Since mid-2016、The State Council issued the "National Informatization Development Strategy Outline"，The construction of "smart courts" has been clearly listed as the beginning of the national informatization development strategy，my country’s judicial informatization reform has officially entered a stage of substantial development。The core construction foundation of smart justice is the use of big bet365 voucher、New information technology represented by artificial intelligence，To achieve judicial goals that are difficult to achieve with traditional legal technology and concepts。New intelligent technology applied to justice，Improved investigation efficiency，Simplified litigation procedures，Saved litigation costs，Brings many new trends to the legal profession；Meanwhile，The relationship between the operational essence of such technology and legal thinking must be properly handled。

1st，bet365 voucher modeling and legal evolution。The core of new intelligent technology applications，It lies in evaluating and predicting the development of specific things，To guide the next decision-making。The theoretical basis for the predictive function of intelligent technology is，Most human behaviors are subject to laws、Models and principles and rules，Smart technology relies on huge information bet365 voucher，Start from known knowledge (features)，Use mathematical calculation methods such as probability and statistics to find the laws of the operation and development of things。However，When conclusions based on historical bet365 voucher are generated and guide decision making，The new decision will be used as historical bet365 voucher to become the bet365 voucher basis for the next decision-making... the cycle starts again，The types of information guiding decision-making become increasingly similar，Information channels will also tend to be single。This is exactly contrary to the legal process。The law will not lie forever within the framework preset by legislation，With the continuous development of society，People’s lifestyles and ideas continue to change，Old legal norms are repealed or amended，And new legal norms that are more in line with people’s behavioral practices were formulated。Because the evolution of law incorporates a lot of politics、Economy、Fresh factors such as culture，Its forward mode of constantly absorbing new variables is exactly opposite to the "old-fashioned" direction of continuous debugging of bet365 voucher modeling。

Second，bet365 voucher association and legal interpretation。Schoenberg and Cukier in their book "Big bet365 voucher: Life"、Great changes in work and thinking" clearly stated，Big bet365 voucher calculations only focus on conclusions，No need to clarify causal relationship，Therefore the relationship between bet365 voucher is just association。To this，Australian scholar Janet Chan gave an analogy: for an equation，Y is a factor of Z，Z can be changed by adjusting Y，That is, when Y is replaced by a new factor Y'，The Z value becomes the result of Y'；The application of big bet365 voucher does not require proof of causality，This means，As long as the Z value remains unchanged，Even if the bet365 voucher in the Y factor set changes，There is no way of knowing what kind of changes have occurred。So，Want to use intelligent technology to study a certain social phenomenon，Thus promoting the process of rule of law，More difficult，Because the bet365 voucher presents the results in a "simple" way。The difference is，One of the most outstanding features of law is the diversity of interpretations。Although the interpretation of laws follows certain standards and principles，But there is no constant conclusion，There is also an expanded explanation、Restriction explanation，Even the emergence of law-making by judges in case law。For example，When social development requires the interpretation of game equipment as "property"，Smart technology cannot clarify the causal relationship between the two by relying on old experience，Then applying this technology to judicial decisions will lead to fallacies。

　Third，bet365 voucher prediction and specification application。American scholar Bernard Harcourt pointed out，Forecasting with decisions based on correlations with historical bet365 voucher，A feedback loop will be formed，Thereby weakening or destroying the influence of disturbing factors，This interference factor is often the key to improving decision-making。This also means，If no external fresh factors are continuously entered into the database，Relying only on intelligent technology for self-calculation，The final prediction results will easily stagnate。Since this operation mode emphasizes the observance of general rules，Exclude unexpected variable factors，Ultimately or possibly lead to rejection of diversity。However，Diversity is the key to coping with unpredictable changes in environmental conditions，Excessive behavioral consistency will increase the risk of system operation。Therefore，When bet365 voucher operations are applied to judicial decisions，You need to be alert to the risk that excessive consistency may lead to judicial rigidity or even stagnant social development。Information，Judicial rulings and application of norms are by no means intended to exclude minority dissent，It is based on the common interests of most social groups，Taking care of the few、Voices of disadvantaged groups，The process of continuous improvement。The operating essence of intelligent technology is based on continuous learning from experience，Easily eliminate “noise” in the application of law，There is a certain tension between the two。

