources、Protecting the environment and other behaviors，In the second case，Then the future generations will not be descendants A but offspring B，"Beneficial" -il descendants A "missing"。Under the assumption of different production development models，Future offspring will be completely different groups。So，According to this inference logic，Even if contemporary people choose to consume a lot of resources、Destroy the environment and other behaviors，But in the end, it did not become worse for specific offspring，They should not blame the contemporary people to destroy the ecological environment，Because they can at least appear in this world，Their existence itself has value and meaning。Otherwise，There will be "different" future descendants to replace them。It can even be said，Contemporary people choose to consume a lot of resources、Development model that destroys the environment not only does not hurt future descendants，Instead, I did something that is good for them。No matter what kind of development model of contemporary people choose，It is nothing to do for specific offspring。

response to "non -the same sex" 

"Non -the same sexual problems" conflict with the public's ecological environmental protection consensus，Especially for the interests of human beings should challenge the interests of future descendants，Many scholars respond to this，Defense for the consensus of ecological ecology and intergenerational ethics。

On the one hand，The harmful consequences caused by human behavior may be Bet365 app download compensated，but，Damage is damage，The damage itself will not disappear。American scholar John Nolt thinks，Even if people can agree with the so -called different situations of Puffett, they will definitely produce different descendants.，But Puffet's understanding of the consequences of human behavior is obviously too simple。Nort pointed out，The consequences of a specific behavior can be considered separately。His example，A person accidentally hurt your arm，Later, compensate you one million US dollars，So for you，In fact, it is not worse than when your arm is not injured。But，Even after receiving high compensation, your life status is worse than when the arm is not injured，But this does not mean that it is not a damage to you to hurt your arm。It is obviously a damage for you to hurt your arm，Although high compensation can largely make up for your damage to you，But this is another thing，The damage to you did not disappear because of this。The same situation in the ecological ethics vision is the same，Contemporary people choose to consume a lot of resources、Destroy the environment，It can make future generation A born。For future generation A，Compared to him, it is impossible to be born in the second case，He can be born in the first case、Growth、Life，Although he needs to live in the shortcomings of resources、Under the conditions of environmental pollution，But he can live in this world like a high compensation，He even has a "benefit"。But，Let the future A birth and let the offspring A are short of resources、Under the conditions of environmental pollution, life should be considered separately，Let the offspring bet365 best casino games A in the shortage of resources、Under the conditions of environmental pollution, life is essentially a harm for future generation A。

On the other hand，Some scholars have proposed the differences that should distinguish between individuals and collective "non -the same sexual problems"。The "extraordinary problem" at the individual level has certain rationality，If a woman chooses to give birth at different times, she will indeed give birth to different children，Children cannot choose their birth environment，Even the bad birth environment，But the growth life later lies in its own subjective efforts，And the child can have life than to the choice of this woman at the time。So，Women's fertility choices make no matter when specific children are not bad for specific children。but，The "extraordinary problem" at the collective level is controversial，A couple gave birth to a child in a acquaintance due to destruction of the environment，This specific child may not complain about the behavior of his parents，But the effect of destroying the environment and other behaviors is not just a child，Other people’s children will also suffer damage。So，Even if we do not deny that "non -the same sexual problem" is reasonable to a certain extent，But it can only be limited to the individual level，Cannot extend to the collective level。An important issue of ecological ethics is the responsibility and obligation of each individual to the collective living environment of future descendants。Therefore，In the ecological ethics vision，"Non -the same sexual problems" cannot deny the damage caused by acting as the acting of the environment to the environment such as bet365 Play online games the destruction of the environment，It is not possible to think about the interests of human beings for the interests of future generations.。

To sum up，Human behavior pursues not only the needs of contemporary people，At the same time, we must also consider the interests of future descendants，Such a claim should be recognized。Our understanding of future descendants should adopt a historical、Specific、Contact views，Pay attention to the continuous and overlapping between generations，Not isolated、Static look at intergenerational relations，Only this，We can be more reasonable、Intuize the responsibility and obligation of contemporary people to future descendants。Ecological ethicsist John Passmore proposed，The responsibility of the protection of the ecological environment is ultimately the responsibility of the person and the future descendants。but but，The key question is，What kind of responsibilities and obligations of contemporary people for future descendants，Ru Pasmore further question，"In the field of moral philosophy，One question is that if we have obligations for future generations，So what is this obligation? "certainly，This is another important issue worth studying，Because this problem is different from the "non -the same sexual problem"，It has acknowledged that contemporary people have certain responsibilities and obligations for future descendants。

(This article is the phased achievement of the general scientific research project (Y202146327) of the Zhejiang Provincial Department of Education (Y202146327) in 2021 

(Author Unit: College of Marxist College of Ningbo University)