Now，Changes in social interactions have changed the context and frequency of arguments，Also triggered a rethinking of reasoning and argumentation。Recently，The academic seminar on "bet365 tennis bet and Argument in the Context of the Intelligent Era" was held at Zhejiang University，Participating scholars conducted extensive and in-depth exchanges on the phenomenon of real debate and intelligent debate behavior in the context of the intelligent era。

　Systematic Inquiry bet365 tennis bet Methodology

In the opinion of Huang Huaxin, director of the Language and Cognition Research Center of Zhejiang University，We should continue to uphold the principle of "never forget the original roots"、Absorb foreigners、The logical concept of "facing the future"，Follow "From Science、Go to science，From life、The great bet365 tennis bet of "go into life"，Let the road of bet365 tennis bet become wider and wider。

Talking about the evaluation of arguments and the selection of arguments，Liang Qingyin, professor at the Institute of bet365 tennis bet and Cognition at Sun Yat-sen University, thinks，Compared with the "effective argument" that formal bet365 tennis bet focuses on，The "good argument" requirements that informal bet365 tennis bet is concerned with do not need to be checked from the perspective of logical validity，So the evaluation is more complicated。

Drawing on the research paradigm of contemporary scientific bet365 tennis bet，Proposed by Zhang Jianjun, Professor of Philosophy Department of Nanjing University，The main purpose of research on argumentation bet365 tennis bet should be to systematically explore the bet365 tennis bet application methodology in actual argumentation，In particular, explore methodological models and procedures that have certain operability，Truly “turn theory into method”，Grasp the reasonable positioning and development direction of argumentation bet365 tennis bet。

　Looking for new paths in argument theory bet365 tennis bet

Professor Zhai Jincheng from the School of Philosophy of Nankai University reviewed Aristotle’s research approach、Leibniz’s formal argument and some more complex formal theories after the 1970s。He proposed，The progress and evolution direction of argumentation theory should be viewed from the perspective of bet365 tennis bet，Looking for new ways to study argumentation theory。

Ancient China produced a series of classic works rich in bet365 tennis bet。Du Guoping, a researcher at the Institute of Philosophy, Chinese Academy of Social Sciences, thinks，"The Great Learning" and "The Doctrine of the Mean" are classic argumentation chapters，It’s about clarifying the concept、There are some relatively fixed methods for accurate judgment，And it shows a relatively clear pattern in terms of argumentation methods and argumentation structure。

Talking about the connection between abductive reasoning and creative thinking，Jin Li, Professor of Philosophy Department of Zhejiang University, thinks，As the awareness of innovation continues to increase in the smart era，The public has high expectations for the role that bet365 tennis bet, especially informal bet365 tennis bet, may play in creative thinking。

Jin Rongdong, Professor of Philosophy Department of East China Normal University, is in Peirce、Toulmin、The concept of “reasoning guarantee mechanism” was proposed based on the views of scholars such as Hitchcock。He thinks，The inference guarantee mechanism can ensure that the conclusion is reasonably drawn from the premises、Principles or procedures。Research in this area will help clarify the respective characteristics of Chinese and Western bet365 tennis bet，Helps to deepen the understanding of the topic of "bet365 tennis bet and Culture"。

　Focus on reality bet365 tennis bet

Rich and colorful real debates in daily life，Provides natural materials for theoretical research。Law is one of the fields where argumentation is most fully demonstrated。Xiong Minghui, a professor at the Institute of bet365 tennis bet and Cognition at Sun Yat-sen University, based on the litigation situation，Propose a new view of evidence called the "evidence game view"。He thinks，Differences in the selection and presentation order of evidence will lead to differences in the referee results。Professor Kong Hong, School of Humanities, China University of Political Science and Law, compared the coverage argument from the perspective of judicial argument、Argument by analogy、The three argumentation modes of negative argument have different emphasis on the applicability of legal rules。Kong Hong thinks，Based on the similarity between the type of case facts and legal rules、Dependent and undetermined relationships，Different argument types require clarification at the level of logical methods。

Looking forward to the future development of bet365 tennis bet，Zhang Jianjun takes debate theory as an example，Proposed three suggestions。First, establish the value orientation of seeking truth。bet365 tennis bet pursues truth，The achievement of any achievement should be oriented to its theoretical value and practical significance in the discipline of bet365 tennis bet and society。The second is to focus on methodological research on basic bet365 tennis bet theory，Argumentation bet365 tennis bet、Argumentation theory and so on can be introduced into the research paradigm of contemporary "scientific bet365 tennis bet"。The third is on the basis of learning from excellent foreign theories，Based on one’s own unique cultural traditions and ideological wealth，Formation through ancient China、Modern and contemporary logical context，Continuously increase one’s own academic accumulation。

The conference is hosted by the Linguistic bet365 tennis bet Professional Committee of the Chinese bet365 tennis bet Society，Hosted by the Language and Cognition Research Center of Zhejiang University。