　Fourth，bet365 voucher decision-making and judicial ruling。Because large bet365 voucher sets cannot display all bet365 voucher and calculation processes，Therefore the operation results are usually presented in charts，However, the process of converting bet365 voucher results into charts，But there is a hidden risk of losing key bet365 voucher。And the conversion of bet365 voucher is extremely complicated、Multiple levels，The conversion in one of the links is wrong，After many steps of conversion，This error may be magnified countless times。In addition，The presentation of operation results also requires more complex semantic transformation，That is, compressing the bet365 voucher。Scholar Gregory Chaitin believes，bet365 voucher is not compressed into theory or a more streamlined narrative，It doesn’t make any sense。This also means，In smart judicial applications，The more situations the case needs to describe，The more lengthy the bet365 voucher is，The degree of compression becomes more powerful。However，Because intelligent technology cannot prove the causal relationship between bet365 voucher，Also causes the risk of distortion even if aware of the possibility，Can’t find the cause of the error、Reality that cannot be corrected。Meanwhile，Our country adheres to the principle of open trials，Public via referee、Judges interpret the law to satisfy the public’s right to know to the greatest extent，Let the judicial system operate stably under the sun。From this，Smart technology may fall into a paradox when applied to judicial decisions: people need to know the details and process of the decision to supervise judicial fairness，The more bet365 voucher information collected at the same time，Intelligent trial tools need to simplify the calculation process so that the public can understand the reasons for the verdict。

To properly handle the relationship between intelligent bet365 voucher operation and law, model construction、Legal interpretation、Inconsistency problems in the four aspects of norm application and judicial ruling，A risk control system can be created，Understand the operational compatibility of the two from an overall perspective，In order to realize the optimization of intelligent bet365 voucher-assisted judicial decision-making。

First，Add a “soft information” filling platform when constructing research models，To resist the rigidity of the “legacy” model of intelligent computing。The prediction function of intelligent technology is a high-level summary of information based on experience，It is easy to fall into the rigid "traditional" tendency in calculations。Where applicable，Note: First, strictly distinguish between groups and individuals、Applicable to both general and individual decisions，Be wary of decision-making application models that apply general generalized bet365 voucher of groups to individuals；The second is to add a "soft information" filling platform during bet365 voucher modeling (Note: Information applicable to individual or a small number of situations is generally called "soft information")，Regularly detect the frequency and influence of new bet365 voucher factors，And after the frequency and influence of the new factor reach a certain threshold，Use it as input bet365 voucher for decision making，Adjust the bet365 voucher model，It can prevent the "legacy" model from becoming rigid to a certain extent。

Secondly，Strengthen the “multi-plan” design during sample collection and statistical analysis，To deal with the misalignment of causal relationships and the generation of closed loops of conclusions。Facing the "non-causal theory" in the operation of intelligent technology，And convergence and rejection、Characteristics of using the old and rejecting the new，Need to change the traditional single-threaded research ideas，Integrate sample collection and statistical analysis in stages，Strengthening the "multi-plan" design: on the one hand，Scientific adjustment of bet365 voucher sampling range，Multiple levels、Think about the causal combination between bet365 voucher and results from multiple perspectives，Aim to identify clear key influencing factors；On the other hand，Be wary of the “over-consistency” trend in statistical analysis，Ensuring diversity in decision-making、Maintain appropriate flexibility and sustainable development of the target system operation，Respect the choices of the majority group and consider the rights and interests of the minority group，Regular feedback on the applicability of statistical results in the context of changing social environments，Adjust the research system and sampling range，To achieve the greatest degree of inclusive benefits。

Finally，Provide "detailed" display in the result interpretation，Using norms to determine the “black box” situation that appears in quantification。Due to the inability of intelligent technology to directly display the calculation process，In specific practice, it is easy to fall into the "one-stop" ruling mode，That is, constructing a ruling model by summarizing the key variables of previous rulings，Enter the corresponding sampling bet365 voucher to draw conclusions directly。To avoid the publicity of this type of adjudication mode、The lack of legal rationality and legality，The adjudication process can be based on pre-trial、Under review、Divide modules after review，The module can be further refined according to the trial details，Including the prosecutor、Defendant、Plaintiff of incidental civil litigation、Court Opinion，And the basis for prosecution、Reasons for defense、Evidence, cross-examination, certification and referee results, etc.，By dividing the overall trial process into several modules vertically or horizontally，Extract key variables from a single module to create sub-modules，Multiple control groups can be established for each module according to participants or trial links，The details of the trial reasoning can be shown to the public to a certain extent，Guarantee the quantification of the ruling to be reasonable and legal，Reflecting judicial authority。

(Author’s Affiliation: Wang Jian bet365 voucher School of Suzhou University)