Factors The judgment of the authenticity of the news
January 19, 2024 10:04 Source: "China Social Sciences" January 19, 2024 Issue 2819 Author: Wang Youran

This newspaper comprehensive foreign media reported that the official website of Pennsylvania Pennsylvania State University recently posted a post,Dongwon Lee, a professor at the School of Information Science and Technology of the School, discovered,Fact Checker (Fact Checker) is assessing whether the news is in real time.。

Researchers introduced,About half of the American adults often obtain news through social media,But social media platforms generally do not verify the authenticity of news title and content like Bet365 app download traditional media,It may cause the dissemination of false information,misleading and injury to individuals and society。Fortunately,The social media platform has begun to solve the problem of insufficient review,More and more of the factual inspector evaluation platform push the message of the information,Containing the spread of fake news。

Fact verification is a complex、Multi -level process,A lot of variables。Current,Factive verification is mostly completed by manual。To get closer to the truth,Factors may choose to verify different events,or observe the different aspects of the same event。If multiple factual verification agencies have continued to be consistent with the evaluation opinions Bet365 lotto review of the accuracy of a certain statement,The public is more likely to believe in their evaluation。Li Dongyuan and others hope to understand the fact that the factors of the investigators will work,and when they or why the opinions are inconsistent。For this,They used data -driven methods to inspect the United States、Four online factual inspection platforms (SNOPES in Ireland and Australia、Politifact、logically、The Australian Associated Press Factcheck) Evaluation of the authenticity of the news。

Li Dongyuan and others have developed an automated method,More than 24,000 articles from the above factual verification platform from January 1, 2016 to August 31, 2022,and compare the similarity in the text。Through this channel,bet365 best casino games They identify 749 possible matching claims between Snopes and Politifact (that is, the same information is checked),Among them, 228 sayings have been given different authentic rating by Snopes and Politifact。

Researchers manually analyzed these 228 statements,It is found that some rating differences are derived from different rating standards。SNOPES uses a five -point table- "real", "general truth", "part of the truth", "general non -true", "not true",and "Oremial", "Irreting and Content", "Steaming" and other additional categories,and Politifact uses a six -point table- "real", "general truth", "half true", "general unknown", "not true", "bad lie"。

Other rating differences are related to the time or specific details of Bet365 app download the factual verification。Li Dongyuan and others adjusted these 228 claims based on this,SNOPES and Politifact's authentic rating is not consistent.。"Last,We only find a case of rating conflict,This shows that SNOPES and Politifact have established consistency to a large extent、Reliable factual verification practice。We believe that this has improved the credibility of the factual inspector in the eyes of the public。Final,Delivery verification helps people understand the truth、Prevention information is spread on social media。"Researchers said。

bet365 live casino games

Editor in charge: Cui Bohan
QR code icons 2.jpg
Key recommendation
The latest article
Graphics
bet365 live casino games

Friendship link:

Website filing number: Jinggong.com Anxie 11010502030146 Ministry of Industry and Information Technology:

All rights reserved by China Social Sciences Bet365 app download Magazine shall not be reprinted and used without permission

General Editor Email: zzszbj@126.com This website Contact information: 010-85886809 Address: 11-12, Building 1, Building 1, No. 15, Guanghua Road, Chaoyang District, Beijing: 100026