Where is the source of sociology? Kong De?，This problem is constantly incorporated into the vision of Chinese sociologists。The author is only on the source of Chinese sociology，Talk about some experience in terms of logic and meaning。

On the one hand，Explore the source of Chinese sociology，Logically, it is established。

Can sociology only originate in the West? Although the current academic community is recognized as the founder of sociology，The name of "Sociology" from him from him。Later，Classic sociologist Marx、Turkan、Development of Weber and others，Let Sociology really be a social science，and opened the road of diversified development of sociology。but，Knowledge may not be true knowledge。The history of sociology only started from Kong De? Is the logic of sociological history really like this?。

From the logical perspective，If the concept of sociology is relaxed -if it is not stubborn, who proposes the name "sociology"，So you can find a variety of source at sociology。October 1993，Fei Xiaotong pointed out in an academic speech at the Chinese University of Hong Kong: "If we agree to relax the scope of the subject of sociology，Including people's knowledge and theory of interpersonal relationships，The source of sociology has a long history in China。I remember Radcliv Brown once said at Yanjing University，He believes that China has already created this subject in the Warring States Period，More than 2,000 years earlier than Kongde and Spencer in the West。Whether we agree Bet365 app download with his opinion，We cannot deny，Pay attention to interpersonal relationships，It has always been the characteristic of Chinese culture。In such a long history，There are many population，experience accumulated in this area of ​​people and people，It should be taken seriously，and the critical moment when human beings enter the world today，Perhaps more special significance。"Fei Xiaotong's" Trial of the Traditional Limits of Expansion Sociology "in his later years，It can be regarded as "Social Care for Sociology", which is the direction of Chinese sociology。In this article，He first talks about the discipline with dual personality of science and humanities from sociology，Then clearly pointed out: "Humanity of sociology，determines that sociology should put a certain amount of energy，Study some basic problems such as' people '' 'group' '' social '' ‘culture”，Laying a more solid foundation for the discipline construction of sociology。China's generous cultural traditions and a large number of social history practice，Contains profound social thoughts and humanistic psychological concepts，The huge potential of promoting the development of sociology，It is a cultural treasure that has not yet been excavated "。

Liu Shaojie has discussed the question of the "starting point" question of sociology，He thinks，The essence of sociology is directly related to the understanding of the starting point and development process of sociology。Because different essence defines different sociology，So the starting point and evolution of sociology have different vision and explanations。When Hegel is writing philosophy history，The bet365 best casino games nature of philosophy attaches great importance to the relationship between the history of philosophy，He is not looking for the starting point of philosophy like a general historian，Instead, first clean up the philosophical concept，Only after clarifying the concept of philosophy revealed the origin and evolution clue of philosophy。Turlgan proposed the basic principles of sociology based on Montesquien、Classification of social life these two standards，Determine Montesquien as the founder of sociology，Also followed the above logic of Hegel。，Raymond Alon inherited the position of Turkan，Writing the history of western sociology from Montesquien。Liu Shaojie pointed out，Tuergan "The significance of questioning the starting point of sociological history is to break through the closure of studying the history of sociological evolution。If the concept of sociology proposes sociology is used as the starting point of the history of sociology，This not only means that the history of sociology has a certain starting point，Do you have to think about the research on sociology before Confucius，and also means that a relatively narrow range is limited to sociology "。Next，Turkan regards a person who has never used sociological concepts as sociology pioneer，3368_3408，or not is he in essentially established or discussed the principles of sociology。From Liu Shaojie's view，"Scholars who actually developed sociological research before forming a sociological concept like Montesquien，must not be just Montesquien alone in the history of thought "。The source of sociology goes back to the practice of Xunzi or other thinkers，The practice of Montesquien as a pioneer of sociology bet365 live casino games is the same in nature。"They all adhere to a common principle，Standards for judging sociological ideas and the scale of studying sociological history，Not the direct declaration of the thinker，and in their ideological content。"" Here is a problem of self -ism and consciousness of sociological research。From the consciousness of the subject，Kong De、Turkan、Weber、Zimeer、Parsons and other sociologists consciously launched sociological research。"But，We should not restrict the history of sociology only on these sociological researchers that have achieved consciousness in the discipline ... Sociology should have this courage，Breakthrough only compiles the history of sociology from the restrictions of subject consciousness，This is the subject consciousness that has not yet formed sociology，But some sociological ideas have been explained，Scholars who have contributed to the development of sociology are listed into the historical team of sociology ... This is not just a question of self -definition of the starting point of their own history，and whether it is a discipline to open my mind，Absorb ideological essence in the long river of human thought、Support my own fundamental problem to gain more sufficient development。”

