2022，Comparison of international forces and the continuous development of the global pattern，The world enters a new turbulent change period。In this context，China International Relations Stadium Seeking Stable Change，Keep exploring the breakthrough point and growth point of theory from China's own development。

　　bet365 Play online games

2022，The research on the related research of Xi Jinping's diplomatic thoughts and diplomacy with Chinese characteristics continues，Enter theoreticalization、Systematic、Diversified perspective explains its foundation foundation and knowledge system。

The theoretical exploration of Xi Jinping ’s diplomatic thoughts appears

As an important part of Xi Jinping's new era of socialist thought with Chinese characteristics，Xi Jinping's diplomatic thought provides a fundamental follow -up and action guide for foreign work in my country。Since its guidance status was established，The value of the era of Xi Jinping's diplomatic thought、Practical significance、Scientific connotation、Topics of target pointing to start demonstration。2022，Except for continuing the above research path，The theoretical exploration of Xi Jinping's diplomatic thought is further strengthened。

Wu Xinbo uses a comparative perspective，From value theory、Human nature theory、Three aspects of ontology discussed the fundamental difference between Xi Jinping's diplomatic thought and Western diplomatic thoughts。Facing the reconstruction of the future world，Xi Jinping's diplomatic thoughts are re -defined with the logic of Chinese logic，Use the perspective that is different from the West and has a high degree of complementation with the West to make up and improve the innate deficiency and deviation of the world in the West's single perspective，To achieve the true sense of universality and the universality of humans。Mao Wei Zhun proposed，Xi Jinping ’s diplomatic idea shows the practical basis in inheriting Marxist theory、materialism cornerstone、Dialectic thinking and human focus，Fully showed the Marxist positions that the Communists of the Communist Party of China showed in responding to the opportunities and challenges brought by the unreasonable changes in the century、perspective and method，This is also the most obvious feature of Xi Jinping ’s diplomatic ideology。Guo Shuyong、Zhang Xiaoyin's perspective based on the history of international relations，Systematically summarized the impact of Xi Jinping's diplomatic thought on the development of the Chinese school，I believe that Xi Jinping's diplomatic thought to solve the dual opposition and cultural hegemony logic behind the simple power and politics，It has promoted the research of cultural cooperation and civilized relations of international relations; the core theory such as the methodology of practicing the methodology of materialism，Western center theory that broke the theory of international relations，Leading the development of international relations with non -Western wisdom and solution。

other，Some scholars have begun to analyze and look forward to analyzing Xi Jinping's research on diplomatic ideology itself，I look forward to the research content、Research ideas and research paradigms provide valuable reference to the academic community。Wei Ling、Niu Ziqian proposed，Strengthen the construction of China's foreign academic discourse system，Enhance "Problem Consciousness"，Pay attention to history and reality、Literature research and empirical research、The combination of research on international politics and Sinicization of Marxistism，It should become the effort direction of continuing to deepen Xi Jinping's research on diplomatic ideology。Jiang Tianzheng through the measurement analysis of the literature，Think on the existing basis，Related research can strengthen equilibrium、Publicity、Innovation and other angles to expand。

Foreign Study of Diplomacy, a major country with Chinese characteristics

Under the guidance of the Central Committee of the Party Central Committee and the guidance of Xi Jinping's diplomatic ideas，Diplomacy of great powers with Chinese characteristics has achieved pioneering、Historical achievements。On the basis of continuing to dig deeper into the path of diplomatic practice with a large country with Chinese characteristics，The academic community has begun to expand systemic exploration of the entire process of diplomacy with great powers with Chinese characteristics，Try to at the basic concept、Analysis framework and other aspects Find the knowledge innovation direction of diplomatic capacity building。

Understanding of the concept and connotation of "diplomatic ability"，Ling Shengli proposed that diplomatic capabilities should be understood as the ability to effectively formulate and implement foreign policies for sovereign countries，That is, the ability to "big diplomacy"。Specifically includes the innovation ability of diplomatic theory、Diplomatic planning ability、Foreign Mechanism Construction Capability、Five aspects of diplomatic coordination ability and diplomatic execution ability。Luo Jianbo thinks，diplomatic ability is the country's comprehensive use of Bet365 app download various diplomatic resources and diplomatic methods to safeguard the national interests and properly handle the ability of the relationship with the external world。It is based on national strength，Taking diplomatic resources as the condition，Guarantee of diplomatic means and method as a guarantee，Diplomatic art as a characteristic，Including coordination and coordination ability、Theoretical innovation ability、Strategic planning ability、Four core capabilities of strategic implementation capabilities。Bai Yunzhen、Zhang Qi proposed，From the perspective of conceptual and practical theory, from the perspective of unity of theory of practice，National diplomatic ability is cognitive ability、Decision ability、Governance ability、fiscal ability、Organic unity of five dimensions of discourse ability，Reflected ideas in diplomatic dimensions、Method、Practice、Methods and the unified view of the knowledge and action of the statement，It needs to be understood from the perspective of subjective and objective unification in diplomatic incidents and historical contexts to understand。

