bet365 Play online Bet365 lotto review Discuss climate science、Bet365 lotto review and technological topics such as gene editing may cause controversy，Therefore, many people think it is best to avoid this kind of conversation。But，Science of the University of Waterloo, Canada、Associate Professor of Health and Technical Communication Ashley Rose Mehlenbacher, Ashley Rose Mehlenbacher, wrote on the dialogue network recently，Constructive dialogue on the topic of science and technology is very important，People need Bet365 lotto review research、Bet365 lotto review progress、Professional knowledge and important new technologies perform direct dialogue。

Over the years，People have always been high in Bet365 lotto review and interest in science，But some investigations have shown that this situation seems to be changing。The emergence of the scientific Bet365 lotto review crisis has complexity。These trends are revealed by public opinion surveys，Questioning methods during the investigation obviously affect the final answer。For example，When asked "Do you Bet365 lotto review scientists"，The interviewee thinks about scholars or a specific scholar，Different association results will lead to different answers。So，Some controversy bet365 best casino games may be artificially manufactured，For example, on the issue of climate change，The universal consensus of scientists is diluted; in addition，The way to describe the problem will cause misunderstandings、Confusion and distrust。and once a problem is controversial，Perial differentiation may occur，Extreme language can naturally affect people's ways of thinking and discussing problems。

Meuren Bach and others jointly established a research network at the University of Waterloo，I raised a series of questions，Among them, why people Bet365 lotto review or do not Bet365 lotto review science and technology、Who deserves Bet365 lotto review、How does Bet365 lotto review generate or disappear、How to carry out dialogue on science and technology to better serve the public。They bet365 best casino games hope to carry out continuous series of lectures and cooperation with other organization researchers，The discussion and dialogue related to technology and Bet365 lotto review will continue。Meuren Bach and others said，Shourly avoiding these conversations will have many negative effects，If the relationship between further division and tension。Scientific research support policy will also be affected，Lack of emerging technical supervision。

The relationship between scholars and the public is not equal，Because scholars have professional academic knowledge that the public does not have，And the public needs to believe that scholars will use common values、The original intention of goodwill and reason，Provide the knowledge and information Bet365 lotto review for the public。If people think that scholars do not do this，Then trust will gradually decrease or even disappear。Trust has played a vital role in promoting scientific progress and social progress。So，Scholars need to work together to improve scientific research and its application，Encourage more conversations at the same time。

　(Practicing Zezhi Leisure/Compilation)