Bet365 app download Double -blind review, also known as two -way anonymous review，This system has been established in the mainstream journal community in China，and proved to be valid。but，In the field of foreign journals，There is still a large number of single -blind review，There has been controversy in this regard。Recent，Professor of the Department of Insectology at the University of Kentucky at the University of Kentucky、"Charles Fox), editor -in -chief of the" Ecological Insectology "journal, published an article on the official website of the School of Political Economics, UK，Large amount of data indicates，Author's gender、Nationality、Systematic factors such as address and institutional reputation will affect the peer review process of the paper。For this，Many scholars propose to use dual anonymous peer review (double -blind review)，That is, the identity of the reviewer and the author at the same time，to reduce potential prejudice，Improve the fairness of peer review。

Fox Discovery，At present, a single anonymous peer review (single -blind review) is still the most common evaluation method in most disciplines。but，Whether the benefits of people's double -blind review are greater than their costs and their potential limitations are still suspicious。So，Fox and his colleagues conduct related experiments，To understand how anonymous processing authors and institutional information affect the process of peer review。Fox and others collected 3700 papers bet365 Play online games submitted to the British Ecological Society from 2019 to 2022，and randomly assigned to the reviewer，Some manuscripts provide the author's detailed information when allocation，Some manuscripts will not provide any author information。As a result, I found，The author who lives in a richest country can obtain a huge advantage because of the identification of the manuscript，The paper written by the author can also get a higher review score，and more likely to be invited to modify。When the author is anonymous，Their thesis review score is usually low，And it is unlikely to be invited to modify the paper。In the case of double -blind review，The reviewer cannot know the author's identity，So the results from different human development indexes and English levels are similar，to reduce prejudice in the process of peer review。

Fox thinks，If the journal Bet365 app download is anonymous to the author's identity in the process of peer review，Academic publishing will be more fair and fair。Anonymous of the author's identity makes it easier for journals to recruit reviewers，The average use from the author submitted the papers to the editor will be shortened by about 3.5 days。But，As more and more authors upload the paper to the pre -printed server before submitting the journal，The reviewer can be based on the research location、Research object、How to use the method and literature citations and other information comprehensively identify the authors。For this，Fox means，Some of the failure of anonymous failure cannot offset the benefits of improving the objectivity of peer review。Shortly after the results of Fox and others came out，The British Ecological Society transitions all its journals to forced dual -blind review。

Bet365 lotto review Some scholars think，During the judging process of peer，The reviewer and the author should understand each other's identity。Fox thinks，Double -blind review may not necessarily contradict each other with open reviews。Double -blind review allows the author and reviewer to conduct anonymous open interaction (such as collaborative peer review)，There is no prohibiting two parties from publishing and replying to the acceptable papers (such as transparent peer review)。Except the identity of the participants is not disclosed before the end of the review，Double -blind review can even be consistent with the process of open -end review。But，There is no sufficient evidence to indicate，Public reviewer identity can make the reviewer's work attitude more responsible，higher review quality。

　　(Liu Yuwei/Compilation)