Improve Researchers Evaluation Standards
July 24, 2020 04:27 Source: "China Social Sciences", July 24, 2020, No. 1974 Author: Wang Junmei/Compilation
Comprehensive foreign media report The United States Daily Science Network recently issued a post,In the field of academic research,The phenomenon of "elimination if not published" intensified,The academic community's criticism of this phenomenon is also endless。Recent,A international research Bet365 lotto review team summarizes five principles,And proposed to apply these principles to academic recruitment and promotion,To improve the level of scientific research integrity,Increase the social benefits of scientific research。
Canadian scientist David Moher said,The traditional "elimination" mechanism of the traditional "elimination" is based on the number of papers published by researchers、Other researchers quote the frequency of their papers,and the value of research funds,Let'bet365 live casino games s assess researchers。This is a simple evaluation method,But these standards cannot fully reflect the rigor of the researchers' work and their contribution to scientific research and society。
Researchers said,The five principles of the new and perfect principles are designed to fill the blank blank of research institutions evaluating researchers' standards。These five principles include: evaluate researchers from the entire process from research concepts to the output of results; attach importance to bet365 Play online games the accuracy and transparency of research reports; attach importance to the openness of research,Research method、Materials and data are made public; attach importance to the breadth of research and academic activities; increase investment in academic activities of research projects。(Wang Junmei/Compilation)
Editor in charge: Changchang