Current，Scientific researchers face "No Publishing，Disappearing "single -oriented evaluation pressure。In the scientific research evaluation system of countries around the world，The number of publications and influences of papers is very important，It is related to the academic achievements and status of scientific researchers，At the same time, it is closely related to personal title evaluation and promotion。July 19，Research results of Harry Van Dalen, a professor at the School of Economics Management, School of Economics Management, School of Economics Management, School of Economics, the University of Political Science and Economics, the University of Political Science and Economics,，The current academic circles "Not published，Disappearing "academic achievement output method does not match the internal driving target of scientific innovation。Dalen advocates the use of an academic management form that focuses more on input and promotes scientific innovation，Cultivate scholars with "ideological taste"，Break the bad orientation of "Theory"。

　　bet365 live casino games

For a long time，In some Western countries，The academic community has always been considered Bet365 lotto review an industry that has been considered to receive attention and the rewards.。Some scholars think，Let non -market -oriented incentive factors dominate the scientific research and academic community，It helps scientific researchers to solve major scientific problems，and therefore get a peer recognition。Therefore，It should make non -market -oriented incentive factors the most valued incentive factor that scholars value，Incentive factors such as money or employment retreat，Only as the benefits of attached existence。But，Competition from all walks of life in recent years has intensified，The academic world is no exception。Many non -market -oriented incentive measures have gradually been replaced by market -oriented incentive measures，All kinds of influence scientific research funding、Evaluation indicators for income and employment occupy the dominant position，Following the evaluation index has become the leading strategy of scholars。

From the current point of view，Scholars must prove the evaluation system of their own value through academic achievements，by the government、Personal acceptance of universities and scholars。Darren's survey shows，Publishing academic works is the main pressure source of scholars，Striving for scientific research、Teaching、Administrative affairs, etc. are all behind。Some hope to be promoted to teaching assistant、Scholars Bet365 app download of Associate Professor are facing very large pressure。Among the professor group，Also nearly 60%of people said，The pressure on publishing papers is not small。

　　The current evaluation system brings pressure

Dalen investigated some Dutch economists，Try to study "No Publishing，Disappearing "is how to play a role in practice。About 2/3 respondents think，This pressure has certain benefits，But it will also cause serious disadvantages，If academic dislocation or ignore reality problems。Only 1/3 of the respondents think，This kind of pressure is only good and there is no disadvantage。Generally speaking，Many scholars are "not published，Disappearing "is suspicious。

Moderate pressure is beneficial，But if an article published in top journals becomes the only goal，It will cause harm to scholars。This kind of competition based on a single evaluation system，It will promote scholars to be keen to publish articles，instead of scientific research or innovation。In Dalon's survey，63%of scholars think，The university does not care about the content of their published works，I only care about which publications and quantities are published。Publication level of publishing articles、Evaluation specifications for quantity and content may cause scholars to withdraw from academic competition。In the survey, 33%of scholars said，Because of the pressure of the Bet365 lotto review results，They have considered leaving the academic world。

More and more scholars spend their minds on how to publish articles，But I don’t work hard on the content of the thesis，Thus caused academic misconduct and other behaviors and even when the journal was withdrawn.。Studies show，Compared to the dissertation in the weak competition，Some academic papers in some intense competition are more likely to fake。Australian Open access strategy team leader Virginia Barbour said，Scholars are facing tremendous pressure to publish the paper on international academic journals，The number of top journals is very limited，As a result, many important research results cannot be published、Obstacles of interdisciplinary research、Lack of recognition of the results of non -thesis research results。The worse thing is，Some scholars have published papers in the top journal，Perhaps compromise in terms of scientific research integrity and standards。

In addition，"Not published，Disappearing "will also affect the writing experience of scholars。Marion Heron, a senior lecturer at the University of Sarri University, said，If the ultimate purpose of academic writing is publishing，So this concept will cover up most of the value of the academic writing process，It will also reduce the opportunity for the development and collaborative innovation Bet365 app download of scholars。Heron and others interviewed 7 scholars in the field of higher education at different careers，and ask them to reflect on the problems faced in academic writing。Research Discovery，All academic writing processes for publishing will damage the creativity of scholars，The writing content of the same system will also have a negative effect on academic writing experience。

　Cultivate scholars with "ideological taste"

From the current point of view，Academic circles are generally dissatisfied with existing evaluation indicators，But it is unable to change the status quo。Dalen explained to，First，Evaluation indicators have become part of the business model of the university，​​Unable to remove。Next，If you want to improve the existing evaluation standard，It is necessary to cover social correlation、More new dimensions such as open science，These more fine indicators will bring more management difficulties。

How can Hyundai University get the best management effect without resorting to evaluation indicators? Darren said，So far，The most important thing for universities is how to choose and educate people who can publish results，instead of how to cultivate scholars with "ideological taste"。Therefore，Scholars who are current and future will be changing indicators、Promotion of factors such as interest groups becomes unique scientists，will only be obsessed with bet365 Play online games completion indicators。Dalen Suggestion，Change the governance method，Looking for an alternative to the existing evaluation indicators，、Cultivate scholars with "ideological taste"，and make it social。If the university wants to strive to strive for scientific innovation，It is necessary to re -obtain autonomy，This step is to start from choosing a manager who really knows science，At the same time, "No Publishing，Disappearing "lesson lesson。

Barber thinks，The incentives and support mechanisms of the academic world shall be designed to promote good academic practice，instead of giving birth to anti -corruga and other behaviors。Current，Pass review is the main tool for scholars to evaluate the paper before publishing papers，But it cannot solve all the fraud or hasty problems in the academic community。Now，The academic world is working hard to seek a means to promote good academic practice，More and more scientist groups gathered together，jointly formulate scientific research specifications and repetitive standards。other，The application of many technological innovation methods will also improve the reliability of scientific research，Open access is one of the important means。