Discipline History of Political Science Studies Yuanyuan，Methods adopted also diverse。But the previous research emphasizes the knowledge products in the field of discipline，"Academic" focusing on the results of research and ignoring the "scholar" of political scholars，Start with the academic life course of representative political scholars，History of Disciplinary Development of Political Science。Actually，Discipline History as the history of the discipline，Its main body not only academic，Should be learned，Study the history of political life consisting of people's political life is especially like this。

　Bet365 lotto review

Qian Mu once said, "History talk about personnel，Personnel should be people -oriented，Things are deputy。"" In the research of existing subject history，More focused on the academic expression of scholars and the context of its era，The academic life course of the scholar is not used as a research method of discipline history。Taking the academic life history as a research method of discipline，There is a huge potential for breaking through the research on the study of previous discipline history。

Simple subject history research，often take academic itself as the starting point，Focus on the research of theoretical systemization and discipline systemization research，Live politics bet365 live casino games in the process of disciplinary development、Economy、Cultural and other factors affect，It is difficult to show the complete subject historical development path。In the theoretical systemization research，Mainly based on the theoretical connotation of the core concept of the discipline as the research focus，For internal academic concepts of the subject、The generation of terms、Evolution for research。In the study of discipline system，It mainly includes universities and scientific research institutions engaged in related research、Academic Journal、Disciplinary Management System、Disciplinary evaluation system, etc.。Theoretical narrative is often based on the academic itself，More tendency to tend to the history of academic thought，Ignore the development characteristics of the discipline，illegitimate game and compromise between the external environment and academic autonomy;，Focus on changes in the subject system，Although the impact of external forces on the disciplinary system，But often in the discipline itself，Research field of vision narrow。

Therefore，Disciplinary history research must surpass the subject itself，Pay attention to the external environment of discipline development。As A. Elzinaga (A. Elzinaga) observed，The reputation control system for the development of the discipline is being separated from the subject itself，and "more vulnerable to external regulation of government policies and management policies"。This is because of，Academic Bet365 app download research has always endured continuous pressure，It is required to meet the intentions of political and administrative decision -making agencies，At the same time, you have to face pressure from the market，such as micro electrons、Emerging technologies such as biotechnology must rely on the development of related disciplines。The first pressure tries to make academic research "political" or "socialization"，This produces "social functionalization based on external management measures and control measures"; the second pressure may lead to "commercialization" or "privatization" of academic research。If you are only focused on the development of the subject，Ignore the external environment and impact in the process of discipline development，It may be difficult to fully and objectively present the history of discipline development。

As reminded by S. Rothblatt，External intervention in the decision -making of academic research activities is too large，Will gradually weaken the professional knowledge of academic people。In fact，Academic autonomy is one of the goals of discipline development，If it is too easy to allow society and external pressure to play a role，The freedom of the freedom of academic discussion may be inhibited。other，A single administrative management of the discipline，It will also actually limit the creativity of academics。and take the academic life process of scholars as research methods of subject history，Take the academic life history of scholars as a research carrier，Not Bet365 lotto review only can it show the impact of the external environment on academic activities，It can also highlight the role of internal academic circles for discipline development，The self -tension of academic autonomy in "administrative" and "marketization"。

　　Steering from academic to academic methodology

Back off from the narrow discipline，Realize the methodology from academic to scholars，It means to highlight the main role of people，The knowledge of the knowledge of returning to the life of scholars。Choose an important academic person as a research object，exhausting related literature，Restoring what the character experienced the life，Things I imagined in my life，Form the course of academic life，From this to show the trajectory and development of the history of the subject。Through the academic history of scholars, you can not only see the history of life and his subject knowledge inheritance，You can also reflect the subject form、Disciplinary knowledge development and the change of academic discourse system，Reflects the interaction of discipline and social environment。So，Scholars' academic life course Research is an important path to examine the traditional changes of discipline knowledge。

The academic life course of the scholar is closely related to the development of the subject itself。The relationship between scholars and disciplines in the academic world，There are two main points of view: one thinks that disciplines are formed first，Then restrict its follower，Make it a certain type of scholar (social perspective of discipline)Bet365 app download 。For example, the discipline historians such as Li Huber and C.Greed think，Disciplinary origin and individual characteristics have a huge impact on the early research choices of individuals。A kind of scholars choose a certain type of discipline，and make some characteristics (predictive view)。For example, B. Clark thinks，Disciplinary professional model based on the personal background of the researcher and previous experience，It is not important for subsequent research attitudes and behaviors。Both views are too absolute，It is believed that the course of academic life is subject to a series of accidental factors，None of these factors occupy the dominant position。

Discussion on learning methods and personality characteristics in recent years，More evidence of Clark's point of view，That is, the current actual situation is more important than any relatively fixed cause。Research indicates，Learning method is subject to the course content、Test methods and teaching methods，Not static。But how about the relationship between the academic life history of scholars and the history of the development of the subject，The essence of its close connection cannot be changed，Whether it is the influence of the discipline on scholars or the opposite，All research on the course of academic life can be regarded as methods for research on subject history。

Through the academic life process of the scholar，Especially academic life journey of academic leaders and academic goalkeepers，You can intuitively reflect the subject form、Disciplinary knowledge development Bet365 app download and changes in academic discourse。It can be said，Change in the direction of subject research，Depending on the orientation type of the "academic leader" that dominates the discipline。Academic goalkeeper，then determines who can enter or should be rejected by a specific research field，It can be said that it has mastered the power in the discipline。R. Whitley pointed out，"In academic circles，Power is regarded as an authoritative subsidiary "。Because of，The level of academic quality is judged by those who have become the elites of the academic world，They have a great influence on the operation of internal judgment standards of the subject。For those who want to make progress in their academic lives，For scholars who need to be recognized，Undoubtedly to abide by these standards。So，The academic journey of these representative scholars，It is the epitome of the history of discipline development。

Modern Discipline Development, including politics，It is both the result of the differentiation of the knowledge system，It is also a product set by the education system，Not a pure academic evolution process，must be received from politics、Economy、The influence of multiple factors such as culture。Through the academic life of the academic person，History of the development of discipline，The feasibility of existing theory，It also contains the necessity of subject research，More for the scholars in the discipline、Responsibility for academic development has earnest expectations。

　(Author Unit: School of Political and Public Management of South China Normal University)