Scientific Communication as an important link to connect scientific knowledge and ordinary people，The ability to enhance the research system to respond to global challenges。Recent，The website of the London School of Political Economics issued a document to discuss the effectiveness of scientific communication，and proposed that scientific communication must be based on evidence，Integrate scientific research and practice into a whole。The effectiveness of the effectiveness of scientific communication，Reporter interviewed relevant scholars。

　　bet365 Play online games

Current，Scholars' expectations for scientific communication far exceed the public's desire to obtain scientific knowledge，Scientific communication faces a series of challenges。For example，How to translate professional knowledge bet365 best casino games translation and translation into a language that ordinary people can understand，How to broaden effective communication channels, etc.。Development from scientific research、Propaganda to the final combination with practice，Facing a lot of obstacles in this process。First，The main channel of the current academic communication is academic publications，But among many uneven publications，It is difficult to determine which academic research can ultimately face the public。Next，When the same professional knowledge appears in different disciplines，Different professional terms used，Later identification and summary research results are difficult，As a result, academic research and practice are disconnected，Many outstanding scientific research results cannot be effectively applied to practice。other，Lack of science、The scientific communication evaluation standard of the system，Many academic publishing institutions cannot accurately determine whether scientific research results have bet365 Play online games practical application value。

German Rhine -Valdo -Valt University of Applied Science and Technology Professor Alexander Gerber told this reporter，Current，Many scholars do not recognize the effectiveness of scientific communication，Do not understand the correlation between scientific communication and practice。For example，Some scholars of some natural scientific backgrounds often lack professional social science knowledge，Leading its research and practice disconnection。Therefore，To establish a scientific communication path based on evidence，Scholars should constantly reflect on whether the research process and results are in line with scientific communication specifications。

Gobber emphasized，The current evaluation of scientific communication has not yet formed a professional system，Academic research institutions should strive to improve the academic communication level of scholars，Establish special funds to encourage researchers and practitioners to cooperate。

　　Based on evidence

Professor Eric A. Jensen, a professor at the Department Bet365 lotto review of Sociology at Winwei University, believes，It should improve the existing scientific communication specifications and practical methods，Effectiveness of improving scientific communication。First, start with the communication channel and method，Actively find a more suitable scientific communication path，Breaking the previous way of communication，Place the needs of the audience at the preferred position。Second, scientific communication needs to be more tolerant，Those who are targeted at different levels of social activities，Explore different communication rules and paradigms。Third is to improve scientific communication specifications，constantly reflect on the limitations of current scientific communication goals and strategies，Widely collected and analyzed practical methods based on evidence。

Gobber mentioned，Scientific communication based on evidence，Professional knowledge and practical skills should be、System research combines。It should follow the following principles: First, practice based on evidence。Add evidence Bet365 lotto review in scientific communication，Maximum effectiveness，Prevent negative impact。The second is based on evidence。Scientific research on defects，To reduce communication，At the same time, add the transparency of the research process。Third is the impact of evaluation。Evaluation of the influence of scientific communication as the standard for communication and funding，The purpose of the final achievement of the experimental results。Four is cooperation with each other。Through the formulation of policy，Encourage researchers and practitioners to understand the needs of each other、Experience、Skills and professional knowledge，Establish a more effective communication mechanism。Five is to re -examine the value of scientific communication。Design a variety of scientific activities，The important value of showing scientific communication on social development。Six is ​​to achieve system review。Formulate a guide to standardize scientific communication methods，Enhanced the replication of the research results。Bet365 lotto review Seven is to promote certification standardization。Promoting the scientific communication certification process and teaching training direction to standardization，At the same time, vigorously cultivate outstanding talents in the field of scientific communication。

Gobber said，Scientific communication methods and paradigms based on evidence，But it will promote the development of scientific research in a more practical direction。