bet365 best casino games The use of genetic artificial intelligence in academic research and academic evaluation should be cautious in accordance with regulations，Take it as a potential auxiliary tool，instead of an independent thinking and judgment of alternative researchers or peer evaluation experts。Generating artificial intelligence can effectively improve academic evaluation efficiency，But it is not suitable to replace human evaluation; it can be used as an effective auxiliary tool，But it must be dominated by human expert evaluation; academic evaluation is promoted by new，But the humanistic attributes evaluated are unchanged; generating artificial intelligence promotes academic evaluation modernization，But the essence of evaluation is human activity。Artificial Intelligence Age，We should adhere to the positive "pessimistic" and cautious "optimism" attitude，Keep a high degree of alertness to the phenomenon of possible technical alienation that may occur，Before mentioning the coupling relationship between artificial intelligence technology progress and academic evaluation system，Explore human -machine interaction、Repulse、New Evaluation Mode of Coordinated，Pay attention to academic "full evaluation"。

　Keywords:Genesis artificial intelligence academic evaluation CHATGPT full evaluation

　AuthorYe Jiyuan，Professor at the School of Information Management of Nanjing University (Nanjing 210023); Guo Weibing，Researcher of the Digital Economic Research Institute of Nanjing University of Technology (Nanjing 210094)。