Bet365 app download In most scientific research areas，The team is gradually becoming the main force to promote the production of knowledge。According to statistics，In the United States，The scale of the scientific research team expanded by 50%between 1981 and 1999。Study shows，In recent years，More than 80%of scientific and engineering publications and more than 2/3 patents are all achieved by many scientific researchers。Recent，Denisa Mindruta (Denisa Mindruta), deputy professor of strategic and business policy in Paris, France, wrote it for "Dialogue"，Focus on the influence of outstanding scientific researchers on the overall performance of the scientific research team and the relative contribution to innovation，and explore how to optimize the team composition，Improve the efficiency of scientific research and innovation。

"Star Scientists" refers to scientists who are the leading level and actively participate in commercial activities in their peers。Ming Druta pointed out，"Star Scientist" has two ways to promote the comprehensive performance of the scientific research team。First，The participation of "Star Scientists" has comprehensively improved the performance of collaborators in scientific research quality and scientific research output，makes the team's work more successful。As early as May 2010，Pierre Azoulay, a professor of management at Massachusetts Institute of Technology, and the overflowing effects of the 112 "academic stars" or the overflowing effect caused by the 112 "academic stars"。Azule and others discovered，After the death of a "academic star"，The release rate of the research results of its collaborators continues to decrease by 5-8 percentage points。Next，Existing research Bet365 lotto review indicates，Scientific researchers may be easier to attract talents and resources than peers than peers，"Matthew Effect" appears。For "Star Scientists"，"Matthew Effect" reflects a feedback cycle (Feedback loop)。In this case，Outstanding researchers can give priority to giving funds in the academic and private sector、High -level graduate students and advanced experimental facilities and other important resources，Then get greater success quickly。

In order to explore outstanding scientific researchers such as "star scientists" and cooperation teams to achieve good cooperation，Ming Druta and others analyzed the relevant data disclosed by a well -known university in the United States from 1988 to 1999。In view of the disclosure and submission of legal documents，This method effectively avoids the influencing factor that may distort the real proportion of the author of the publication，If human relationship or institutional factors，It is important to ensure the accuracy of research。Bet365 app download Among the 1003 scientists (of which 248 are the heads of the scientific research team)，Researchers finally selected a group composed of 30 "star scientists" as research objects，The scientific research achievements of these 30 scientists have been ranked at the top 5%of the world。

Ming Druta and others discovered，High -level scientific research team leaders often work with high -level collaborators，This discovery supports the "star scientist" that is easier to attract the talent of talented team。At the same time，excellent leaders have more opportunities to come into contact with collaborators who have intersection with them in their professional knowledge，and get the favor of the other party。High -level team leaders are more inclined to work in a team composed of senior and junior scientific researchers，This can be seen，The diversity of scientific research perspective and skills is important in driving innovation discovery。

other，Ming Dru Teta and others calculated the loss of the research influence caused by the replacement of "star scientists" or bet365 best casino games their collaborators，to measure the irreplaceability of "star scientists" in team cooperation。results show，"Star Scientists" contribute more than other collaborators.。In a case of 14.3%，"Star Scientist" has contributed more than other collaborators to the creation of knowledge; in a 9.5%case，Cooperators are the leading parties; in more than 3/4 cases，Both parties do not occupy the dominant position，but the complementary nature between "Star Scientists" and teams to maximize research value。

Ming Dru Tower said，There is an unfair phenomenon in the honor distribution in the field of scientific research，This manifestation is too much focusing on the outstanding performance、Personal personal。"Star Scientist" undoubtedly promoted the development of scientific research and innovation，and bring value that cannot be ignored for scientific research cooperation。but，Society should be in the background of the "star scientist"，Objectively evaluate their research results。Bet365 lotto review In most cases，"Star Scientists" collaborators also paid a lot of hard blood for the production of the final results。The contribution of the partner should pass the intellectual property certification、Financial returns and methods of obtaining other resources get recognition。

　(Liu Yuwei/Compilation)