The scientific research system should be committed to providing diversity for different audiences、The scientific research results of multi -language。Although some researchers promoted the research results of the output of multi -language，But the traditional scientific research evaluation system has not provided good conditions for it。December 7，The official website of the London School of Political Economics and Economics published an article written by Janne P? 觟 L? 觟 Nen, Secretary -General of the Publishing Forum of the Finnish Academic Group Federation.，The article takes the Reform Report Report Report on the Recent Research Evaluation System recently released by the European Commission as an example，Reveal the lack of multi -language in this agenda，and the damage to the high quality and public research caused by it。

　　bet365 Play online games

Sharing the research results with the global audience is one of the important goals of the academic world。Beluning said，If research can only spread through the language bet365 Play online games of English，The dissemination of scientific research results is bound to be greatly reduced，This is particularly obvious during the new crown pneumonia epidemic。Whether in Europe or the whole world，Demand for academic exchanges of multi -language species day prosperous，This is not only reflected in scholars，The transmission of research results to policy makers、The process of professionals and ordinary people is the same。In recent years，"Responsible Research and Innovation" (RRI) concept proposed by European scholars and initiatives such as "Open Science" have called for the acquisition of research results，Enhance the communication and interaction between the academic and society。This wish is only possible to achieve it only when using multiple languages ​​to communicate，Among them, both include written language，Also includes oral words。

People gradually realize，Multi -language can promote the diversification of scientific research，help to ensure the regional correlation and acquisition of scientific research。Starting from the "San Francisco Research Evaluation Declaration" in 2012，The academic community is proposed，"Responsible Evaluation System" should include "research results、Diversity of activities bet365 best casino games and influence "this element。2015，"Nature" journal published "Lyon Declaration on Scientific Research Indicators"，It is recommended to protect the scientific research results related to the local area，Reminds not to put the English publications and excellent results of those with high influence factor。2019，Finnish University、Norwegian University and other institutions initiated the "Herbinky Initiative about the Diverse Language of Academic Exchange"，Promote the use of multi -language in academic exchanges，and formulated two main goals: First, to ensure that in the process of expert evaluation，No matter published language、How about channels，High -quality research can be valued; the second is to ensure that when using indicators -based evaluation systems，Fully consider journal and book publications of various languages。

Reform of the scientific research evaluation system can improve the quality and influence of research，Its importance is increasingly prominent。But，Reform requires the overall change of culture and system，This is a very complicated and slow process。From March -November 2021，The EU Commission has accelerated this process and promoted the transformation to consult various stakeholders，and formed a report，The bet365 live casino games consultation results of the consultation、Reform target，and proposed a solution to coordination。All of this is based on the principles and actions of the research funders and executive agencies。The report gets rid of the study、Publication and indicators' focus，Aiming to reform the scientific research evaluation system，Encourage extensive open scientific practice，Acknowledge a variety of forms of academic output、Activity and influence，Differences between different fields。But，The use of multi -language is ignored。

　　Avoid language prejudice

Opinions of peer review reflect language prejudice。Some non -English mother tongue scholars said，Some reviewers will judge their research based on their English writing quality instead of content，My own research will not get a fair evaluation。Therefore，The selection and language skills of the reviewer should become the focus of various types of evaluation mechanisms。European University Association、A joint statement issued by the University of Finland and the University of Norway，The use of multiple languages ​​is especially important for Europe，Because European research has geography、Features of cultural and language diversity。In fact，There Bet365 app download are 24 official working languages ​​in the EU。According to the "Europeans and Language Reports" released in 2012，Almost half of the Europeans cannot use non -native tongue for dialogue，Only 38%of people can dialogue in English。

Multi -language and language diversity is also a question of rights。Article 27 of the United Nations Declaration of Human Rights，Everyone has the right to freely participate in the cultural life of society，Enjoy art，and share scientific progress and the benefits it produced。The "EU Basic Rights Charter" also stipulates that the EU has the obligation to respect the diversity of language，and prohibit discrimination against language。The EU Commission has formulated a strong multi -language policy，To promote the overall language learning and language diversity in Europe。But，This policy does not really realize multi -language in science、Value in research and innovation。

The 41st meeting of the UNESCO Conference was held on November 9-24, 2021，During this period，The "Open Scientific Suggestion" showed by the meeting showed，One of the main goals of open science is to allow everyone to openly obtain and continue to use multi -language scientific knowledge。"Open Scientific Suggestion" suggests that member Bet365 lotto review states are in scientific practice、A variety of languages ​​are encouraged to encourage participants in scientific publications and academic exchanges。Under the ideal circumstances，Language should not become a problem in academic evaluation。Researchers should get corresponding recognition and rewards based on their research results and influence，No matter what the language is published。

But，In practice，Evaluation standards and methods are often affected by language bias。Beluning Suggestion，If you want to achieve the above types of initiatives，Promote fairness、Diverse and tolerant academic atmosphere，and provide multi -language knowledge for various departments of the society，The reform of the scientific research evaluation system in Europe must pay attention to and solve the problems caused by language prejudice。