This newspaper comprehensive foreign media reported that the official website of the University of Amsterdam, the University of Amsterdam in the Netherlands, recently reported a report，Three researchers from the school's Department of Social Psychology found the level of trust in 2,780 interviewees to trust in 45 fields.，For scientists in different fields，There is a big difference in people in terms of trust。

Scientists stand on the front line of responding to significant global challenges，Facing epidemic disease、Climate change、Social inequality、Urgent environment and social problems such as biodiversity loss，It can provide valuable insights and possible solutions，Many people also have expectations bet365 best casino games for their positive acts。The key to let these ideas play a practical role，It is the public trust and is willing to give scientists to influence in policy formulation。Given that the trust of scientists is to adopt a positive attitude and abide by scientific suggestions (such as vaccination、Make a pro -environmental behavior) key，Exploring how the trust of scientists is established and enhanced, it is important。Differences of the level of trust，People can better use scientific power to cope with the challenges facing human society。

But，Research on the determination of trust and determination in the past is limited，and did not take into account the diversity of scientific occupations，Makes the academic community know very little about "what people trust people's trust in different disciplines and perspectives"。Current，The understanding of this problem is affected by the hidden assumption of "all scientific occupations bet365 best casino games is homogeneous"，And this further hinders the success of the "scientific -based solution"。Science is not a single career: it consists of many disciplines，Each discipline is in the goal、Value and research methods are different。Previous research found，The word "scientist" is an over -sum -general。So far，How this diversity is transformed into a "different treatment" of trust in scientists still needs to be explored。This is because most related studies are concentrated in the common term "scientist"，Some exceptions are solo research for a certain or two specific groups or categories。From the perspective of researchers，The lack of systematic comparative research on the trust of different types of scientists is a problem.，Because the intervention measures that are not clearly committed to strengthening trust should be targeted at a specific or general scientist。

To make up for this gap，Researchers conducted Bet365 app download research on 2780 respondents，Explore the formation of the trust of 45 scientists in different fields。The respondent was asked about the ability to scientists、courage、moral、Enthusiasm's views on the four social evaluation dimensions。other，This research also incorporated into a new "influence given task"，Invite the interviewees to allocate decision -making rights to different groups for a certain issue，One of them is always a scientist in a certain field，It is used to explore how to in turn to shape the willingness of people to give scientists on the influence of scientists in responding to the influence of complex social issues。

Research results show，Overall，People tend to trust scientists，This manifestation is that the scores in different scientific fields are above the middle point。But，Trust level is very different due to the differences in the fields of scientists。such as，In a 7 -point scale，7 points represent bet365 best casino games the most trust，1 point represents the least trustworthy，Politicians and economists scored 3.71 points and 4.28 points respectively，and the level of trust in neurologists and marine biologists is higher，5.53 points and 5.54 points, respectively。Researchers also found，Ability and morality are the two main driving factor of trust。When people think that scientists have the ability and morality，It is more likely to trust them，and willing to make them qualified to solve social problems。The interesting thing is，Although the influence of ability is consistent，But the impact of morality on trust is inconsistent in different scientific fields，Disputes、Fields involving public debate topics，The correlation with the morality of scientists and trust is stronger。

Researchers said，This research is just the beginning，Future research should focus on exploring the universality of these discoveries，and in -depth bet365 best casino games study of causality between trust and other variables。but but，One thing is very clear: people need to consider the diversity of science，in order to better understand the problem of trust，This is very important for understanding how to find the best way to find a scientific solution to the policy。

(Fangshi/Compilation)