Transparency is very important for evidence -based decision -making
April 19, 2024 09:47 Source: "China Social Sciences", April 19, 2024, Issue 2876, Issue 2876

 Bet365 lotto review Now,In medical treatment、Education、Social work、Justice、Business Management、Environmental protection and other fields,More and more people have called for evidence -based decision -making。Recent,Christian Gade, an associate professor of the Department of Anthropology at the School of Culture and Social Sciences, Danish University of Culture and Social Sciences, wrote on the official website of the School of Political Economics, London, UK,Under what circumstances do individuals or organizations claim that some practice or policy follows evidence,The academic community also needs to make deeper critical thinking。The rationality of evidence -based decision -making depends not only on evidence,and depend on the subjective preference of the decision maker。

Gede said,Whether it is individual or institution,Decision makers only meet three conditions,Only there is a full basis that a policy is evidence -based policy。Conditions First, the comparison evidence of the decision maker has its policy effect and at least one alternative policy effect。For example,Even if the policy maker claims that policy A is a decision made by evidence -based decision -making method,It should not be easily asserted that policy A is better than other alternatives。Only when it has a considerable amount of evidence,It can prove that policy A is better than the alternative effect.,Only there is a reason to put forward bet365 live casino games this proposition。Here,"Better" is a question about effect or consequences,This research on evidence -based decision -making is placed in the ethical tradition of results theory。That is to say,A good effect or consequences of a certain policy may be any type of preference,Implementation。

Conditions The second is the support of the comparative evidence of at least one decision maker in a specific field.。From the perspective of Gede,Assume that decision makers prefer low -dedicated rates in the field of crime management,And holding relevant evidence can prove that the guidance rate caused by policy A is lower than that of policy B,Then it meets the condition 2。It is worth noting that,It is not enough to provide evidence support for policy support based on the preferences that someone may hold in a certain field。This is because the potential bet365 Play online games preference list is endless,Decision makers may claim that any policy is evidence -based policy,The term "evidence -based" loses accuracy and reliability。So,Only when the policy obtains at least one preferences that the decision maker actually holds at least one preferred evidence support,Decision makers have reason to claim that a policy is evidence。

Conditions III is that the decision makers explain the evidence and preferences that support a certain policy,Provides a reasonable explanation for policy support,Therefore, the foundation for the formulation of this policy is the foundation for evidence -based decision -making。Gede continued to explain with the above example,And assume that the comparison evidence of the decision makers shows,Compared with criminal management policy B,Criminal Management Policy A can control the bet365 Play online games guidance rate at a lower level,And the decision maker preferences low illegal rate。If the decision maker can prove that he does have the above evidence and preferences,Then there is reason to claim that policy A is evidence -based decision。It is worth noting that,Decision makers provide relevant evidence with the assistance of others (such as agent)、Explain preference,can also meet the requirements of condition three。

Gade believes,In political decision -making,The transparency of evidence and preferences is essential for ensuring the appropriateness and acceptability of the policy。If decision makers can clearly explain the comparative evidence and specific types of preferences they are based on,Even groups with different cognition and values,You can also have meaningful dialogue bet365 live casino games and discussion,Evaluate whether the policy is evidence -based and its rationality。

 (Liu Yuwei/Compilation)

Editor in charge: Zhang Jing
QR code icon 2.jpg
Key recommendation
The latest article
Graphics
bet365 live casino games
Video

Friendship link:

Website filing number: Jinggong.com Anmi 11010502030146 Ministry of Industry and bet365 best casino games Information Technology:

All rights reserved by China Social Sciences Magazine shall not be reproduced and used without permission

General Editor Email: zzszbj@126.com This website contact information: 010-85886809 Address: Building 11-12, Building 1, Building 1, No. 15, Guanghua Road, Chaoyang District, Beijing: 100026