Analysis of two points of analysis philosophy and European philosophy can be described as the old talk of modern Western philosophy，Reflection related to this distinction is not a fresh question。And the reason why we restart the discussion of this topic in the context of Chinese ideological context today，Still has important theoretical significance。Professor Zhou Beihai's "European Philosophy Logic?" ——The Analysis of Philosophy and European Philosophy "(hereinafter referred to as" A Debate ")，constitutes a very good argument starting point。

　　bet365 live casino games

First，With the modern Western philosophy research in the Chinese world, it has increasingly entered professionalism、Standardized stage，Two of the two ideological styles is very different、There is a big philosophical road for working methods，More and more showing the condition of mutual diaphragm。So，Two traditions on each end of each end are limited to their own "cave" danger。Second，This kind of dispute and diaphragm is also more clearly reflected in teaching。In the dramatic language，Analysis in front of youth who studies Western philosophy or two roads in Europe，Must choose one of them，Faced with the completely different philosophy of this time。Of course，This is an exaggerated saying。Not exaggerated is，This dispute and diaphragm are growing into "elephant in the room"。About the analytical dispute between philosophy and European philosophy，There have been hot discussions in the international academic community，For example, the analysis philosopher jointly accused Drida、Judging it an event that is "pseudo -philosophy"。Another as Apeer、Habermas and Henry, such as older generations of German philosophers，and contemporary British and American philosophers like Brandon，All start from their respective traditions，Has made great efforts to communicate。But we only need to look at the professional philosophical journal，or the daily life of the Department of Philosophy，I will find that the diaphragm of these two does not decrease with the efforts of the masters，I just bet365 best casino games get discussing less，Because this has become an almost well -known fact。

Kermid thinking is exactly the fact that the facts are the problem，Promote "familiarity" into the practice of "true knowledge"。"Debate" is clear enough and sharp enough to throw the problem。Its sharp character is particularly manifested in，Analysis of the dispute between philosophy and European philosophy is not present as Aristotle -Plato -style dispute，Instead, it is presented as a dispute between Plato and the wise master。Not a dispute between two philosophy，but the dispute between philosophy and pseudo philosophy。Socrates -Plato traditionally decisively promoted the argument to argument，Building philosophical thinking based on logic，The distinction between philosophical demonstration and political rhetoric was completed。Analysis philosophy based on formal logic and its contemporary forms (mathematical logic/modern logic) is therefore deemed to be the real passion of Plato，Not only inheriting Plato the most important thing、The most core、The most correct element，And abandoned the "Literature Shell"，It has developed a logical form that is still suspected of rough in Plato。On the contrary，The legitimacy of European philosophy looks extremely suspicious in this narrative。European philosophy is either based on formal logic，Either you have to have your own logic，Otherwise, it will be no different from wisdom。If European philosophy is also based on formal logic，Then the name of European philosophy has no need to exist，All philosophy is analyzing philosophy。In other words，European philosophy If you can't explain your logic problems，So according to the truth of the article "Debate"，Either closed the door and break business，Either you have to be generously called。Facing this sharp allegations，Therefore, it is necessary to talk about the logic of the philosophy of the continental philosophy。

　　European philosophy and reality

The logical problem of European philosophy is a problem with its own trap。We only need to reflect on a little bit，It will find that European philosophy and analytical philosophy are two completely asymmetric naming。Single logical point of view，European philosophy is a geographical and cultural concept，Corresponding to British and American philosophy，The two together formed Western philosophy。bet365 Play online games But if this is named，Then the problem has become the difference between European philosophy and British and American philosophy in cultural attributes，So the two can not only coexist，And may wish to learn from each other，All the sharp character contained in the dispute between the European philosophy and analytical philosophy of philosophy will suddenly dissipate。

To understand the true ideological problems contained in the name of European philosophy，We have to start from this distinction of ideological and historical context，not alone in terms of logic (or，Start from this distinctioned conceptual logic，instead of starting from form logic)。This context is the rapid advancement of empirical science in the second half of the 19th century and the traditional disintegration of conceptual conceptual theory。Open it by German philosopher Freder，Yu Russell、Moore and Wittgenstein and so on in the UK，This philosophical revolution that was first promoted by Calnap and then promoted in the United States，There is a high degree of methodology consciousness，Its initial motivation is to adhere to the position in the resistance college through language and logical analysis、The conceptual theory of the new knowledge and situation has lost the conceptual theory of response ability。The so -called analytical philosophy，It is the self -naming of such a philosophical movement。Like the phenomenon of the same period，This naming is not by chance to focus on the focus。European philosophy is "named" in this sense，and this "naming" has already reflected the problem of problems。Analysis of philosophy although there is a clear way to consciousness，It is difficult to use a corresponding method to discuss terms to summarize your opposite side。This is first because "European Philosophy" is an excessive frame，Inside all the philosophical forms that are different from analytical philosophy，So it is almost impossible to get appropriately summarized through a single name on a method; second，Because traditional philosophy is not like analyzing philosophy as its own foothold，Some genres in the European philosophy，For example, interpretation，I have deep reflection on the "method worship" of scientificism。"and" and "existence and time" of "Truth and Methods" are "and"。

Brief words，The name of "European Philosophy" Bet365 app download comes from the self -naming of analyzing philosophy。The so -called "European Philosophy"，In essence, this naming operation is roughly summarized for the traditional philosophical form that is different from its own。This summary does not face the logic of the European philosophy，Just through such a convenient label to complete self -legalization。Let's talk about "the logical problem of European philosophy"，Therefore, two traps must be faced: (1) Set the agenda by the other party、Standard the trap of the perspective;。But，Facing clear and sharp allegations，We have to talk about the "logical problem of continental philosophy" for our own defense。Our talk can only be a theory。

