In recent years，The Party Central Committee attaches great importance to strengthening the construction of academic journals。May 9, 2021，General Secretary Xi Jinping is in the reply to all editors of the editorial department of "History and History" to Shandong University，Handle expectations for running a good philosophy and social science journal; May 18, 2021，Central Propaganda Department、Ministry of Education、The Ministry of Science and Technology issued the "Opinions on Promoting the Prosperity and Development of Academic Journals"，Institutional guidance of the development of academic journals in the new era。Promote the high -quality development of academic journals，The key is to explore the establishment of a scientific and reasonable academic journal evaluation system，to promote academic innovation、Cultivate excellent academic talents、Improving the international discourse bet365 live casino games right of academic journals、Constructing China's independent knowledge system。

Improve academic journal evaluation index system。Current，Evaluation indicators of academic journals are mostly cited、Reproduced rate and other data is the main basis。For this，Some academic journals prefer famous artists，Reduce the number of posts，Set up job title、Education、Unit threshold，Even a compulsory reference、Fake pseudo note and other phenomena。These behaviors are growing for academic talents、Academic Innovation and other adverse effects。Promote the high -quality development of academic journals，Need to break the reference rate、Reproduced rate, etc. The evaluation index system，Create a set of coverage、The indicator is comprehensive、Evaluation system for weight science。First, further optimize the existing quantitative evaluation index system，Set different evaluation indicators according to the characteristics of different disciplines，Citation rate、Reprint rate and other quantitative indicators set different weight standards, etc.Bet365 lotto review 。Second, fully consider the full evaluation of the journal，Improve value leaders、Academic Innovation、The author constitutes the situation、Freedom coming for the proportion、Review mechanism、Editorial Equipment and other evaluation indicators，to comprehensively reflect the level of academic journals，Guide academic journals to establish the correct direction of running。

Establishing a classification evaluation system for academic journals。The number of academic journals in my country is huge，and there is a large difference in academic journals in the same category。Overall，It can be roughly divided into comprehensive academic journals and subject academic journals。In the subject academic journal，Journal covering the entire discipline，There is also a journal that only pays attention to the secondary discipline or a certain research field。Take the field of Chinese literature as an example，Journal covering the whole subject，Also focused on ancient literature、Modern Literature、Journal of Contemporary Literature，Bet365 lotto review There are also special research Lu Xun、Guo Moruo、Du Fu、Journal of "Dream of Red Mansions"。These academic journals have their own different research scope、Theoretical methods and subject value，The current evaluation system cannot fully show the unique value and academic creativity of various journals。Therefore，The evaluation criteria of academic journals should be continuously enriched，Take into account the nature of the publication、Disciplinary features、Scope of research，Construct a classification evaluation system，Set more detailed evaluation standards。First，Set the evaluation index system that is compatible with it according to the characteristics of different disciplines。The second is to evaluate according to the characteristics of the subject，Especially the research results of some basic research and unpredictable studies，It should focus on its academic innovation、Academic value、Social and cultural guidance and other aspects improve the evaluation index system。

Establish an evaluation system combining quantitative Bet365 app download and qualitative。Current，Some academic journals are simply based on quantitative indicators as evaluation standards，Leading some outstanding academic journals in the academic community because of low reference rate、The narrow coverage of disciplines is rejected outside the "core journal"。Evaluation of academic journals should be a comprehensive evaluation of academic journals，Content quality involved in academic journals、Brand reputation、academic influence、Academic Innovation、Author team and other multiple elements。Evaluation system for improving academic journals，A set of evaluation mechanisms combined with quantitative and qualitative should be established。First, establish a qualitative evaluation expert database，Give full play to the academic advantages of experts and scholars of various disciplines，Academic Journal Evaluation System combined with the combination of quantitative evaluation and expert evaluation。Second, strengthen the selection of peer evaluation experts，Pay attention to the academic level of the review experts、Bet365 lotto review review performance、Credit credibility, etc.。Establish an evaluation expert evaluation of the credibility system，Ensure the objectivity of the evaluation。

　　(This article is the key project of the National Social Science Foundation of the National Social Science Fund "the guidance of the quality improvement project of literary and artistic works、Study on Innovation of System Design and Practice "(21AZD054) phased results)

(Author Unit: School of Arts of Shandong University)