Since the beginning of the 21st century，In order to build a discipline theory with real global significance，The international relations academic community has successively proposed the theory of non -Western international relations、Hou Western International Relations Theory、The theory of the International Relations of the Poor Colonial and the Concepts and Perspectives of Global Relations。These theoretical perspectives intertwine each other、Each has its own focus，Divided into compatible paths and critical paths by the academic world。The relationship between the "center" and "edge" around international relations，The two paths have launched a wealth of arguments on the issues such as "globalism", "universalism" and "single world".，It provides an important reference for the challenges facing us in the development of China's international relations theory。

　　bet365 live casino games

In criticism of compatible paths，Many scholars think，Due to the abandonment of a critical tradition in the theory of the post -colonial international relations due to global international relations，Not only cannot achieve true diversity、Theoretical construction with global significance，Instead, to a certain extent, it plays a role in consolidating or even strengthening the theory of mainstream international relations。bet365 Play online games Felix Anderl (Felix Anderl) and Antonia Witt questioned the "globalism" of the "globalism" that did not increase the self -examination of global international relations from two aspects: First，Global International Relations emphasizes diversified universalism and is committed to building a knowledge system for the establishment of international relations disciplines，This makes multiple generalism a new knowledge measurement standard。Although compared to one yuan universalism，Diverse recognition of generalism、Accept a variety of possibilities，But it still emphasizes universal validity。Therefore，If it takes it as a measure，Does it mean that knowledge system that does not have global universality is not enough to be included in the knowledge system of international relations disciplines? second，Global International Relations Accept，Scholars who believe that a diversified background should join。But，In fact, many scholars cannot or are unwilling to join this common body，Does this mean that they are not qualified to talk about international politics? Andre and Weite think，These assumptions of global international relations indicate that it is studying how to determine international relations、Who study the current situation of power relationship lacks sufficient criticism。Therefore，Although it has expanded the vision of international relations disciplines in many aspects，and scholars with a diversified background are more tolerant，But these efforts and advantages actually played the role of fans and preservation instead of changing the bet365 live casino games status of international relations disciplines。

Andre and Weite's discussion on "globalism" mainly lies in the level of epistemology and methodology，David L. Blaney and Arlene B. Tickner will promote the criticism of compatible paths to the ontology level。They point out，The "single world" logic in colonial modernity is generally reliced ​​in the "global steering" faction。Although they have proposed the knowledge of world diversification，But still recognize the fact that "only one world" is still recognized。Blaney and Tikina emphasize，People not only believe in various facts，At the same time, it is also realizing different facts through different practices。The logic of "Single World" has eliminated the facts that coexist in multiple different worlds，Therefore, it cannot solve the conflict between many worlds in reality。As far as global international relations are concerned，The logic of "single world" is mainly reflected in its supplement to existing international relations rather than replacement，This contradiction with the diverse universalism it advocates。It is because of the lack of understanding of global international relations in the level of world political entity.，As a result, "diversity" eventually reduced to the internal classification of "one yuan"。

At the same time，From the perspective of compatible paths，There are many limitations in the critical path。First，Critical theory is more than surgery for existing international relations theory，Insufficient construction。No matter what attitude does the current bet365 live casino games status of international power bet365 live casino games structure，Unpaid is，The existing international relations academia is the only space for scholars from the non -Western world to obtain the right to speak。Despite the proposal of critical theory to completely change the status quo，and put forward an innovative understanding of "globalism" and "universalism"，but did not point out the feasibility path that realizes the real diverse world and constructs the theory of global observation。From the results,，Critical theory has not effectively changed the status quo of mainstream international relations。Next，Critical theory Emphasize the opposition and conflict between "different"，Ignoring the contact between them。Amitav Acharya pointed out when criticizing the theory of international relations after criticism，These dual theories not only strengthen the West and Non -West、Colonial and non -colonial、The dual opposition between the center and the edge，And ignoring the inseparable connection and interaction between them。In theoretical construction，It is difficult for scholars in non -Western world to completely get rid of the discourse system of mainstream international relations，This is not only caused by the power structure，It is because of the connection between theoretical resources。No matter the non -Western theoretical soil or Western theoretical soil，Each internal has already been absorbed in the long historical process、Fusion of each other。

　　China's international relations theory development new road

Current，China's international relations scholars mainly have a effective reference Bet365 lotto review on compatible paths，But generally lacks interest in critical theory and critical path。This makes it difficult for scholars to break through the restraint of the "universal" thinking mode，It is easy to make the relevant theory of the construction of China (even the "Chinese school") that is lost in the narrow cognition of "universal"。

but but，China's international relations community has made an innovative exploration of theoretical development path。Under the status of the power structure，Chinese scholars are not strengthening their "edge" status to challenge "center"，Instead, try to directly act on the "center" to reconstruct its strategy，Both feasibility and effectiveness，It is a continuous exploration result。Relying on the theoretical background and resources of "global steering"，I put forward three ideas that need to be deepened and expanded，Thinking of the development path of China's international relations theory in further。

First，In order to deepen the understanding of the "center" of international relations and the relationship between China's international relations theory and "center"，In addition to more criticism of criticism to promote the current "center",，It should also analyze the evolution of the "center" itself in the process of history，Introduce time dimension in the consideration of "center" and "edge"，Explore the relationship between the two in the complex network intertwined in time and space。

Second，Reflection of the limitations that have understood "global"，Establish bet365 live casino games a more inclusive global view。To this end, you can start from two aspects: First, find "Global" from the perspective of seeing micro -knowledge，Beyond the original expansion thinking mode，Reverse focusing on the process of "global" into a specific space -time process，and find the global meaning in it。The second is to deepen the reflection on the "human centerist" thinking mode，Beyond the thinking of human "global" as a whole。

third，The human relations with the "global steering" are human relations with the world、Plateral cognition。This is not the empty talk of humanities and social sciences，In fact, scientific results have long been reflected in more comprehensive and in -depth。It is foreseeable is，The worldview and epistemology brought by the new scientific theory will also further promote theoretical innovation of disciplines such as international relations。Draw the scientific world view of culture with a novel perspective of cutting -edge technology，and provide accurate conceptualization and epistemology tools，Can provide new opportunities for the universal connotation of exploring culture and seeking higher levels of universality。

　　(This article is the theoretical innovation of the State Relationships of International Relationships and the Research on China International Relationships (22BGJ002) in the general project of the National Social Science Foundation of the National Social Science Fund)

(Author Unit: The Institute of Globalization and Global Issues of China University of Political Science and Law)