Use a large language model to study ethical problems
February 21, 2024, 10:08 Source: "China Social Sciences", February 21, 2024, Issue 2836 Author: Our reporter Wang Junmei

For centuries,philosophers and ethicists have been trying to describe、The concept of definition and classification of morality,or answering what is "good" and "doing good deeds"。In recent years,Join of emerging disciplines and academic perspectives due to psychology,Make the academic community discuss the situation of moral issues prosperous。Like the fierce debate caused by moral issues,The definition of the concept of "Common Good" will also change according to different needs and different values。But if you put specific moral problems aside,Instead of paying attention to the wider aspect of "common good" as a concept,It is likely to find some of the common principles of them。Recent,Australian Royal Melbourne University of Technology Melissa Wheeler, senior lecturer at the School of Commerce and Law of the School of Business and Law,、Associate Professor of the Department of Management and Marketing of the University of Science and Technology of Australia, Samuel Wilson, and others published an article in the British Journal of Social Psychology (British Journal of Social Psychology ".,A valid definition is conducive to the gathering of academic circles and wider interests.,Take action for "common good",to better cope with the common challenges facing humans。

 bet365 best casino games

The three major schools of western normative ethics show different perspectives,Alishdo's virtue,Obligation and absolute commands to Kant,Then to Bianqin's happiness maximizing and pain minimum utilitarian ethics,Every ideological genre is very different Bet365 lotto review from other schools。Due to moral theory, so much,and often form a conflict,So,It is a challenge that continues to this day for the composition of moral theory,Not to mention the composition of a good and fair society and how to achieve it,What is "common good"。The article reviews the historical concept of "common good",Modified the theory of competing with each other。

"Common Goodness" as a normative concept has a long history,Its meaning is full of differences。Plato imagined an ideal country,In this country,For a "common good" for a harmonious society,Private property and family will be abandoned。and Aristotle define "common good" based on the happiness shared by the public,The key element is wisdom and virtue。With the rise of social contract theory in the 17th century,The concept of "common good" has received more lasting attention,Some scholars at that time thought,People should give up absolute freedom in exchange for the interests and safety of community life。About this period,The concept of "common good" has changed from the attention of moral virtue and the ideal vision of the beautiful society to the attention of personal material well -being。Subsequent,18th and 19th century thinkers,If the utilitarian Bian Qin and Mueller thinks,The correct action is to create the biggest "utility" for society。As the modern society turns to pay attention to material welfare and benefits most members of society,20th Century,Scholars witnessed the road、Schools and other public products and clean air、The increasing attention of public resources such as clean water。21st Century,Scholars like Jamesky and others mentioned the concept of "common good" in various affirmative and critical ways。

Including the government、Policy maker、Various stakeholders including enterprises and scholars,There is bet365 Play online games a sense of moral obligation,Decisions to promote "common good"。Recent,The field of academic research is increasingly valued "common good","Responsible research and innovation" and "public interest technology" and other concepts The emergence of the concepts such as。But,In view of politics、Facing climate change in the economic and social field、Health Crisis、Technical threats and other increasingly complicated issues,Realizing "common good" is becoming more and more challenging,The increasing political division and conflict have further exacerbated these challenges。

  Use large language model analysis and refinement

In Social Science,Social psychology is particularly suitable for studying the hidden attitude of the common social、Belief and Lenovo。For example,Recently, there is a study using semantic analysis to detect social and cultural prejudice in daily language used on social media platforms。So,Social psychology provides a fruitful method to discover and describe the concept of "common good"。The similarity of thinking about virtue or what is "good" is based on people,The potential part of "common good" may be shared between people。Folk theory in social psychology is a secular belief,Represents an individual's informal and subjective understanding of the surrounding world。Moral concept,such as "Common Good",penetrated into people's understanding and perception of the world,and in the process of communication with others。I have discovered it in studies,The occurrence of moral experience is frequent,If moral incidents are so prominent in daily life,So the moral topic including "common good",It may be discussed、Description and discussion。

Traditionally,Researchers relied on qualitative research to build a folk theory。But,Advances in the recent psychological bet365 best casino games research method have led to the popularization of high -efficiency computing technologies such as large -scale language data analysis。3878_3914,The trend used to analyze the large text corpus。liwc can efficiently and reliable analysis of a large amount of text data,Cultural mode that can make social psychology researchers check the thinking and communication in the language,To identify and understand the concepts such as "common good"。Social psychologists give their own definitions by asking people to give some elusive concepts,You can sort out vocabulary with higher frequency,and get a common cultural understanding from the collection of text。