In addition to the analysis of basic concepts，Wang Fan proposed under the framework of multi -target decision -making，Strategic sorting of Chinese diplomacy。Based on multi -target decision -making theory，He thinks based on importance、urgency、Feasibility and reasonable judgment，Strategic sorting of Chinese diplomacy requires clear strategic goals，and make the sub -target serving the total target instead of deviating from the total target。When coordinating the issue of national interests，To distinguish the priority and jurisdiction，Relationship between the importance and urgency of the importance and urgency，Highlights、Take into account balance、Bring it with a point。Wen Yao by clarifying the different paths of national diplomatic capacity innovation，Put the Communist Party of China to the innovative field of diplomatic capabilities of the Communist Party of China，Analysis of the process and effect of the Chinese Communist Party's external exchanges to exert the mobility，Then the development process framework for the innovation of another formal diplomatic capacity was extracted，In the conversion stage，The state mobilizes existing resources，Convert it to stable、resources that can be used for diplomatic purposes; in the specialized stage，The country's diplomatic tool attribute to strengthen this diplomatic resources，Develop it into conventional diplomatic tools。

Expansion of the Diversified Research Ob direction

Development of diplomatic practice often involves economy、Law、Cultural and other fields common participation。With the comprehensive advancement of Xi Jinping's diplomatic thoughts and diplomatic research with Chinese characteristics，Related interdisciplinary research is constantly emerging，Construction of Xi Jinping's diplomatic ideological and theoretical system from a more diverse perspective。

Many scholars pay attention to the theory of international communication of Xi Jinping from the perspective of external communication、Method and focus。Liu Hongsong thinks，The international communication of Xi Jinping's diplomatic thought is mainly three key tasks。First, the combination of theoretical communication and practice communication，Second, the combination of media communication and academic communication，Third, the combination of discourse practice and exchange practice。For the first two tasks，China needs to use solid academic research results and the content of practical results to respond to the outside world's question of the concept of the community of human destiny。

Deng Lie、Zhang Lingyu pays attention to the relationship between Xi Jinping's diplomatic thought and international law。They propose，Facing two domestic and international situation，Based on safety、Stable、Global Vision of Development，Bobba with "the world as the public"，Deeply practicing non -interference、Ask for win -win、Basic concept of public welfare，Work hard to build equality、Multi -pole、The multilateral co -governance international pattern of rule of law，It is the era mission and strategic issue that Xi Jinping's diplomatic thoughts given to international law theory innovation。Zhao Bin、Xie Shumin sorted out the diplomatic thoughts of Xi Jinping under the overseas Chinese academic vision and discovered，Related researchers no matter where you are，The foundation foundation first reflects the position orientation of the Western Free Democracy System。Most of them are more objective and neutral，But there are no shortage of solution or even wrong cognition。Overall，Overseas Chinese Studies，Building a community of human destiny is conducive to resisting economic and ecological crises，can also be effective in dealing with hegemony、Power politics and terrorism challenges。About the view of new global governance，Overseas Chinese studies present two stances and attitudes。This aspect comes from their lack of correct understanding of Chinese traditional culture and value concepts，Leading the awareness of the new global governance concept; on the other hand, it originated from the ideology of various countries、Differences on social systems and interests，Leading to look at the problem with zero sum of game thinking。

　　Under the change of a hundred years of changeInternational Situation Research

The epidemic in the global new crown pneumonia has not ended、Ukraine crisis in the context of followed，The international situation full of uncertainty is more complicated and changing。Based on this，China International Relations Scholars adapt to general changes，Continue to expand research paths and vision at the relevant theory and practical level。

