As a new force in the scientific research team，Young researchers are promoting scientific development、Promoting academic progress plays a unique and important role。Austrian official website recently reported，In order to explore whether the researchers will encounter obstacles during the peer evaluation due to the relatively low reputation due to the low reputation，from Instalbrook University and Graz University、Research team composed of researchers at Chapman University in the United States has recently carried out an experiment。According to the idea of ​​Jürgen Huber, a professor of finance at In Subrook University，2002 Nobel Prize in Economics、Professor Vernon L. Smith at the economics and law of Chapman University and the assistant researcher at Chapman University Bet365 lotto review Sabiou Inoua jointly wrote a paper，and submitted to the Journal of Ais Weimer Publishing Group "Behavior and Experimental Finance Magazine"。Edit of this journal、Associate Professor Stefan Palan, associate professor at Graz University, sent a peer review invitation to 3300 reviewers，Among them, 534 people accepted the invitation。

The reviewer got three different information about the author of the thesis。One of the authors informing the paper in the first group is Funnon Smith，One of the authors in the second group is Sabio Inna，The third group has not been informed of the author identity。For the same paper，Only 23%of the first group reviewers are advised not to publish，65%of the reviewers in the second group of reviewers given the comments that are not published，48%of the reviewers of the third group are recommended not to publish。Under the conditions with the same quality of research results，The author with high reputation is easier to get higher evaluation，Then get more opportunities for publication。Bet365 app download The research team has published this discovery in the "National Academy of Sciences"，The title of the article is "Nobel and Primary: The author's prestige influence the peer review"。

As a "party"，Yinu said in an interview with this newspaper，More fair peer review system will benefit young researchers，Because the results are published, the key standards that run through the academic career，It is particularly important in the early stages of career。Hubel told reporters，The successful release of research results is very important for young researchers，Because the results of the results are a major factor in determining the decision -making of academic circles。Young researchers are facing the fierce competition of teaching positions，Only those who continue to produce high -quality academic achievements with peers can be selected smoothly。If the author's prestige will affect the publishing process of the paper，So，The young researchers with well -known scholars among the thesis will have one more advantage than others。He thinks，A prejudice bet365 live casino games caused by the differences between the reputation of the author or the author during the peer evaluation process，Not only can provide more equal occupational development opportunities for young researchers in the academic world，It can also make peer review more focused on the quality itself，Reduce the interference of high -quality research。

For how to optimize the existing peer review system，Inn said to reporters，As they proposed in the article，In his opinion，Promoting two -way anonymous peer evaluation practice can reduce this type of prejudice that occurred in the experiment。Hubel also expressed similar views。He mentioned to reporters，In the case of two -way anonymous，The reviewer does not know who the author is，The author doesn’t know who the reviewer is，This can alleviate the effect of the author's identity on the peer review process，It is relatively simple to implement。Of course，This depends on the specific situation。Pre -publishing papers on the Internet in the form of pre -printing Bet365 lotto review books is not universal，In these fields，Double anonymous practice can play a greater role，It can balance the impact of prestige high and low on researchers。and in the research field that has become a practice in those online pre -printing books，The effectiveness of the dual anonymous system will be limited，But the reviewer can still avoid deliberately searching for information about the author。

Hubel mentioned to reporters，Their research mainly tests the one -way anonymous and two -way anonymous peer review process，But，Research results evaluation also involves many other methods。For example，Some researchers provide some reference guidelines for the reviewer，Used to answer specific questions about the manuscripts they are reviewing。In his opinion，This structured peer review should be committed to helping reviewers pay attention to the facts，Reduce the impact of other factors。Some people are exploring a more open peer review process，Allow editor、Direct communication bet365 live casino games between the reviewer and the author。This method is designed to make relevant parties work together，Discuss the problem together and seek a solution，to improve this research results。Hu Bell thinks，Compared with traditional one -way or two -way anonymous peer review process，How the actual effect of the above method is still a subject to be solved，Therefore，He expects the academic community to conduct further research in these directions。