Social Science Research Influence Evaluation New Mode
June 12, 2019 09:12 Source: "China Social Sciences" June 12, 2019, Total No. 1711 Author: Reporter Wang Xiaozhen

With the development of the times,The method of evaluating the influence of social science research also needs to be updated urgently。For this,American Independence Academic and Professional Publishing Group Shizhe Publishing Company (SAGE PUBLISHING) recently released a research report。

This entitled "The Latest Thinking About Metrics For Research IMPACT in the Social Sciences" is proposed,The traditional evaluation criteria for influence of "Literator-Based" (LITERATURE-BASED) are not enough to meet modern needs,The reference situation in other academic works cannot fully display the value of social science research outside the academic world,Therefore, you need to find a new influence evaluation method。other,The progress of new technology provides possible for exploring new evaluation methods。Shizhe Publishing Company Global Publishing Chairman Ziyad Marar said,The best time to find the method of improving bet365 Play online games the influential evaluation of social science research has arrived,New evaluation methods should be promoted globally,Promote the development of social science。

 bet365 Play online games

The completion of the report benefits from the research results of the previous seminar。At the meeting,Google Scholar co -founder Anurag Acharya、Betsy Rajala、Social Science Research Council project director Jason Rhody (Jason Rhody) and other experts and scholars have generally classified the interests of the influence evaluation of social science research,Discussion of four evaluation modes,Suggestions on how to improve the evaluation method in the future。

In the report,Acaya and others discussed the four modes that can be adopted by evaluating the influence of social science research。

First, academic output mode (Academic Outputs Model)。This is one of the most commonly used methods for evaluating social science research,That is to judge the academic value of the research results with the help of reference。

Second, the person-made mode (Person-Centered Model)。The focus of this mode focuses on the researcher itself,instead of analyzing analysis from the perspective of text。The analysis method Bet365 lotto review includes tracking the inauguration unit of researchers、Innovative projects participating in the participation。This model can explore the actual conversion of the researcher's academic thought and its impact on the world。

Three is the four phenomenon limit mode (Four Quadrants Model)。This mode is suitable for researchers with multiple effects of results,Through the four dimensions of "academic", "industry", "society" and "public", more comprehensively depicts the academic impact of researchers。

Fourth is the Pragmatic Model。Many issues on the influence of research are open and abstract,From the perspective of practicality,Researchers need to consider how to make the funders confident that the research project they invested can eventually have a large academic impact。

It can be seen that different evaluation modes have their own focus.

Report summary to,The influence evaluation system that is generally accepted by the academic community needs to pay attention to the following points: to ensure that the new influence indicators of the academic community are useful and beneficial to society; "Evaluation system,But must surpass the system; the new evaluation system must consider the bet365 Play online games influence definition of stakeholders; those related stakeholders must understand,Although the influence of social sciences can be evaluated,But social science is not natural science after all、Technology、Engineering and Mathematics (STEM) and other disciplines,Social science can learn from the evaluation method of STEM discipline,But uncomfortable; you need to use global vocabulary、Classification method、metadata and benchmark,To explore the influence evaluation of social scientific research。

  Start from many aspects to improve

Based on the analysis and summary of different evaluation models,Acaya and others on how to improve the influence evaluation method of social science research in the future,I have proposed a number of specific action suggestions。

First of all, it is a 10 -year influence report on the results of social science research。Acaya and others think,The reference indicators adopted at present are suitable for the works published in the past 3-5 years。They suggest,Published 10 years ago,But the works that are still used in the past 10 years or recently used。Although this is also based on the referenced Bet365 app download influence evaluation method,But being able to reward those areas of the field、Academic contribution of long -term influence。This recommended feasibility is high,It also provides a window for tracking and understanding the development of research。

Followed by improving the research results publishing system,Help the indexer (indexers) to better identify and track social science citations。Report said,Some online academic service platforms can track the references of research results in different methods,But some of the reference methods in the results of social science research cause difficulties in tracking,It will lead to missing tracing。Report Suggestion,Social science scholars should change the quotation habit,In the writing, the reference is clearly listed,instead of hidden in the text; publishers also need to publish research results in accordance with this rule。

again,Collaborative Construction Metadata Model。Uniformly use a set of standardized language,Help scholars conduct a comparative study,and found the trend presented with changes in time。

other,Report also recommended,Exploitation on the literature on the influence of social bet365 Play online games science research,Partial funding of other disciplines to the discipline of social sciences。The report also requires research funders to use general formats,Let's indicate the content of the funding、Funding object、funding amount and funding time limit。This helps integrate funding information,and then guide the subject to explain the impact of the funding institute。This is easy to achieve technically,But requires the cooperation of the group。

Report proposed,The discussion on the influence of social science research has just begun,need to be further expanded for further,To better deal with a series of social challenges。

Editor in charge: Cui Cen
QR code icons 2.jpg
Key recommendation
The latest article
Graphics
bet365 live casino games
Video

Friendship link: Official website of the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences |

Website filing number: Jinggong.com Anxie 11010502030146 Ministry of Industry and Information Technology: Beijing ICP No. 11013869

All rights reserved by China Social Sciences Magazine shall not be reprinted and used without permission

General Editor Email: zzszbj@126.com This website Contact information: 010-85886809 Address: 11-12, Building 1, Building 1, No. 15, Guanghua Road, Chaoyang District, Beijing: 100026