The research on international order is continuously deepened

For international order、System、The analysis of changes in pattern is still the focus of the theoretical research of international relations。Yang Jiemian pointed out，The current international system is in the transition period of alternating and qualitative changes，More and more non -Western countries are criticizing outdated international relations theory，In the next 30 years, the world will open a new period with relatively balanced balance of East and West and the basically stable world's polarization。Ni Feng and other scholars also summarize the impact of Russia's conflict on the international political pattern，I believe that the pace of adjustment of the relationship between the great power is accelerated，Enhance the military reserve or strengthen the alliance to become an important choice for a big country，The trend of multi -poleization in the world will accelerate。

For the existing international order and build a new international order problem，Cai Tuo pointed out，The "Liberal International Order", which is highly respected in the West because of interference orientation、Level thinking not only brings a destructive effect on the international community，and cause it to fall into a crisis。Current，It needs to be guided by worldism，See humans as an interdependent overall，Perform equal dialogue、Consultation and cooperation is the key to get rid of many difficulties。The power for international order transformation、Process and direction，Scholars have also carried out useful exploration。Wei Bing thinks，Current，China has realized the improvement of material interests and rules through reforms through reforms and creation of new tolerance.，The continuous interaction between China and the United States in the field of international systems will determine the process of future international order transformation。Scholars also have more deeper analysis of the role concepts of China in the process of international order transformation。Wang Shikai's proposal，China has developed into a new center country in the continuous revival and strong rise，New Center Country is a new country type produced in the modern world system，It has changed the international structure defined by the national strength，It is the fundamental force to promote the transformation of world order and ensure the development of the world order.。

Facing the uncertainty of the relationship between the great power，The incremental mechanism of the field through the field，The incremental mechanism of the field through the field，That is, the Great Congress will be geographical、Technology and international systems as the preferred field for the initial advantages，Then seek long -term advantages。Qi Haixia pointed out，International relations caused by power transfer、Low political issues are upgraded to high political levels will promote high political issues to become the focus of future international relations research。Zhang Yuyan emphasized when summarizing the game of the post -epidemic era，One of the many characteristics of today's globalization manifests as the return of ideology。The game between the big country or the national group shifted from simple "interest politics" to "interest politics+principles politics"，This will increase the difficulty of reaching global consensus。For the relationship between the future of the future，Scholars have also thought in depth。Xia Liping pointed out，After the Cold War, Sino -US Russian three -sided relationship has changed significantly，Russia and Ukraine Conflict will be in geopolitics and security、International order、Three dimensions including the economy and high technology further have an impact on Sino -US -Russian relations that cannot be ignored。

Technical change has become an important perspective of international relations

The academic community to big data、The attention of artificial intelligence and emerging technology fields continues to rise。Feng Shuai pointed out，The research of artificial intelligence international relations mainly focuses on the impact of changes in artificial intelligence technology on the interactive process of international systems and international behaviors。Affected by the cyclical characteristics of technological development and research itself foaming tendencies，China's artificial intelligence international relations research is facing huge pressure on long -term stable development。Only establish an effective link with the subject matrix of international issues research，Reasonable planning for research issues，Actively build an academic community of artificial intelligence international relations，can effectively respond to future risks and challenges。Zhang Tao、Yu Li proposed，Once the algorithm is used by national behavior，It has become an international political tool for the country to pursue power and interests in international anarchy，It also has a "non -neutral" effect。

About the competition and national security bet365 live casino games in the digital era，Scholars have also made useful thinking。Ye Chengcheng thinks，Data、Hardware and algorithms have become the core production materials in the digital age，It constitutes the digital resources of the country。Digital resources brought about changes in production methods，Starting structural power began to impact and innovate the past。Although the digital technology revolution has exacerbated Sino -US science and technology competition in the short term，But in the long run, it will still strengthen the mutual dependence between China and the United States。Liu Guozhu emphasized，"Digital authoritarianism" theory is the reflection of the United States' "strategic failure to China" in the digital field in recent years，China should be in the international community，Especially in the United Nations framework proposed and advocating the common outlook on the digital era，and from the perspective of global governance，Actively propose a Chinese plan for digital governance，Cracking "digital authoritarianism" theory brings to China。Cracking "digital authoritarianism" theory brings to China，Sun Xuefeng pointed out，In the context of digital technology competition，East Asia's security order is facing a new impact，But the policy choices of most East Asian countries in China and most East Asian countries have not separated from existing security strategic models，East Asia's security order shows strong toughness and continuity。

