With academic research in academic research、The increasing number of large -scale cooperation，Discussion on the right to sign the thesis is becoming more and more intense。Recent，The American "Nature" magazine published a comment article，This reporter also conducted an interview。

　　Bet365 lotto review

Young scientific researchers usually attach great importance to publishing papers，Special cherishing the opportunity to be able to seize your own name in the thesis。But，Many young researchers have contributed in academic programs，But I did not get the corresponding signature opportunity。This situation is not uncommon in the Western academic community，and constantly criticized by young researchers。

Current，Most academic journals internationally follow the author system。bet365 Play online games For example，According to the relevant standards of the Editorial Committee of the International Medical Journal，Want to get the author's identity，You need to prove what important content did you contribute to the first draft of the paper or contribute during the revision。This means，If scientific researchers are collected with data、Data analysis or program design and other professional division of labor methods participate in scientific research items led by others，Its contribution is likely to be ignored。

Not long ago，Researcher Xue Yi, a researcher at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, and the members of the scientific research team jointly published a paper on lithium battery research in the "Nature" magazine。Xue Yi told this reporter，During the scientific research process，Many participants will be ignored，Many of them have assumed a large number of specialized basic work，But because they were not core members of the group since the project was founded，So when the thesis is finally bet365 Play online games published，It cannot reflect their participation and contribution value。

From the perspective of the post -doctoral school of Harvard University of Harvard University，Doctoral students "work" to the mentor still have universality in the West。Many young researchers participated in scientific research topics，But cannot get the right to sign the results，Even for this phenomenon just "dare to be angry or dare not speak"。Today's author system is reasonable，But it really needs more evaluation indicators to represent respect for other participants。In fact，Many scientific research projects are collective cooperation，If in the medical field，Many scientific research projects will recruit volunteers to participate in experiments，Volunteers undertake high -risk tasks for the first time，and provide valuable information for scientific researchers，But the name of the volunteer never appeared in the history of scientific research。

　Respect the contribution of all participants

Alex Holcombe, a professor of psychology at the University of Sydney, Australia, bet365 live casino games recently published on the official website of Nature Magazine，The academic community must adopt a new academic contribution evaluation system，It is used to present the role played by all participants among them。

Holkum said，During his doctoral student，Professor has invited him to participate in some experimental projects as a programmer，But cannot get the right to sign the results。He found，programmer、Technical personnel will often be abandoned during the scientific research process，As a result, the scientific research process cannot truly reflect the efforts of all contributors。Scientific research business is a team action，People need to respect and praise those who work hard for scientific progress。

Announcement of Evaluation Model

To change the current evaluation system，The academic world has been working hard。

2009 "Nature" magazine issued a regulation，Requires each author to describe its contribution in the writing process of thesis。But，"Nature" magazine did not contribute to the standardized text templates for how to "describe" various contributions，Bet365 app download So，The author can only write a variable non -standardized text to describe his contribution，And such a "description" is obviously difficult to play a reference effect on future recruitment committees and scientific research funders。

Current，It is admired by many academic institutions in an evaluation model called "Credit"，It is caused by the contribution of more quantitative scientific research。Introduction to Holkum，This evaluation model can currently be able to "conceptualization、Method Theory、Software、Project Management and Data Management "14 types of contribution types are quantified。For example，The "Survey" contribution type in the model contains data collection，Reflecting the respect of data collection in the scientific research process。

Some scholars said，Traditionally，The author's weight will decrease as the number of authors signature authors increases，The more authors signed，The honor weight of each author will be reduced。This will cause the scientific research team to control the number of signature staff。academic bet365 Play online games appeal，Formulate differentiation、Scientific research measurement indicators with rich evaluation functions，Let each participant get the respect you deserve，Therefore, scientific research resources more efficiently，Improve the efficiency and achievements of scientific research output。

(Our newspaper Boston, August 7th)