Published an article in traditional academic journals，Usually requires a long and tedious peer review process，and pre -printing is an article without peer evaluation，Can be faster、Publish research results more openly，It is a positive response to the disadvantages of the academic community to the timeliness of the timeliness of the peer evaluation system。Current，Pre -printing book has become very common in the life science world。but，Due to lack of supporting quality control and academic evaluation mechanisms，The recognition of the pre -print book in the academic world is lower than that of traditional academic journals。This has caused many researchers to publish high -quality papers in pre -printing in this form，This hinders the potential of pre -printing the potential to change the academic publishing model。July 2021，Open access journal Elife in the field of biology began to adopt the article "Published bet365 best casino games first，Re -judging "policy，and publicize all the peer review reports。This is a self -organized peer review mode that adapts to the open access environment，For the improvement of the pre -printing book、Innovative academic publishing mode is of great significance。

　Bet365 lotto review

2011，ELIFE Journal was by the Institute of Medical Research, the United States、The Max Planck Institute of Germany and the British Huikang Trust Foundation jointly invested and founded，Its purpose is to promote the publication and sharing of important scientific achievements，Improve the efficiency of the paper published。According to "Published bet365 best casino games first，Re -judging "policy，ELIFE only reviews and published in biorxiv、MEDRXIV and ARXIV pre -print papers published on this server。This model highlights the value of the pre -print，It also combines the pre -print book with the peer review system。

Under the traditional peer review system，Journal staff will classify the manuscript first，Then the experts were given to the expert and decided whether the manuscript was published，The review opinions only share with bet365 best casino games the author himself。Biologist at the University of California Berkeley、Elife editor -in -chief Michael Eisen said，"Posted first，Re -judging "mode combines this traditional approach with pre -print，It marks the major change of the traditional peer review system，Expanding the time and scope of sharing，It can attract more scholars to recognize and join this mode。

The ideal academic publishing mode should have fast review speed、Fast release speed、Low cost、Free acquisition and other features。Current，Most pre -printing servers can achieve rapid release、Low cost and free access。But，Lack of peer review means that pre -printing is difficult to obtain extensive recognition in the academic community。ELIFE can make a quick evaluation of a large number of manuscripts，These reviews will be expected to become an important indicator for measuring the quality of the pre -printing research。Literature、Technology and Publishing Professor Martin Eve said，Elife related practices，Reform helping to promote the existing academic publishing model。

Eisen said，"Submit thesis — Comment -Accept/Reject bet365 live casino games thesis — Repent Mode" is the crux of the current academic publishing system。In this mode，Scholars need to spend a lot of time and energy to "sell" thesis，until the final publication。"Posted first，Re -judging "policy not only improves the paper release efficiency，And an important step for academic publishing towards life -free publishing。In the Internet era，Periodicals are more inclined to bear a role that focuses on the review and management after the publication of the paper。

　Better to "Reject Culture"

The scientific research funding and career promotion of most scholars are closely related to journal papers，But the papers they submit are usually ended with rejection。Kelly Ann Allen, a senior lecturer at the School of Education, Monash University, Australia, believes，Current，The academic community even formed a "rejection culture"。From 50%of general journals to 92%of well -known journals such as "Nature"，Such a high rejection rate brings some bad consequences。First，Wasting the valuable professional learning and development opportunities of scholars。Second，Waste the time and energy of bet365 Play online games scholars，increased their workload。Sometimes researchers need to spend a lot of time to prepare for the scientific research funding plan，But most proposals cannot get funding because they have not published relevant research results。Last，"Rejecting Culture" above over -workload will increase scholars' pressure and anxiety。Psychological Health's work satisfaction with scholars、Productivity and overall happiness have an important impact。

The manuscript of the manuscript has not yet entered the review process.。Eisen thinks，If it is not appropriately evaluated，It is difficult to make an accurate judgment on a paper。From the long run,，The practice of simply accepting or refusing the thesis is unreasonable。Different from this approach is，"Posted first，Re -judgment "mode to evaluate the manuscript in the way of the review of the reviewers and editors to publicize the paper，Opinions that are not provided or not approved。Its goal is，Transfer people's attention from the pursuit of high -level journals to the specific contribution to specific scientific work，Instead of the journal published Bet365 lotto review on the paper as the main quality measurement standard。

John Hattie, Professor John Hattie, Professor of the University of Melbourne University of Melbourne, Australia，To improve the academic publishing process in various ways，Editor and reviewer should provide comments and feedback to scholars in time。This is inconsistent with ELIFE's idea of ​​combining peer evaluation and pre -print.。Eisen said，Published on the pre -printing server，Not only can there be multiple forms，Experts can also continue to evaluate the paper at different times。In short，What they eventually want to change is "No Publishing，Disappearing "single academic publishing concept。