bet365 live casino games With the development of social scientific research，Whether it is qualitative research or quantitative research，More and more need participants who need researchers。July 11，The Honorary Senior Researcher Helen Kara, a Honorary Senior Researcher at the University of Manchester, the University of Manchester, issued a post on the official website of the School of Political Economics, London，Researchers other than researchers are usually passively presented in the research results as research objects。With the development of the times，Definition of research participants' ways are out of date，To explore new methods to highlight the importance of research participants in research。

In almost all disciplines，Researchers' views and attitudes of research participants are no longer appropriate。In addition to the use of "participants" and "common researchers" and other more suitable identity terms，Cara thinks，You can make researchers more respectful and assisted in researching people。First, replace the "knowledge consent" with the authorization of risk assessment; the second is the time and professional knowledge contributed by the participants to the research institute; the third is to support the participants to decide whether to be anonymous。

Bet365 app download Current，The development of the Internet promotes the spread of research results，At the same time, it also enables people to use research data and research results in various ways，And this is unpredictable。other，Researchers now also require researchers to store data in an open access，For other personnel to re -analyze and reuse，But the same，We cannot predict the process and details of the data reused。Only consider the above two situations，The principle of "knowing consent" is difficult to achieve。Cara thinks，What researchers need to do is to figure out how to authorize potential research participants to evaluate the risks that will face the research，And support them to make the best decision according bet365 best casino games to personal circumstances。

From the perspective of research participants，Reward is often the best return，In exchange for the time and professional knowledge that they contribute to the research project。Of course，Reward is not necessarily suitable for each participant or every research project。Some participants cannot accept one -time or occasional rewards，Because it will have adverse effects on their taxation and enjoying national benefits。At the same time，Some researchers have not paid funds for participants' fees。No matter what，We can no longer ask people to pay time and professional knowledge for free，Although the current remuneration payment mechanism is unstable，But it is also a good start that can benefit bet365 best casino games research participants。

Support participants decide whether to be anonymous to give participants more choices。Current，Many studies to protect research participants，Usually anonymous way，But from the actual point of view，Anonymous does not provide real protection for the participants。other，Some participants hope that their real names can appear in the research results，Leave a trace that I have contributed to research。Kara Suggestion，Researchers need to discuss the advantages and disadvantages of anonymous with research participants，Then let it decide whether to show the real name in the study。

　　（Wang Junmei/Compilation）