Algorithm may help solve systemic prejudice problems
June 19, 2024 at 15:39 Source: "China Social Sciences" June 19, 2024 Issue 2915 Author: Zhao Qian

This newspaper comprehensive foreign media report recently,ASHESH Rambachan, an expert at the Department of Economics, Harvard University of Arts and Sciences, Harvard University, published the latest research in the Economics Season Journal,Use algorithms to replace certain judicial decision -making functions to eliminate systemic prejudices that the judge may exist in the case,to promote justice。

Article pointed out,Current,In many cases,Decision Bet365 lotto review makers need to make important choices based on the prediction of unknown results。Especially judges,They want to determine whether the defendant can get bail,or how to judge the convicted person。Some companies have used machine learning -based models in high -risk decisions。When deploying these learning models,There are various assumptions for human behavior。There have been other studies have conducted statistical inspection of these assumptions,That is, whether the decision maker will make systematic prediction errors,and developed a method to evaluate whether their predictions have systematic deviations。

Langbakan was inspired by the above -mentioned bet365 Play online games research to start an in -depth analysis of the pre -trial system in New York City, USA。He found,Due to the defendant's race、Disclosure of the characteristics of age and previous behavior,A considerable number of judges have errors in systemic predictions of the defendant's improper behavior risk before trial。

Langbakan uses the public information of New York City Judges in the study,These judges are randomly assigned to the case of the designated court's case.,Analyze the defendant's release decision without appearing in court。There are 1460462 cases involved,Among them, the defendant of 758027 cases was released Bet365 app download in advance。Langbakan see,In the case where the characteristics of the defendant are given,At least 20%of the judges have an error in the systemic prediction of the defendant's improper behavior risk。At least 32%of the judges' judgment is inconsistent with the actual ability to deliver the designated bail with the defendant。

Langbakan said,Although the impact of replacing the judges' decision -making with algorithm decision -making rules has not been accurately evaluated,But it can indeed improve the efficiency of trial,The probability of systematic prejudice will also be significantly reduced。Whether the algorithm is completely used in bet365 Play online games the future to replace human decision makers,Depending on whether humans will observe the systemic prediction errors that they commit in accordance with the algorithm,and whether the algorithm has an in -depth understanding of human behavior。(Zhao Qian/Compilation)

Editor in charge: Cui Bohan
QR code icons 2.jpg
Key recommendation
The latest article
Graphics
bet365 live casino games
Video

Friendship link:

Website filing number: Jinggong.com Anxie 11010502030146 Ministry of Industry and Information Technology:

All rights reserved by China Social Sciences Magazine shall not be reprinted and used without permission

Bet365 app download General Editor Email: zzszbj@126.com This website contact information: 010-85886809 Address: 11-12, Building 1, Building 1, No. 15, Guanghua Road, Chaoyang District, Beijing: 100026