　　Priority logic, dialectical logic and metaphor

After the above pre -explanations are done，We can conclude: European philosophy is by no means not to talk about logic，It's just that the nature of the logic and its possible boundaries have a completely different view。The author still thinks，This completely different view and deeper，more fully reflects the philosophical reflection character。Decisive insights about this clearly expressed in the naming moment of "priority logic": "It only deal with the laws of intellectual and rational，But only within the scope of these rules and objects of the congenital and earth，Not like universal logic，No difference and experienced knowledge、It also has a relationship with pure rational knowledge。"Kant here does not use the" formal logic "to mention it，But what he refers to is the so -called formal logic。Logic is the form of form，Why is it called "formal logic"? The reason for this is probably in this decisive distinction of Kant。In the analysis of the dispute between philosophy and European philosophy，European philosophy is named; in the distinction between form logic and priority logic，Form logic may be the party named。We only have in -depth history of thought，can understand the "logic" in it;，will miss the decisive problem in it，Let's understand the decisive insights。

Kant's insight can be summarized as the following two points: (1) logic can be related to objects or content，And the logic of this kind of object and content is true and important in philosophy，The logic of pure forms does not actually enter bet365 live casino games the interior of the philosophical problem; (2) Once the object is related to the object，It is necessary to distinguish between the object。Kant especially emphasizes，Make a critical distinction between empirical objects and concepts beyond experience。Aristotle is generally regarded as the founder of formal logic，These two insights of Kant can actually be traced back to Aristotle。Because of the works such as "Category"，Not only logic，and can be read as his (early) existence theory。That's it，Isn't it the same thing about sub -logic? And once it is related to objects，From the perspective of Kant，It will further encounter the problem of the boundary: we use to say the category of the experimental，Is it suitable for the concept of overwhelming? These are two kinds of fundamental different "existences"。The existence theory has a crack from the Kant -style perspective，We cannot simply misappropriate the scope of the experience and the corresponding logic to the concept of overwhelming。

Turn in turn，We can also say，Kant -style perspective while breaking the way of questioning of traditional existence theory，In fact, it has also opened a new field of vision of existence theory，Release a new existence theory potential。And this is exactly what we understand that the dialectical logic of Hegel -style dialectics，It is even an effective starting point for our understanding of the metaphor of the Nigerian metaphorical philosophy。Of course, this is a quite unusual judgment，It is related to the major ideological joints within the European philosophy，Non -words can be exhausted。We are just satisfied with emphasis，Priority logic can be called a content logic。From the perspective of this kind of content logic，Form logic that does not make any content distinguishes, so it can't help staying on the surface。Once in -depth content，Hegel -style dialectical logic and Nietzsche metaphors are already at the door。Hegel's logic is presented as a road of dialectical development，And the reason why this dialectical logic is at the same time is existing theory，Because he is not talking about logic，Instead, how to construct a seemingly pure form of conceptual way to construct the existence of things，How to contain the potential beyond itself、Inner requirements are bet365 best casino games more reasonable conceptual ways，So in the internal contradictory logic development, all aspects of the existence of existence，Until this logic -the completion or self -consistent system。Of course we can question whether Hegel's overall structure has made excessive reasonable descriptions for reality，It can also be fully argued with Hegel in the rationality of some links，But we cannot ignore a basic insight in Hegel's dialectical logic: philosophy is not purely form、The concept of empty cave that is not related to reality，but deep into reality、The concept of constructing the basic perspective of our view of reality。Hegel -style insights are actually Kant -style insight，It's just a more complex version。

Metaphor of Nietzsche，It can be regarded as the further development of European philosophy.。If our conceptual method and related logic forms stipulate our "prejudice" and "perspective"，It also stipulates the way of manifestation of things，So are we going to include metaphors in the field of vision outside the logic? Isn't we often misappropriated a language language to say another field (this is the original meaning of metaphor)?，or the "Tao" in the sense of the East，Isn't we all facing difficulties in words，Therefore, the conceptual way of using things in the experience to say metaphorical saying，Does it construct your own "vision"? further，Is the metaphor in this sense more fundamental than concepts and logic? And the structure of this field of vision is just a matter of speculation，Isn't it a certain practice problem and life that needs to be faintly dominated behind? Nietzsche -style spectrum is therefore "logic"，It's just that this logic is also not a smooth form logic，but a kind of content logic far from complex。and，This "logic" eventually broke through Platoism，From logic to metaphor。but but，The relationship between Nietzsche and Plato is complex。Nietzsche's metaphorical philosophy may just help us recover the Plato abandoned by the philosophy of analytical philosophy。At this time, Plato is not an analysis of philosophy.，The Plato dialogue at this time is no longer a "literary shell" that can be abandoned or even deserved.。

Summary，European philosophy not only has logic，And logic really becomes the core question in the European bet365 Play online games philosophy。To understand the battle between philosophy and European philosophy，We have to understand the history of the conceptual history。Analysis of philosophy when the rise is new Kantism and Hegelism，is the logic logic and dialectical logic; analyzing philosophy the most exclusive later，It is also the metaphor of Nietzsche。But we can go back today and ask: Does this philosophical revolution abandon the real problem of philosophy since Plato? after all，Plato is not only a logical debate，His conceptual theory also insights，logic is really deeply rooted in reality，Constructing reality。，We might as well add say，Dialogue in Plato only presents the paragraph of logical argument，He is full of intellectual atmosphere。

　　(The author is a professor at the School of Humanities of Tongji University)