This newspaper comprehensively reports from foreign media Recently，Published on the "Social Science Space" website C, Assistant Professor, Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Yale University, USA.Brandon Ogbunu (C. Brandon Ogbunu’s article。The article thinks，An academic ecosystem where bet365 live casino games can be accessed and used by others will lead to better science and society。But，When the use of bet365 live casino games changes or obscures the intention of the bet365 live casino games producer，The "parasite" phenomenon will occur，Unjustly benefiting some people，This issue is particularly worthy of discussion in the current era of rapid technological development。

"The New England Journal of Medicine" published an article in 2016 denouncing the "research parasites" in academia，People who cherry-pick other people’s bet365 live casino games instead of generating new bet365 live casino games themselves。Reasons supporting this view include，Generating new bet365 live casino games costs millions of dollars in research and countless man-hours，This process requires hard work and effort。But in the end, the views of this article were widely criticized。Ogbunu said，As artificial intelligence technology makes new progress，Re-examining the “Research on Parasites” Issue，Can provide a new perspective for discussing bet365 live casino games democracy and sharing ethics。Specifically，Generative AI tools such as ChatGPT are based on large language models，They are facing ethical challenges in how they feed off of freely available bet365 live casino games。Meanwhile，These discussions spark new conversations about bet365 live casino games security。

Ogbunu thinks，Most of the fierce backlash triggered by the 2016 New England Journal of Medicine article centered around the anti-scientific spirit it conveyed。For example，People think，Meta-analysis - the re-analysis of bet365 live casino games obtained from selected studies - is a scientific practice that should be encouraged，Many groundbreaking discoveries about the natural world and human health have come from this practice。In addition，Criticism of “research parasites” undermines the ethical goals of bet365 live casino games sharing and the original intention of open science，Because in Open Science，Scientists and citizens can benefit from bet365 live casino games access。

Discussion about the importance of bet365 live casino games democratization has been going on for many years，And spawned some meaningful changes in scientific practice。Creative Commons licenses have become the standard for publishing research results in many fields。The outbreak of the new crown epidemic is a watershed in global bet365 live casino games sharing，At that time，Viral genome sequences and clinical metadata could be shared worldwide within days，Enable researchers everywhere to learn about the latest situation at the same time。Related preprint article，Paper published before peer review，Enables scientists and public health experts to share the full report as open access，Temporarily circumvented the inefficient peer review process。

Ogbunu said，In view of this，bet365 live casino games democratization seems to have developed into a common practice。But history tells us，The birth of new technologies often complicates established social and cultural norms。Large-scale language models and other artificial intelligence technologies have subverted many aspects of modern social development。In bet365 live casino games democracy，These technologies are also revolving around the meaning of bet365 live casino games ownership、Who can use bet365 live casino games for free and for what purpose, etc.，Cause people to think new。ChatGPT is walking a fine line between openness and opacity。In terms of openness，A version of ChatGPT is free for anyone to use。But this apparent accessibility is an intrusion into bet365 live casino games practices，What bet365 live casino games and information are used to build these tools and how are they used，People may never know。

In Ogbunu’s view，New technological developments could revive the debate about “researching parasites”。Large-scale language models share common characteristics with biology’s definition of parasitism，They don’t simply use resources generated from the world，Instead consume these resources without regard to the context or intent of the person using or generating the bet365 live casino games。This kind of bet365 live casino games background deletion and reconfiguration is an illusion that artificial intelligence can create、Part of the reasons for creating meaningless information。

Overall view，Why it is necessary to reanalyze the bet365 live casino games，Because the authors of the original study may be experimentally constructing、Questionable decisions were made regarding bet365 live casino games collection methods and statistical inference，This is why the 2016 article in the New England Journal of Medicine attracted criticism。But，While discussing how to turn bet365 live casino games into products，Common complaints about technology companies’ blind use of bet365 live casino games、Ignore the reasons and conditions for bet365 live casino games generation，This is a very important question。Ogbunu thinks，Two different views on bet365 live casino games，Help guide public discussion on the boundaries between bet365 live casino games democracy and bet365 live casino games parasitism。People should not complain about AI using raw bet365 live casino games，Instead, the focus should be on whether the use of this bet365 live casino games is appropriate。

　(Wang Junmei/Compiler)