mid -October 1843，After moving to Paris, Marx passed the criticism of Bununo Powell in the "German Yearbook"，The completion of political liberation means the implementation of religion set，Religion is a manifestation of secular defects，So politics、The secular foundation of the upper -level buildings such as religion and other buildings is attributed to citizens society，and the critical spearhead shifted from an ethical state to a civic society，"Anatomy of civil society should go to political economics to seek"。Until the beginning of the move in the early February 1845，Political economics research that Marx engaged in Marx during the Paris period includes two parts，The first part is Smith、Sais、Li Jiatu and other British French economists from British French people's economists excerpted from nine volumes (or seven volumes) political economics notes，The second part is June to August 1844，Excerpt notes according to part of the excerpt，"Manuscripts of Economics Philosophy of 1844" written。The academic community generally refers to the above two parts of the "Paris Manuscript"。We will focus on the three literature issues focused on the study of domestic and foreign academic circles in the "Paris Manuscript" research，Try to clarify the relationship between the "Manuscript of Economics in 1844" and "Mueller Review"。

　　bet365 Play online games

"Manuscript of Economics of 1844" contains 3 manuscripts: Make Manuscripts Consistence consists of 9 paper (bogen)，The first half is based on Smith、Excerpts of the works of Sais and others，Three sources of analyzing national income，The second half is the famous alienated labor and private property chapter。Most of the manuscripts of the second manuscript have been lost now，Two pieces of paper (lose bl? 觌 tter)，The discussion is the relationship between the private property of labor and capital。There are 17 pieces of paper Bet365 lotto review in the manuscript III.，supplement the text of the text of the second manuscript Ⅱ from three copies、Based on the last chapter of "Spiritual Phenomenology", the criticism of Dialectics of Hegel、Several supplements and composition of fragments of division of labor and currency。

1932，MEGA1 i/3, edited by the Soviet Marx Engels Research Institute, published "Paris Manuscripts" for the first time，Except "The Manuscript of Economics in 1844"，This volume contains a total of 9 volumes of Marx's political economy notes during the Paris period。MEGA1 i/3 volumes numbered the order of the excerpt notes (this number became the practice of discussing "Paris Manuscripts" in the academic community)。The first volume excerpts Sais's "Introduction to Political Economics"、Scarberk "Social Wealth Theory"、Say "Full Tutorial of Practical Political Economics"，The second volume of Smith's "National Wealth Theory" (French version)，The third volume excerpts Lewase "Memoirs"、Smith's "National Wealth Theory" (French version)，Fourth Volume Excerpt color Nobofen's "Spartan Political Physical Theory"、Li Jiatu's "Principles of Political Economics and Taxation" (French version) and Mueller's "Principles of Political Economics" (French version)，Fifth volume excerpts McCuolh "On the Origin of Political Economics、Development、Special objects and importance "(French version)、Tellasi "Ideology Principles"、Pricer "Translator's Thinking of the Li Jiatu System"、Engels's "Critical Critical Outline" and Mueller's "Principles of Political Economics"，Volume 6 excerpts Roddell's "On the Nature and Origin of Public Wealth and the Methods and Reasons for its increase" (French version)，Volume VIII Edit Political Economics Principles、Liszt's "National System of Political Economics"、Osiande, "Public Commerce、Disappointment of the interests of industrial and agricultural interests or the aftertaste of Dr. Liszt's industrial power "、Li Jiatu's "Principles of Political Economics and Taxation"，Eighth Volume Editor Bergir Bai's "French Detailed Detailed" and other three works、Luo Bet365 lotto review "On Currency and Trade" (French version)，Book 9 Excerpt Brey "On the Poverty of the British French Class"。

Different from mega1，Mega2 includes "Paris Manuscripts" in different volumes。MEGA2 IV/2 published in 1981 Excerpted Roddell and Bergirba's two notes and moved to "Brussels Note"，At the same time, it is set by MEGA1 i/3 volume as the coloring notes of "Brussels Note" to add notes to "Paris Manuscript"，A total of 7 political economics notes made by Marx made from October 1843 to the end of January 1845。MEGA2 i2i/2 published in 1982 recorded the "Manuscript of Economics and Philosophy of 1844" from March 1843 to August 1844's works、Thesis and manuscript。

　　Controversy about the order of writing in Paris Manuscripts

About Political Economics Excerpt Note and "The Manuscript of Economics of Economics in 1844"，The general point of view is believed that Marx is after writing the first to five notes，Based on the above -mentioned excerpt notes, I wrote the "Manuscript of the Economics Philosophy of 1844"。1969 Soviet scholar Laibin proposed "Manuscript Ⅰ → fourth、Five notes (Li Jiatu、Mueller, etc.) → Manuscript of the No. II、Draft III Manuscript "crosswriting theory，The Marx's research on political economics from 1843 to August 1844 is divided into the following two stages: the first stage is based on the first、2、Three volumes of excerpt notes to write down the first manuscript I; Marx interrupted the writing of "The Manuscript of Economics in 1844" in the second stage，Excerpt fourth、Five volumes of notes，and then complete the No. Ⅱ、III manuscript。The reasons for Laibin's inference are as follows: (1) Manuscript Ⅰ does not quote fourth、Five volumes of excerpt notes，The only reference to Li Jiatu is introduced by Lei Jiatu; (2) Draft No. Ⅰ does not present research on the relationship between currency and social communication in "Mueller Review"; (3) No. Ⅱ、III manuscripts are referenced multiple times、Five Volume Excerpt "Mueller Review"; (4) No. Ⅱ、The level of economics research in manuscripts III is significantly higher than that of Draft No. Ⅰ。

