Based on comprehensive foreign media reports, the official website of Pennsylvania State University in the United States recently issued an article，Research findings by Dongwon Lee, a professor at the school of information science and technology, and others，Fact checkers generally agree when assessing whether news is bet365 new user promo。

Researchers introduced，About half of U.S. adults regularly get news from bet365 new user promo，But bet365 new user promo platforms generally do not verify the authenticity of news headlines and content like traditional media，May lead to the spread of false information，Cause misleading and harm to individuals and society。Fortunately，bet365 new user promo platforms have begun to address the issue of insufficient censorship，Fact-checkers are increasingly being hired to assess the veracity of messages pushed by platforms，Curb the spread of fake news。

Fact-checking is complex、Multiple levels of process，Many variables involved。Currently，Fact checking is mostly done manually。To get closer to the truth，Fact checkers may choose to verify different events，Or observe different aspects bet365 new user promo same event。If multiple fact-checking agencies continue to agree on the accuracy of a claim，The public is more likely to trust their assessment。Lee Dong-won and others want to know how fact-checkers do their work，And when or why they disagreed。For this，They used a data-driven approach to examine people from the United States、Four online fact-checking platforms in Ireland and Australia (Snopes、PolitiFact、Logically、the Australian Associated Press FactCheck) assessment bet365 new user promo authenticity of news。

Li Dongyuan and others developed an automated method，More than 24,000 articles collected from January 1, 2016 to August 31, 2022 from the above fact-checking platforms，Compare the similarities bet365 new user promo statements in the text。Through this method，They identified 749 possible matching claims between Snopes and PolitiFact (i.e. the same information was being checked)，228 of these claims were given varying authenticity ratings by Snopes and PolitiFact。

Researchers manually analyzed these 228 statements，It is found that part bet365 new user promo rating differences are due to different rating standards。Snopes uses a five-point scale - "true", "mostly true", "somewhat true", "mostly untrue", "untrue"，And additional categories such as "outdated", "picture description does not match the content", "satire", etc.，PolitiFact uses a six-point scale - "true", "mostly true", "half true", "mostly untrue", "untrue" and "a bad lie"。

Other rating differences relate to the timing or specific details of fact checking。After Li Dongyuan and others adjusted these 228 statements，Only one argument remains for the inconsistent authenticity ratings given by Snopes and PolitiFact。"Finally，We only found one case of conflicting ratings，This shows that Snopes and PolitiFact have established a consensus to a large extent、Reliable fact-checking practices。We think this increases the credibility of fact-checkers in the public eye。Finally，Fact-checking helps people understand the truth、Prevent the spread of false information on bet365 new user promo。”Researcher said。

(bet365 new user promo/Compiled)