Huiller and others through the folk theory method of social psychology,Collected more than 10,000 people in Australia's definition information for "common good",and analyze the above information through language analysis tools,I have drawn 9 main aspects of the definition of "common good": the result of the maximum interests of most people; it is conducive to the decision -making and actions of most people; Interests; serving most people rather than a few people's interests; serving group interests rather than personal interests; serving the interests of citizens; care and doing correct things for everyone; realizing the moral principles required for common interests。There is no big difference between these aspects in different political tendencies,This means that people have consensus on the concept of "common good"。

These 9 themes reflect the deeper concept structure,Can be refined into three core aspects of "common good",Results and results、Principles related to stakeholders。The first category describes the goals and results related to "common good",For example,Decisions and actions that are considered to meet the best interests in most people。The second bet365 Play online games category refers to the principles related to "common good" and the process and practice of realizing "common good"。The third category involves the interests of the community that constitutes the community or has the right to enjoy the "common good" and their interests。Therefore, Wilson and others summarized a definition of "common good": "common good" is committed to achieving the best results for most people,Its foundation is a sound decision -making in ethics and morals,and depending on the background of decision -making。Fundamental speaking,"Common Goodness" refers to the "product" that serves all members of the specific community,It also refers to the ethical process and practice related to the environment when realizing "common good"。Due to the definition of context dependence,Therefore, further research needs to discuss the meaning of "common good" and how to in different backgrounds (such as cross -cultural comparison fields)、Different stakeholders and "moral groups" (such as people holding different morals and philosophy views) occurred.Text analysis software such as 3878_3914。

  Future research needs to expand the data range

Current,There are many references about "common good" and their synonyms,The meaning of these moral concepts is considered to be obvious or self -evident。Huiller and others think,This assumption is inconsistent with the dispute between the definition of these concepts。With a clearer definition,Those who are related to interest can better understand how people think of "common good",to make a more wise decision,Services for common interests,and formulate strategies to strive for public support for decision -making。So,Reaching the common concept of "common good" is very important,The society that helps the split society is together bet365 Play online games to deal with various threats。

Huileler and others said,Although the common understanding of "common good" is determined,But still need to be recognized,People are sharing some concepts,There are still differences in the practical methods of social and moral issues that are prioritized and considers to realize "common good"。For example,Recent research indicates,People are very concerned about fair questions,But how to view the question of fairness。Some people start from the perspective of social order,Follow the process or how to achieve fairness and justice; some people are more concerned about generating fair results。Both sides are concerned about inequality issues,But in discussing or solving the problem of social inequality,The views of both parties are often inconsistent。If both parties are willing to start from looking for in common,Then discuss the fields of differences with an open attitude,Learn each other's advantages,It is more helpful to decompose and deal with difficult problems。

Huiller and others summarized the shortcomings of this research。Although this study provides new opinions on the concept structure of "common good",But it did not provide information beyond the information revealed by the text surface。No interview with the participants during the investigation,To understand the social and cultural background and how personal life experience affects its views on "common good",I didn’t try to further analyze the text,To explain the meaning or background behind the participants,Therefore, it has to be conducted in more in -depth qualitative research。other,This research is performed in a specific historical and cultural context,The survey sample is Australians from 2018-2021,This means that the concept structure revealed in the analysis bet365 live casino games has certain limitations。Future research can be based on this research,Expand the scope of data collection to different geographical、Society、Culture and economic background,To understand how different backgrounds affect people's meaning and structure of "common good"。

Editor in charge: Zhang Jing
QR code icons 2.jpg
Key recommendation
The latest article
Graphics
bet365 live casino games

Friendship link:

Website filing number: Jinggong.com Anmi 11010502030146 Ministry of Industry and Information Technology:

All rights reserved by China Social Sciences Magazine shall not be reprinted and used without permission

General Editor Email: zzszbj@126.com This website contact information: 010-85886809 Address: Building 11-12, Building 1, Building 1, No. 15, Guanghua Road, Chaoyang District, Beijing: 100026