It is worth mentioning bet365 best casino games is，Japanese scholar Nakagawa Hiroshi was before Laibin，Similar inferences in 1968。Nakagawa Hong believes that Manuscript No. Ⅰ、The possibility of interactive writing between "Mueller Review" and the manuscript of No. II ⅱ，The reason is that Mueller's name first appeared in Draft No. Ⅱ，Draft III manuscript began to quote "Mueller Review"。This means，Draft No. 1, especially the "Alien Labor" chapter, is just based on the excerpts of Sii and Smith.，Marx is writing No. Ⅱ、III manuscripts were previously excerpted with related works of Li Jiatu and his school。

The editor -in -chief of MEGA2Ⅰ/2 Volume Taobert, on the one hand, acknowledged that Marx was written before writing the second manuscript，No stop at Say and Smith，Instead, the theory of the difference between the difference between the Li Jiatu school was introduced，Compared with the manuscript I of the No. 1 manuscript, the understanding of the theory of national economics has made significant progress; on the other hand, she also believes that the above -mentioned progress of Marx is not based on the excerpt of Li Jiatu or Mueller's works，Instead, it is excerpted by McCallohhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh、Pricer and Engels have obtained the economic doctrine of Li Jiatu indirectly，No. Ⅱ、III manuscripts are very small to Li Jiatu。Taobert's determination，Marx only took off the works of Li Jiatu and Mueller after writing "The Manuscript of Economics in 1844"，"Muller Review" About currency、The discussion of division of labor and exchange is just the supplement and continuing of the manuscript III.，From this negating Labin's inference。

but，Marx in No. Ⅱ、Ⅲ manuscript mentioned "Modern British National Economics" represented by the Li Jiatu school，Shi Nicheism, which is also rejected the bourgeois national economics，List Li Jiatu directly、Mueller's name，can also be regarded as a proof of "Mueller Review"。Taobert's inference on the writing order of "Paris Manuscripts"，"Manuscript I ⅰ → McColoh、Predes and Engels Excerpt Note → No. Ⅱ、Manuscript III → Li Jiatu、Mueller picking notes "，Obviously lack of persuasion。In short，bet365 Play online games About the writing order of "Paris Manuscript"，Zhongchuan Hong and La Bin's inference logic self -consistent，It is also widely accepted for the international academic circles。

　　Self -alienation and interactive alienation

Based on Nakagawa Hong and La Bin's research order of "Paris Manuscripts" writing order，Some scholars propose to demonstrate the level of "Mueller Review" from the level of the relationship between the relationship between the "Mueller Review" and the alienation of the manuscript I.。The basic point of view is as follows: (1) Marx's general influence of the Ferbaha people in the manuscript stage Ⅰ，The alienation labor explained is the logic of self -alienation of isolated people，The perspective of lack of social relationships about the nature of people。Ferbaha's alienation lacks self -recovery of the subject，Its alienation is unilateral，Is a negative alienation。(2) When explaining why labor belongs to others，Alienation Labor has a logical lack in the process of transition from the first provisions to the second regulation。(3) Period of Manuscripts ⅰ，The essence of the category referred to by Marx is only a common natural existence or consciously engaged in conscious activities.，The common meaning that does not have the common existence of social relationships。until "Mueller Review"，Marx only defines the essence of human category as "common existence"，Knowing the level of "Outline of Ferbaha"。(4) In "Mueller Review"，Marx analyzed alienation between people through alienation，At this point, the fourth specified explanation of alienation was completed。(5) In "Mueller Review" and the III manuscript，Marx shifted from Falbaha's alienation framework to Hegel。The concept of alienation of Hegel is positive，Individuals as the main body can get social attributes。

　　As a conclusion，The author clarifies the position of this article by asking the above questions。

One aspect，Is the alienation in the Ferbaha people's alienation is a one -way、Negative alienation? According to Ferbaha's point of view，People know themselves through objects，The relationship between people and objects is the relationship between Bet365 lotto review people and their own essence，The consciousness of the object is human self -consciousness。In "The In essence of Christianity"，Ferbaha used the philosophy of the person who expresses the objectivity to criticize Christianity，It is believed that in the objective relationship with religion is the relationship between people and their own essence，Human religious consciousness is human self -consciousness，The self -consciousness that pointed out that Hegel's spiritual philosophy is used as an absolute spirit is actually human consciousness for God。The trinity of God in Christianity is nothing more than the essence of human beings，That is rational、Unification of love and will，Religious objects inside themselves，The relationship between man and God，is the inherent and objective relationship of people and people。other，Ferbaha pointed out，People give them their own essence at the same time，It means leaving consciousness or personality to yourself，When religion is a practical and subjective position, it shows an intangible side，That is the omnipotent of subjectivity or mood，And the contradiction between God's self -consciousness and human consciousness into the contradiction between the essence of love and the belief of the subject。Ferbaha completely incorporated this contradiction in religious relations in the field of epistemology，The degree of understanding of God is related to the same degree of people and their own inherent essence。As a disciple of Hegel，Ferbaha's religious criticism does not break free of the theoretical framework of enlightenment，Its alienation is not unidirectional negative。He defines the alienation or alienation between God and the man as "Unreal opposition"，As long as you realize that God is the inherent essence of man itself，You can achieve the essence of human beings and the same，Realization of the reconciliation of the essence of belief and class。

On the other hand，Labor alienation and communication alienation，High or low? The alienation in "Mueller Review" refers to under currency relations，The relationship between the relationship between people Bet365 lotto review and people is alienated into the interaction of the object (Sache)。Marx in the "On Jews"，Industry has clarified that money (currency) is a human labor、The essence of sympathy for the same person，and the rule of this alien social relationship。The social relationship of this materialized phenomenon has created the separation of capital and labor，This is exactly the prerequisite for labor alienation。

　(Author Unit: School of Philosophy of Wuhan University)