Global governance research focuses on the exploration of new paths

The profound changes in the international political and economic pattern have promoted the reflection and reconstruction of the academic circles for the global governance field。Guo Shuyong、Shu Weichao proposed，The current global governance system is the product of hegemony politics，Participants and problems areas are affected by hegemony politics，​​So，Global governance of Western countries is not as good as Western governance global。Wang Yaqi introduced after the empirical research perspective，Explained the mechanism of rational behavior in a fragmented mechanism complex towards "organized irresponsible"，Causes the fragmentation of mechanism to produce negative effects in global governance。Xu Xiujun thinks，New Crown Pneumonia Epidemic Outlook Refusaling Global Governance Path provides historical opportunities，From value、mode、System、Council to discuss the path of the development of the global governance system for several aspects。

The results of digital governance research can also be remarkable。Xue Xiaoyuan's proposed，If you want to stand at the forefront of digital globalization，Copy the global digital governance strategy and policy，It is necessary to establish the problem of the problem of global digital governance research，Including global consciousness、Time consciousness、Overall consciousness、Innovation consciousness and forward -looking consciousness。Liu Haiying thinks，The diversified challenges facing global digital governance are mainly reflected in the continuous expansion of digital gaps in developed countries and developing countries，Ahead of the country's regulations and standards in the digital field intensify，Digital hegemonicism and deepen the social impact of destructive technology。Zhang Moan emphasized，Data、Computing power、Algorithms are redefining the key productive forces of the digital age。Digital Technology、Digital rules、Digital sovereignty is becoming a new focus of the game of a great country，Global digital governance has become the "new track" of the game of great powers。

other，Scholars have also explored the new path of global governance from a wider perspective。Lu Jing's proposed，China should focus on improving the knowledge discourse system of building a community of marine destiny，Multilateralism of the Community of Marine Destiny Community，Create a diverse collaborative governance pattern。Dong Yanzhuang thinks，The governance of digital currency needs to balance innovation and risk，Highly interaction of realizing technological innovation and effective governance。Xu Xiujun、Lin Kaiwen has deeply thought about the operation and development of the international trade governance mechanism from the perspective of an intensified politicalization trend of the international economic agenda。Ren Lin pointed out，Systemic crisis brought by the wave of compoundism，Actively participate in changes in the global governance system，Shape an tolerance rather than lining him、Diverse rather than split global governance order，It is a major proposition that is urgent and arduous in China and the international community at the moment。

Promotion of the Construction of Disciplinary Autonomous Knowledge System

2022，A number of research results of the future and development of international relations in international relations in international relations，Showing the regional country、Promotion of national security、A good momentum of moving forward，and finally promote the construction of China's international relations knowledge system。

Regional countries do not be promoted to first -level disciplines

September 13, 2022，Regional Guoxue officially becomes an independent first -level discipline under the cross -disciplinary category。Some scholars analyzed from the perspective of the constituent knowledge system of regional countries.，Qin Yaqing pointed out，Bet365 lotto review The knowledge system of the country's country should contain three types of knowledge，descriptive knowledge、Learn knowledge and application knowledge。These three types of knowledge have their own characteristics and focus，There is also an inseparable connection。From the current perspective of Chinese regional countries,，The production and reproduction of these three kinds of knowledge can better play the advantages of different disciplines，It also complements each other、The practical significance of promoting discipline development together。There are also scholars to analyze the independent knowledge system from the perspective of the disciplinary identity construction perspective of problem orientation and regional national learning。Wang Zhanpeng thinks，Unified exploration of unity and particularity of universality and particularity will be an important path for the development of the status of the country's national discipline，In Marxist dialectical materialism and historical materialism、Under the guidance of human destiny community，The disciplinary construction and independent knowledge system innovation of Guoxue in China will be the cause and effect，Common Development。Zhu Fengjin said，Under the guidance of the concept of the community of human destiny，Research on regional countries in China and regional countries in European and American countries in the traditional sense separate.，It can form a regional national disciplinary system that can be formed in China，It is necessary to build suggestions for the major reality of the country。

