No matter which subject is，Only a few scholars and their research results can become classic，Aroused continuous interest in the academic world and laid the foundation for subsequent research。but but，People do not know much about scholars and their works to be recognized、The process of standing out。Nicole Holzhauser, a sociology researcher at the University of Buren Rick Institute of Technology, Germany, published this year's research results "Quantitative research on the" formalization "process of quantitative research，or how to become a classic in social sciences，Exploring the distribution process and exclusive logic of the "recognition" and "status" in the 20th century German sociology community，To better understand the selection and reputation mechanism of this field。

　　Bet365 lotto review

For many scholars，Published a paper、Publishing works、The recognition obtained by being cited by the peers is not enough，They also hope that they will become the "influential" of the discipline and even have been included in textbooks，Provide inspiration for future digital generations。As for how to achieve this goal? Holzhozawa thinks，Examining the "classic" process of the academic world in the past may find some clues。

Holzhozer said，Acknowledge bet365 best casino games and status interrelated，It can be regarded as "symbolic capital" that French sociologist Pierre Burdieu said。According to Burdie's theory，Under the cumulative effect, high recognition and status are usually accompanied by a large amount of capital，This will cause further accumulation，A competitive advantage for a long time。Under extreme circumstances，A field may be seriously layered，Acknowledges to recognize very little at the bottom，There are many recognitions obtained on the top level。In the ideal scientific community，Recognition and status are the embodiment of academic achievements，It increases the "visible" of scholars，Social network is expanded。That is to say，Acknowledged mainly related to cultural capital (that is, the skills of production knowledge)，"Classic" is the result of screening based on cultural capital，Social capital (if influential social positions) are the products of recognition and status rather than means。But，The scientific community in reality，Cultural capital is not always the only basis for status distribution，Social positions that do not necessarily be connected with academic achievements、Gender and other aspects will also work。

To understand whether a sociologist can become a "classic" in order，Holzhozawa analyzed the references of 957 sociologists living in the 20th century in the German literature。where，909 men、35 women，Another 13 people cannot judge gender。Holzhozer said，The huge gap between bet365 Play online games the proportion of men and women is not surprising。Early 20th Century，Women's academic research is still rare。She created two data sets，Basic Data Group includes all scholars in the Concise Social Dictionary，The classic data group contains all scholars who have been given "classic" status in "Sociology Classics"。"Concise Social Dictionary" was published in 1931，It has a significant impact on the establishment of modern German sociology; "Sociology Classics" has two versions，Published in the 1970s and 1990s, respectively，Was used in sociological teaching in German universities，It is also used for classic research。Subsequent，She compares the two data groups，To explore the formation trajectory of "classic" and promote factors。

　Cultural capital is the key to "classic"

Holzhozer discovered，As early as 1931，The German sociological community has already appeared in the recognition and status.。Among 957 sociologists，83%(792 people) The number of reference pages is 1 or 2，Only 6%(55 people) are referenced by more than 5，2%(18 people) The number of reference pages exceeds 10。Among these 957 people，20 people at the time or later served as a member of the German Sociology Association，The average number of reference pages of their references is 8。Generally speaking，High recognition (number of reference pages) presents positive correlation with high social positions (members of the society)。

Comparison analysis results show，Only 1.25%-1.4%of sociologists become "classic"bet365 live casino games ，and the vast majority of people will be forgotten。Because "Sociology Classics" is only included in male scholars，No female sociologist becomes "classic"。Scholars with the number of reference pages of 6-10 and 1-5 have become "classic".，Scholars with significantly lower than 10 reference pages (30%-40%become "classic")。Visible，Academic achievements are highly recognized, it is very helpful to become "classic"。In terms of social positions，Member of the German Sociology Association will not significantly increase the probability of becoming "classic"。So，Overall，The key to the "classic" of the German sociological community in the 20th century is the accumulation of cultural capital; social capital may temporarily bring high recognition，But it will not last for a long time。

From a gender perspective，Although at least 3%of the scholars included in the Concise Social Dictionary are women，But until 2000，Female sociologists enter the "Classic" ranks。And，They are included in the category of "classic", not from the recognition of historical continuity，But some kind of "knowledge archeology" selectively discovered them。For example，The work published in 1998 "Female founder: Sociology and Social Theory (1830-1930)" introduced 15 outstanding female sociologists and their works from 19th to early 20th century。​​Push over time，More female scholars have been recognized，But the absolute quantity still lags behind male peers。

　Trial academic evaluation standards through "classic"

bet365 Play online games Holzhozawa told this reporter，Although there are no large amounts of evidence at present，But I can imagine，The mode she observes is not limited to sociology or Germany。Scientific research is a common career，The rules that determine the academic reputation are in the scientific community of various countries (at least Western countries)、Application in the same way in various research areas。Other theoretical and empirical studies show，The phenomenon described by Holzhozer may exist wide。For example，Professor of Paris Institute of Technology, France, and Andrew Abbott, a professor of sociology at the University of Chicago, in 2016, "French Society: French Society: French Society Acceptance of scholars in the United States (1970-2012)，Examination of the previous 40 years of French sociologists' ideas for American sociologists，and found in a 200 -person sample，Only a few scholars have received great attention，Others are almost "invisible"。

In recent decades，A significant increase in female scholars。improves with gender equality、Feminism and post -colonialism flourish，Approve and status allocation practice will slowly change，But after a long period of time, it can be reflected in the quotation of literature，It is not easy to reverse because of the old mode。，Holzhozawa also analyzed the title of female sociologists in German academic works since the second half of the 20th century。Results show，Female scholars are still insufficient，This bet365 Play online games is a contrast with the progress trend of gender equality in the late 20th century。

Another，The recognition and status distribution of humanities and social sciences is largely different from natural science。In the field of natural science，Is the appropriate judgment standard for scientific descriptions more objective。Experimental methods of natural science help obtain evidence of derived from causality。In the field of humanities and social sciences，The interpretation of the world is guided by theory，It is less limited by the material world，Evaluation standards for scientific research results are more free。So，Social value and social reputation have a greater impact on recognition and status distribution。

From the view of Holzhozawa，The scientific community is very necessary to review the definition and recognition of academic achievements，Because in the long run,，Different strategies may create a completely different scientific research ecology。For example，Many extremely important scientific discoveries will only have an impact after several years，Therefore, it is not easy to obtain recognition in a shorter academic evaluation cycle。Another example，If you only follow the essay of scholars、Journal influence factor，The reward may be concentrated to scholars who have certain influence in one field，Innovation of the theory and methods。The scientific community needs to discuss the appropriate standards of academic evaluation and reach a consensus，to make the distribution bet365 live casino games process of recognition and reputation more clear and transparent。