Improve the academic evaluation criteria of the academic research system and science，Help guides the healthy development of philosophy and social sciences。But，The current academic research system does not have sufficient openness and diversity。Recent，The official website of the London School of Political Economics, the University of Political Economics, released an article by Liz Allen, a senior researcher at the school。Allen thinks，To solve the problems of the existence of the existing academic research system today, they also face many difficulties。

　　Bet365 lotto review

The construction of the academic research system is not only related to researchers，will also be funded by a funding agency、Research Institutions、Academic publishers、Academic Bet365 app download groups and other stakeholders' influence; coordinate the relationship between those related stakeholders，It is conducive to the tolerance of academic research。

Introduction to Allen，"Declaration of San Francisco Research Evaluation Declaration" proposed at the annual meeting of the American Cell Biology Association in 2012，It is a global initiative covering all academic fields and all major stakeholders，Advocate adoption of more comprehensive、More balanced ways to evaluate researchers。Allen Suggestion，Depart from various fields and academic circles，For various views、Thoughts and actions take consideration。Create a type suitable for current scientific research activities，It is also applicable to the academic research culture of researchers。

Louise Shaxson, director of the research and development policy project of the British Overseas Development Research Institute, put forward four suggestions for the academic research atmosphere of open collaboration: bet365 Play online games focus on the use of collaboration、Methods that can be continuously created and continuously iterated; emphasizing the importance of local scholars on improving the credibility of the research results; establishing a area that can understand academic dialogue and how to interact with it; attach importance to the quality of evidence，Provide reliable database。

　　Encourage open access mode

People are increasingly realized that modern academic research culture needs to encourage and support open collaboration research behaviors。Several EU member states are developing an open scientific planning and framework，and establish an open scientific coordination mechanism at the national and institutional level，To promote policy formulation and implementation。The Open Research Framework (NORF)、Finnish open scientific coordination initiative、The National Open Science Platform of the Dutch National Open Science Platform，All representatives。

Current，The academic bet365 Play online games world requires more fairly to realize the open access of research results，This transformation requires that academic research culture has produced a greater change。Ernesto Priego, a library lecturer in London University Library Library, said，To seek practical and sustainable methods to increase open access，Need to change the academic publishing pattern more thoroughly。The future of the academic world should not be led by senior scholars who follow the traditional road。

Prosuction of Pricig，In the era of digital，Young scholars must develop their career in different ways，This can make academic publishing extensive openness。Open access should not become a privilege，To empower young scholars，Let them participate in the formulation of new academic research rules。

Evaluation Standards for Improved Academic Publishing

Allen said，Since the mid -1980s，With the emergence of the internal evaluation culture of the public sector and the academic world，Researchers found Bet365 app download that in the industry where it is located，The most valuable standard for evaluating performance and contribution，Is the results published and where is published。In this "not published，Drive "(Publish or Perish) under the influence of the driving force，Researchers face pressure from the results，It may cause unpredictable or even harmful consequences。

Allen thinks，Putting publications in the position better than other academic output，The ultimate goal of the research is not conducive to the realization of research，Because different types of research can reflect its value through different output forms。The pressure of the researchers published a work to a large extent comes from the standards formulated by academic publishers，Journal brand and classification、Journal -based measurement standards、Edit process and content screening、opaque peer review system、The difficult manuscript collection system、The increased cost factor, Bet365 lotto review etc.。With the development of academic research，Some outdated publishing requirements are no longer in line with the current academic research culture。But for academic publishers，The most important thing is to ensure the credibility and practicality of academic research。