bet365 bonus bets newspaper’s comprehensive foreign media reports In recent years，Internet companies in order to improve the accuracy of advertising，Continuously refine user profiles。The platform not only collects basic information (name from users、Address、Mail)，Additional bet365 bonus bets (age is also purchased or exchanged through bet365 bonus bets brokers、Family composition、Health status)。Recently，Katharine Kemp, senior lecturer at the School of Law and Justice, University of New South Wales, Australia, wrote，In accordance with the Australian Privacy Principles，It is illegal for Internet companies to obtain user bet365 bonus bets through third parties to enrich user profiles。However，This principle is difficult to implement in practice，This also leads to more users falling into disadvantageous situations when safeguarding their personal privacy rights。

The Australian Privacy Shield Principles apply to most businesses in Australia with an annual revenue of more than A million and smaller bet365 bonus bets business organizations。The third paragraph of this principle is clearly stated in paragraph 6，Apps must collect personal information directly from the relevant user，User bet365 bonus bets cannot be obtained through third parties or other channels。Kemp thinks，This "direct collection rule" strengthens users' control over collected information，Ability to prevent leakage of bet365 bonus bets containing sensitive information，Protected personal privacy。

Kemp Discovery，Many bet365 bonus bets agencies and Internet companies ignore this principle，Bypassing users to obtain bet365 bonus bets through third parties。For example，In privacy agreement，Companies are often vague about which organizations they share user information with and where they obtain additional user information。At the same time，Many companies do not explain why collecting information directly from users is unreasonable or unfeasible。Some companies also provide additional privacy policy terms regarding sharing bet365 bonus bets with “Trusted bet365 bonus bets Partners”，To prove that indirect information collection is legitimate。Based on the above situation，Kemp believes that even if the user agrees to a similar privacy agreement，Internet companies still do not meet the exceptions allowed under Australian privacy laws for obtaining information from third parties。For example，User under investigation for inappropriate behavior，Or the user needs to update their address for delivery of legal or official documents。

Currently，There are already large bet365 bonus bets brokers that clearly oppose this principle。As proposed in the report submitted by Experian in January 2022，Only Internet giants with large customer bases will not be affected by this principle。For companies with fewer users and bet365 bonus bets，The inability to purchase bet365 bonus bets from third parties will result in them being eliminated from market competition。However，There are also many digital platforms that support Australia’s implementation of the Privacy Shield，Because user bet365 bonus bets should not be freely available to all companies。

In the past three years，Australian consumer watchdog continues to call for further improvement of privacy protection laws，To reduce the negative impact of intrusive bet365 bonus bets collection on users。Kemp said，In order to protect the interests of users，It’s time for privacy regulators to prioritize enforcing this principle。

　　（Liu Yuwei/Compiled）