In the context of how to study more prosperous regional countries，Effectively promote the construction of regional countries，It is a question that the academic community needs positive response at present。Zhou Fangyin pointed out，Regional countries need to form a basic theory group as soon as possible、Main research paradigm and related middle -level theory，Enhance the sense of belonging of researchers。Through the discipline construction of regional countries，Promote Chinese regional countries to study knowledge exploration、Social Service、progress in talent training。One of the requirements for discipline construction is textbooks。So far，Regardless of domestic or foreign，Textbooks used in regional national learning teaching can be described as few。Jiang Shixue Suggestion，The Ministry of Education should do a good job of top -level design，Organize several regional countries to learn textbook writing group，Put a one or several high -quality textbooks as soon as possible。Academic Conference is also the key to discipline construction，October 23, 2022，The establishment of the "China Regional National Studies Community" was held at Beijing University of Foreign Languages ​​University.。December of the same year，The first "China Regional National Learning 50 People Forum" was successfully held in the cloud。

Progress of National Security Construction

2022，State -level discipline of national security advances solidly advance，The connotation and extension of national security are continuously expanded，Especially Chinese national security construction has made new progress。Xiao Yan pointed out，We must use the overall national security concept as the guiding ideology of discipline construction，Exploring path with cross -integration as a disciplinary paradigm，With national security thought and theory、National Security Strategy、National Security Governance、National Security Technology is the discipline theoretical system and talent training direction，Use system thinking、Strategic thinking and innovative thinking builds the independent knowledge system of Chinese national security disciplines。National Security Studies is a new first -level discipline，Have natural discipline advantages。Dong Chunling pointed out，National Security Studies in academic propositions、Academic Thought、Academic Perspective、Academic Standards、There is huge independent innovation space in academic discourse，Unique knowledge system in the field of national security、Theoretical system、Methodism has enough development momentum，Great change to give birth to big thoughts，New Era Call for New Theory，With the continuous advancement of China's maintenance and shaping the great practice of national security in the new era，The construction of national security of Chinese characteristics is at all times、Broad prospects。

Current，There are still some controversial points in the development direction of national security disciplines。For this，Tang Shiqi、Yu Tiejun、Qi Haotian proposed the composite development direction of my country's national security discipline，National Security Studies, although the discipline settings belong to the cross -disciplinary category，But its connotation should not miss the attributes of the comprehensive discipline，That is not the cross of the mechanical，but an organic fusion beyond the cross，This can truly realize the political and academic requirements of "filling vacuum" in the junction of traditional basic disciplines。Basic theory of national security，Li Wenliang thinks，Basic theory of National Security bet365 best casino games Following the "Problem → Process → Results" framework Construction to build its theoretical paradigm。Grasp the "both ends", that is, "problems" and "results" are the key to understanding this theoretical framework。Yu Xiaofeng、Zhang Yazhen explores the value orientation of national security from the three dimensions of "big language context", "general concept" and "wide cross"、Disciplinary nature and talent training，Provide a new perspective for the construction of national security disciplines。In academic journals，"National Security Research" officially established，An important academic window for the Study of the Studies of National Security Theory and Reality Issues。

Beyond Western theory and explore China's path to each other

International relations theory has been dominated by Western theory for a long time，The explanation and prediction of international relations have been obviously insufficient for international relations、Lack of development motivation inside、Scarce of ideological theory 桎梏，Beyond Western International Relations Theory is imperative。For this，In 2022, there are many explorations in the Chinese international relations community。Sun Jisheng emphasized，China International Relations Theory Innovation needs to systematically study the influence of the current international relations on theoretical innovation，Better and condense Chinese diplomatic tradition and practice，From the level of the body、Experience level、Start at the specification level，Getting up China's diplomatic practice into theoretical understanding and knowledge system，Make it an integral part of the theoretical system of the international relations。There are also scholars from global international relations、Global Learning、Global History and other disciplines Criticize international relations theory，Breaking the binary barriers of Chinese and Western，Beyond Western International Relations Theory。Gao Peng、Zhu Yimin thinks，As a new international relations theory paradigm，Global International Relations has not only enriched and developed the theory of international relations research，It can also inspire Chinese scholars to understand more in the deeper level of international relations that contain Chinese non -western non -Western relations，Make China's international relations research more global care。Cai Tuo、Wang Jiarui proposed，Global Scholars itself is a learning about "global"，Taking the global body and the overall world as the research object，Core and soul is global，The globalist value of the world as a whole and the human center runs through。Wang Lixin pointed out，Global History Research has profoundly changed our description、The way to imagine and study world history and international relations，helps to promote international relations to become a more open、Disciplines that are more tolerant and less Western center color，Innovation of the theory of international relations。It is worth noting that，In order to better realize the dialogue between global history and international relations，Push the historical path of the research of international relations to in -depth，Breaking through Western international relations theory discourse lead traps。September 3, 2022，China Social Sciences Magazine Holds the "Global History and International Relations Theory Innovation" meeting，I made the first attempt in this area，and get positive response from the academic community。

