July 6，Dutch National Scientific Research Integrity Survey Report (hereinafter referred to as "Report") release，Treating heated discussion among scholars。Daniele Fanelli, a researcher at the Ethics of Ethics of the School of Political Economics, London, the United Kingdom, said，The current academic environment makes scholars face large internal and external pressures，Many scholars attach importance to the number of studies，Ignore research quality，Even the behavior of "cut corners" appears。It should be more transparent in the future、Responsible research specifications to improve academic atmosphere。Around the above problems，The reporter interviewed relevant scholars。

　　bet365 best casino games

Report the person in charge、Gowri Gopalakrishna, an expert at the University Bet365 lotto review of Amsterdam Medical Center in the University of Amsterdam, mentioned，Social development needs trustworthy research to deal with challenges，So，Scholars' research integrity、The replication of the research results has received widespread attention in the whole society。Scholars have the problem of integrity in scientific research not only violate the relevant ethics and methodology principles，It even destroys the effectiveness and credibility of the research。To clear the problem of problematic research projects，Research and practice of promoting responsibility，Scholars and academic institutions need to continue to make critical self -reflection，firm academic belief，Continue to promote scientific development。

Gorparak Rizhana Represents，This survey can be said to be the largest scale in the Netherlands so far。Due to the special prevention measures in the survey，Many more sensitive questions have also been answered，Make the report closer to reality。This survey issued a total bet365 Play online games of 60,000 scholars in 22 universities in the Netherlands，Involved in all discipline areas，Finally received 6,800 complete questionnaires。The problematic research practice mentioned in the questionnaire includes: "negative" data in the research experiment is not submitted for review; the defects and limitedness of the research are not reflected in the thesis; there is no enough colleagues who have a relatively shallow qualifications. Supervision and guidance;、Skills or professional knowledge do not pay enough attention; insufficient records of research process。After investigation，Half of the scholars have experienced problems in the past three years，Even 1/4 scholars have reportedly reported the results of research results in academic research in the past 3 years。And these problematic research and practice is mainly published with the paper、Academic funding and competition pressure between peers。where，Postdoctoral and assistant professors -level scholars are groups with bet365 Play online games the greatest external pressure and the most problems with the most external pressure，This may lack research experience with junior researchers、Insufficient supervision and guidance of their supervision and guidance。At the same time，The current academic environment does not support errors in public discussion research，Failure to establish a safe、Scientific research environment with sufficient supervision，This may lead to "hasty scientific behavior"。

　　Create a healthy academic environment

For the above problems，Dutch Holkhaffen Institute of Technology Social Psychology, Daniel Lakus () I think，To increase the publicity of scientific norms，Always remind scholars to attach importance to academic research specifications。other，At present, most academic research institutions have been implemented with the "no publicity" system，It may lead to the emergence of improper research behavior to a certain extent，The pressure of publishing papers has become a problem that many scholars have to Bet365 app download face。Lakus emphasized，Only reform of the existing unreasonable system，Introduction of diversified academic research evaluation standards，Only to develop high -quality academic research。

Penny Griffin, a senior lecturer at the School of Social Sciences at the University of New South Wales in Australia, told this reporter，There are differences between the academic norms recognized by some scholars and the specifications observed by the peers，Therefore, we must formulate a unified academic norm standard，This is to allow scholars to improve the quality of academic research、The basis for conducting responsible research。other，Strict reviewer system is also an important means to effectively improve academic quality，Because the reviewer can more accurately discover the potential problems existing in the paper，Reduce the probability of lowering low quality or problematic papers。It is necessary to continuously improve the degree of sharing of scientific practice，Increase the transparency of scientific bet365 Play online games research，Containing academic fake behavior。

Griffin also mentioned，Establish a strict academic review agency and formulate relevant legal policies，Make necessary accountability for problems with problems，Strict punishment for fake scholars，It helps to create a healthy academic environment，Let scientific research better develop。