According to the above logic，If the concept of sociology、If the essence is defined and pushed，In the history of sociological development in China，Xunzi has the qualifications of the founder of Sociology -although he has not used the concept of sociology，It is not possible to have the consciousness of the subject of sociology，But this does not prevent him from the historical status and value of his bet365 live casino games historian as a spontaneous sociologist。Like the name of "philosophy" in ancient China，Only Confucianism、Learning of Laozhuang、Wei Jin Xuanxue、Song Ming Confucianism and other philosophy existence forms，Can't say that there is no philosophy in China，It can’t be because there is no "sociology" in ancient China，Only the existence of the actual theory of Sociology such as Xunzi，It is said that there is no sociology in ancient China。Yan Fu translates sociology into "group learning"，and define the group academics as "the reason for knowing the chaos and interests，A learning that can have the merits of cultivation of Qi Zhiping "。Inger also thinks，"Sociology is trying to explain the essence of social order and social turmoil"。The essence of sociology is defined as the standard，We can determine: The knowledge of society built by Xunzi is sociology。As Jing Tiankui said: "Can't introduce the western sociology into the original number of Chinese sociology。Chinese academics have not stepped on the ‘point’ (rhythm) of Western academics since ancient times。Different civilization has its own origin，Different academic，There are different concepts、Different forms、Different traditions ... ‘source’ of Chinese sociology，It is a local sociological traditional resource represented by Xunzi's "group learning" ... No matter what deficiencies are，‘Polysis’，The degree of professionalism is not high，There are always the most basic cultural genes of our Chinese academic academics in it -that is the root of Chinese sociology。”

On the other hand，Explore the source of Chinese sociology，It has its positive significance in the construction Bet365 lotto review of a Chinese sociological academic discourse system。

Fei Xiaotong proposed the concept of "cultural consciousness"，Zheng Hangsheng attaches great importance to the "theoretical consciousness" of Chinese sociology，Lu Xueyi diligently in order to localize the localization of sociology。Current，Construction of Chinese sociological academic discourse system has become the consensus and future efforts of Chinese sociological circles。So，How to build a academic discourse system for Chinese sociology? Explore the source of Chinese sociology，Digging the profound value of it，It is the meaning of the question of building a Chinese sociological academic discourse system。

Chinese discourse system for constructing sociology，First of all, you should reflect on the origin concept of sociological origin in the discussion system of the Western Center。The famous "Lee Joseph Data Question"，It is the "problem" only in the field of vision in the western center; Weber's famous proposition on the relationship between Eastern and Western culture and modernization，It is also a paradigm for the "Western Center"。But we have never reflected in depth: about the origin of sociology，Are we unconsciously、Lower subconscious、Without criticism and reflection, it is affected by the potential thinking of the Western Center on the conclusion of Renyun Yiyun? So that when scholars and other scholars remind us of this，We are still like the prisoner in the "cave metaphor" in Plato，For those who show their bright people who do not understand，Even does not believe it?

Based on the origin of the context of the context of reflection on the context of the Western Center，Explore the source of Chinese sociology，It has bet365 best casino games a positive significance for the academic discourse system that constructs Chinese sociology。For the rise of Chinese sociology，This is the meaning of exploring the source of Chinese sociology。

　　Bet365 app download