As a new force in the scientific research team，Young researchers are promoting scientific development、Plays a unique and important role in promoting academic progress。Recent reports from the official website bet365 score University of Innsbruck, Austria，To explore whether researchers encounter obstacles in the peer review process due to their relatively low reputation when publishing results，By the University of Innsbruck and the University of Graz、A research team composed of researchers from Chapman University in the United States recently conducted an experiment。Based on the ideas of Jürgen Huber, professor of finance at the University of Innsbruck，Winner bet365 score 2002 Nobel Prize in Economics、Vernon L. Smith, Professor of Economics and Law at Chapman University. Smith) and Sabiou Inoua, a research associate at Chapman University, co-authored a paper，And submitted to the Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance, a journal of Elsevier Publishing Group in the Netherlands。Editor of this journal、Stefan Palan, associate professor of finance at the University of Graz, sends peer review invitations to 3,300 reviewers，534 of them accepted the invitation。

Reviewers were given three different pieces of information about the authors bet365 score paper。The first group was told that one bet365 score authors bet365 score paper was Vernon Smith，The second group was told that one bet365 score authors bet365 score paper was Sabio Inua，The third group was not informed bet365 score authorship。For the same paper，Only 23% bet365 score first group of reviewers recommended not publishing，65% bet365 score second group of reviewers gave review opinions not to be published，48% bet365 score third group of reviewers recommended not publishing。Under the condition that the quality bet365 score research results is the same，Authors with high reputation are more likely to receive higher ratings，And then get more publishing opportunities。The research team has published this finding in the Proceedings bet365 score National Academy of Sciences，The title bet365 score article is "Nobels and Juniors: Author Reputation Affects Peer Review"。

As a “party”，Inua said in an interview with this newspaper，Young researchers would benefit greatly from a fairer peer review system，Because publication of results is a key criterion throughout the entire academic career，Especially important in the early stages of your career。Huber told reporters，Being able to successfully publish research results is very important for young researchers，Because the status of publication of results is a major factor in determining academic recruitment decisions。Young researchers face fierce competition for teaching positions，Only those who continue to produce high-quality peer-reviewed academic results can be successfully selected。If the author’s reputation will affect the publication process bet365 score paper，Then，Young researchers who have well-known scholars among their co-authors will have an advantage over others。He thinks，Reduce bias caused by differences in the reputation bet365 score author or the author's affiliation during the peer review process，Not only can it provide more equal career development opportunities for young researchers in academia，It can also allow peer review to focus more on the quality bet365 score research itself，Reduce interference with high-quality research。

On how to optimize the existing peer review system，Inua told reporters，As they put it in the article，In his opinion，Promoting the practice of two-way anonymous peer review can reduce this type of bias in experiments。Huber also expressed similar views。He mentioned to reporters，In the case of two-way anonymity，The reviewer does not know who the author is，The author does not know who the reviewer is，This can mitigate the impact of authorship on the peer review process，Relatively simple to implement。Of course，This also depends on the specific situation。Pre-release of papers as preprints on the Internet is less common in some bet365 score fields，In these areas，Double anonymity can play a greater role，Can balance the impact of reputation on researchers。In bet365 score fields where publishing preprints online has become common practice，The effectiveness of double anonymity will be limited，But reviewers can still avoid deliberately looking for information about the author。

Huber mentioned to reporters，Their study mainly tested the one-way anonymous and two-way anonymous peer review processes，However，The evaluation of research results also involves many other methods。For example，Some researchers provide some reference guides for reviewers，To answer specific questions about the manuscript they are reviewing。In his opinion，This structured peer review should aim to help reviewers focus on the facts，Reduce the influence of other factors。Some people are exploring a more open peer review process，Allow editing、Direct communication between reviewers and authors。This approach is designed to bring all parties involved together，Discuss problems and find solutions together，To improve the results of this research。Huber thinks，Compared to the traditional one-way anonymous or two-way anonymous peer review process，The actual effect bet365 score above method is still an issue that needs to be solved，Therefore，He looks forward to further research in these directions by the academic community。