World City Ranking、Global think tank ranking、World Governance Index Ranking ... In recent years，Global index rankings involved in various fields have triggered extensive discussion in public vision。What is the problem of "ranking hot"? What difficulties do you face the optimization of evaluation indicators?，This reporter interviewed experts and scholars from different disciplines。

　　bet365 live casino games

Scholar at the Department of International Relations at the University of Western Jiaotong, Debora v. Malito, said in an interview，Quantitative method is conducive to policy formulation，but also with political colors，The power operation of the internal and between the country is closely related。Index ranking helps to evaluate performance、Promoting action and change，It can also play a role in the process of formulating international norms。If you want to interpret the ranking rationally，It must sort out the relationship involved，Can't think of it as a numeric number completely neutral or pure technical level。The indicator is designed to reflect the established reality，And those reality that is difficult to measure。This may help us understand a phenomenon from a global perspective，But it may also consolidate certain stereotype biases。

Malita takes corruption indicators as an example，Explained the bias that may exist in the current global index ranking。Although bet365 best casino games various concepts embedded in international anti -corruption measures are universal，But its meaning is from certain specification preferences、Historical experience and the understanding of governance methods。Now there is a wider consensus thinking，Many corruption evaluation indicators based on subjective data cannot effectively measure corruption，Because the evaluation process is too dependent on specific groups，Especially the views of business elites or academic experts。This subjective tendency replaces reality to a certain extent。other，A measure of corruption facing a series of challenges brought by the defects of evaluation methods，For example, the visibility of data。Analysis of the status of various countries through comparative national capabilities or a certain development，There may also be problems。A multinational contrast and evaluation with a large span should be explained beforehand，and political debate or media discussions often ignore this。So，What we see often has a deviation comparison。

Ranking may also adversely affect social psychology。Professor Elena Esposito at the University of Bologna, a professor of sociology at the University of Bologna, and David C. Stark, a professor of sociology at the University of Columbia University in the "What did you observe the rating? Express in the article "The ranking of guiding role in the face of uncertainty，Rating and ranking encouraged instead of eliminating people's anxiety。Compared to the pre -modern society，The identity of contemporary people is increasingly liquid，This becomes the source of ambition or frustration。Ranking can Bet365 lotto review lead to anxiety，Part of the reason is that the ranking is not unchanged，Data has been updated。This means，The person in charge of the institution will be invested in the preparation of the next round of ranking after seeing the ranking of the ranking。other，The sense of urgency to work hard to improve or maintain at least the original ranking will also make people feel anxious。Evaluation criteria constituting rankings are often blurred，The decision -making process is not completely transparent，Many rankings lack clarity。What people feel that they must do something quickly，But what matters to be completed，Anxiety generated this。

Release ranking potential is far away

Reflection and improvement of the ranking of global indicators，Both due to the value meaning of the topic itself，Also because the country's "performance" at the global level will bring a series of practical impacts。Take the governance evaluation that has received wide attention in the near future as an example，Rachel M. Gissequist, a senior researcher at the Institute of World Development Economics of the United Nations University, said in an interview，Applying governance evaluation of various index indicators, except for being used in academic analysis and research，It also has multiple practical significance。They may affect foreign aid resource allocation and investors' views，Citizens and civilians can also use this to consider and evaluate the governance status of the country。

Some international organizations and industry experts have realized the limitations of the global index ranking，Make it into action to improve。Malito told reporters，Bet365 app download In the Framework Framework of Sustainable Development，The United Nations is working hard to promote the scientific community to provide better governance concepts and evaluation methods。but but，The concept of governance of global recognition is difficult to form，and，Some international claims in the field of governance are also increasingly questioned。The United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs, which is responsible for implementing the Sustainable Development target agenda, has recognized these problems and tried to solve it，Including the tolerance of the statistical department、Enhance the participation of national and local institutions in the framework of sustainable development target evaluation, etc.。Despite this，Measurement of the 16th item 16 (promoting peace and tolerance society that is conducive to sustainable development) such as the UN Sustainable Development Objectives) is still controversial，Because of some normative assumptions about good governance, it is often impossible to show the consensus of good governance under the existing evaluation。These assumptions are more of a dominant viewpoint based on Western centralist ideal governance type，and thereby generated specific governance preferences and governance methods。Improve the legality and credibility of the governance indicators，Need more knowledge and policy innovation，instead of adjusting ownership or participation in the existing framework。

At the same time，The positioning of the ranking may need to be re -considered。Espooth and Stark said in the article，The problem handled by the rating Bet365 app download is not to observe an independent world。On the contrary，Rating and ranking really facing the challenge is，Observation of this behavior must also accept observation。Rating and ranking is usually understood as a tool that can reveal the characteristics of the objective characteristics observed，Therefore, people are used to support selection and decision -making。But，Various rated and ranking often believes that the information it provides is one -sided or incomplete。So，Need to change the public’s understanding of ranking。People should recognize，The benefits of rating and ranking first come from the following reasons: they can convey the information that others know about observation objects to people，Which restaurant is the best word of mouth，Which university is considered the best。In fact，This type of "second -hand information" is often a reference that people need to reference when people make decisions，If people want to know which university can provide better employment prospects for themselves。From this perspective，Although the world itself is still full of uncertainty，But the information provided by the rating and ranking can guide people to make decisions and rationalize their choices。

The reflection on the ranking of the indicators also involves the unified problem of the same nature and the same nature of the globalization era。The Senior Researcher of the Institute of Modern History of the Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, Doubravka ) Tell reporters，Global indicators ranking and various lists must include more angles，It must ensure sufficient flexibility，bet365 Play online games and solidly provide a complete scene that can reflect the global trend。But the global perspective does not mean ignoring the power of the country。In her opinion，Humanities and Social Sciences to a large extent shaped national identity。So，Although more and more sight starts to focus on global issues，The authority of the country should still be guaranteed to maintain its own non -homogeneous，Local history、National Language is two examples of expressing this uniqueness。

Talk about the future of the future，Malito mentioned in the interview，In order to release the potential of the global index ranking，We want to surpass the technical category，Seeing global index ranking as part of the global knowledge production system。People have already appraised the existing governance evaluation in the overall acceptability、Legality and actual feasibility expressed concerns，Evaluation of the progress of the UN sustainable development goals。This is because there is a gap in the production and application of governance indicators in the north and south of the world，Most of the existing governance indicators come from high -income economies in North America or Europe。The boundary between standard producers and users damage the acceptability of the indicator，Because its legitimacy depends not only on the technical quality of the evaluation，It also depends on the quality assumptions and judgment of the normative assumption and judgment as the premise support evaluation。We need to better understand the problem of injustice and structural irregularity during the formulation of standards。I want to clarify who has the power Bet365 app download to formulate the framework of sustainable development agenda，You must first understand who founded it、Production and funding the existing evaluation indicators。