In terms of reflecting on the theory of mainstream international relations in the West，Qin Yaqing starts from the outgoing view of quantum science，Fundamental criticism of the three major theories with traditional scientific concept，and according to this, I have proposed the problem of reconstruction of the knowledge view of international relations theory。and lack systemic cognition for the current international relations academic circles，As a result, when facing the complexity problem，The transformation problem from mechanical thinking to complex thinking cannot be realized。Liu Mengqiang proposed three complexity kernels，Summary method、The complexity features of the status of the international relations system、Treat complexity as complexity，to break the imprisonment of the traditional mechanical world view。

　　Reflection and Outlook

In addition to the progress of the above discipline and the exploration of important issues，China International Relations Discipline in 2022 generally presents focusing on China、The future is available、Focus on the three trends of discipline construction，and young scholars are artificial intelligence、Groups of digital technology，The future is available。

Focus on China

The topic of international relations in 2022 pays more attention to based on China、Depart from China。Common value of human beings around the world、New Era Civilization Exchange and Mutual Learning、New international relations、Global Security initiative、Global Development Initiative, etc., reflects the keywords of Xi Jinping's new era of socialist thought with Chinese characteristics in the study.。The theoretical connotation of digging and summing up Chinese practice has also become an important dimension for discipline theoretical exploration。Zheng Yu tapped from the practice of poverty alleviation in China and summarized the gradual balance mode of poverty governance，and inspected in Africa's practice。

Follow the area

As mentioned earlier，Due to the global area of ​​the new crown pneumonia, the region and the international situation caused by the bet365 Play online games conflict between the Russian and Ukraine conflict，Judgment about the "Great Turce" is still the focus of attention in the academic community。But in addition to the attention of global levels mentioned earlier，Research focus has also sank to region，Regional and regionalist research is valued。Geng Xiefeng analyzed the phenomenon of inverse regionalization in the process of globalization，It is believed that the relationship between regionalization and globalization should be correctly understood，Break the misunderstanding of recognition，Different types that correctly identify the regionalization。Wang Zhi advocates based on comparative regionalism，The difference between the concepts adhered to the "Belt and Road" initiative and the differences between Western regionalism，Theoretical China Practice，Planted China's perspective into regionalism。

Discipline Construction

The future discussion of the discipline continues to be in -depth。Wang Yili pointed out，Discuss the Chinese school，China International Relations Theory is also good，Farewell to the impulse，Out of the loss of the theory，The myths and comparative political sciences of global international relations、Traps of comparative international relations research。Chinese experience does not target the revelation of any country，Enlightenment is the whole world; China is not a rise，but revival; logic beyond nationality、Rise thinking。The great rejuvenation of China will naturally produce the characteristics of the national characteristics、Universal international relations theory，Generate Chinese Qi Pai、Chinese style academic system、discourse system and theoretical system。Some scholars explain from the perspective of professionalism and independent discipline systems of international relations，Yan Xuetong proposed four principles for the construction of international relations，First, emphasize the academicity of discipline development，Avoid the construction of disciplines from common sense opinions; the second is to deepen the academic knowledge of small majors，Avoid famous discipline construction; the third is to create universal knowledge，Avoid the unreliableness of knowledge; the fourth is to clarify the discipline of individuals，Avoid all scientific scholars。These four principles provide new ideas for academic specialization in the formation of the international relations discipline system。

Young scholars

Young scholars are artificial intelligence、Big Data、Discussion on emerging technologies and international relations in the universe of the universe，Strive to keep synchronization with the world，In -depth falsification technology、Calculated publicity、Research results obtained in the aspects of social robots can be remarkable，The forward and development of the theory of international relations has accumulated strength。

But what I have to admit is，The international relations in 2022 are still in a state of "ready to go"，Study issues、Research methods and other aspects are more for the continuation of 2021，Compared with the international situation of Boshiyun's weird，Still slightly calm and dull。Basic theoretical research on the subject is still weak，The communication and integration of the interdisciplinary and interdisciplinary interdisciplinary still needs to be advanced，Insufficient knowledge sharing、Scarce academic criticism is still an important factor in restricting the development of disciplines，The self -knowledge system of China International Relations Theory Construction of Ren Ren away。

(Writing: Guo Siyan)