The US "Social Science Space" website published on April 8 the researcher Ben Kasstan, a researcher at the University of Bristol University in the United Kingdom、Researcher Rishita Nandagiri and others at the School of Political Economics, London, "New Crown Pneumonic Pneumonia's Ethics, indicates that we must reshape the Edit Ethics in Academic Publication"。Article thinks，During the epidemic of new crown pneumonia，Scientific researchers must pay special attention to complying with ethical principles when working on work; academic journals must also set up strict ethical standards，Based on this judge and provide guidelines for the contribution。

　　bet365 Play online games

Castan and others talk about，The epidemic has increased people's demand for scientific discovery and innovation，It also enables more scientific research activities and output to conduct in the background of the epidemic。This has caused tremendous pressure to scientific workers and academic publishing institutions，Let academic writing、Scientific research cooperation and the choice of research audience have been affected。Academic publications and academic information release platforms sometimes appear "cognitive non -righteousness"，As bet365 live casino games a result, intellectual producers and recipients on the edge position encounter structural exclusion。Cognitive non -righteousness refers to a specific gender、race、clan、Social background、Angel Cognitive Capability Disputes of Factors and other factors。So，Facing a special challenge to promote scientific cause during the epidemic，The scientific and academic publishing industries need to improve ethical standards。Otherwise，Academic misconduct and academic injustice may appear more frequently，Then exacerbate uneven global scientific research output，Weaken scientific reliability and credibility。

According to Castan and others,，2021，A scholar's field research summary，The characters appearing in the scene photos have not maintained a safe social distance，No protective supplies such as masks。They think，During the epidemic period, face -to -face research is not suspected of ethics，Academic Editing allows such content to be publicly published.。Academic publishing plays an important guarantee role in ensuring that knowledge production meets ethics and morality。So，Castan and others call on the academic publishing industry to discuss the responsibilities of this industry in the academic publishing industry.，Especially when dealing with the results of social science research using field survey methods，For example, global hygiene、Development、Research in the fields of anthropology。Bet365 app download This kind of research often develops in different regions and countries for different people，Traditionally involved a lot of face -to -face contact。

　　Academic journals have scientific research ethics, liability

Castan and others made three suggestions for academic publishing practitioners。First，Academic journals can set up the "epidemic ethics" section on the official website，Publicly notify the content of "Ethics Ethics" related to this magazine，Put forward the requirements and expectations of the contribution。such as，It can be required that the contribution will explain that he has conducted an epidemic risk assessment on the place of research before conducting research，and incorporate the evaluation results into the research design; in the research process, comply with the regulations for epidemic prevention in the area，and take the necessary protection measures。

Scientific research institutions generally have an institutional review committee or ethical review committee，Responsible for reviewing and supervising whether the research involved in human subjects follow ethical specifications，Its purpose is to protect the subject's rights and interests。Contributors should not only explain that their research has passed the approval of the institutional review committee，It should also explain whether it has obtained other ethical approval based on changes in the situation of the occurrence of the place of epidemic.。To make the bet365 best casino games information open and transparent，Journal can provide additional layout space，Allow the submitters to explain the ethical conservation involved in its research，This is similar to the method of research funding at the end of the article。

Second，Editing academic journal shall further review the study approved by the institutional review committee before the epidemic occurs，If the detailed "epidemic ethics" information is missing，Replenish information should be contacted by the contribution。Edit should be completed after this link，Then submit the manuscript to the peer reviewer。The published manuscript Once the published manuscript is found to violate the "epidemic ethics" regulations violated with epidemic prevention policies and regulations or journals，It should be submitted to the Journal Editorial Committee for review and explained according to the contribution，Published a statement or withdrawal。Journal editors shall request the designed person to explain the necessity of face -to -face research during the epidemic。Given that the risk of virus mutation is still higher，Contributors should explain why offline instead of online research methods。

The epidemic has prompted many researchers to turn to online research，The ethical issues of academic circles are conducting extensive discussions on the ethical issues of online research。such as，The "2021 Good Research and Practice Ethics Guidelines" Bet365 app download released by the British Social Anthropology Association，A file to obtain online does not mean that it can be used as research data without any restrictions。Anthropologists are conducting digital ethnic history research or using online documents that already exist in the public field、Video、Picture、Recording and other information，Ethical responsibilities and intellectual property issues related to the content of data should be considered。and，Journal editors need to pay attention，Online research also needs to be approved by the institutional review committee。

third，The epidemic leads to a limited time in international travel，Scientific researchers in the northern countries often choose remote research，Relying on scientific researchers in Southern countries to collect data、Complete field survey。If "Ethics Ethics" is ignored in this process，Southern scholars and research participants are facing safety and health risks。Some countries have gradually canceled strict epidemic prevention and control measures，But this does not mean that the restoration of conventional face -to -face research will inevitably meet ethics。No matter what kind of contract does offline interpersonal contact and travel，It is necessary to record in detail and publicly study the extent to how much the scholars and research participants participated in the formulation of protective measures in the research process、bet365 Play online games Do they agree with the protection measures。The transparentness as "Ethics Ethics" is equally important is the author's identity transparent，That is, the contributor should clearly stated that the data collection staff and field investigators should be analyzed in data analysis、The contribution made in the article writing。

In addition，There is gender and racial inequality in the field of academic publishing，And early professional scholars、Employment status In unstable scholars' influence is particularly obvious。Academic journals can help these scholars follow ethical specifications through transparency requirements，Let them participate in the opinion process of "Ethics Ethics"。

Castan and others summarize，Academic journals are responsible for supervising scientific researchers to be responsible for their research，and play an important role in the establishment of scientific research ethical standards，As a result, cognitive non -righteousness is reduced within the scope of academic publishing。Although the urgency of knowledge production during the epidemic is abruptly rising，Academic publishing institutions cannot relax the review of scientific research results。Castan and others hope，The above suggestions can stimulate more thinking and exploration of academic publishing ethics during the epidemic period，Avoid the flood of cognitive non -righteousness in scientific research。