Logic intuition: experimental research and theoretical significance
November 03, 2022 08:45 Source: "Chinese Social Sciences", November 3, 2022, Issue 2522, author: Yao Zhiqiang

Logical reasoning is the core component of human rationality,is philosophy、Artificial Intelligence、Research areas that disciplines such as neuroscience and psychology。Although these disciplines explore the methods and perspectives of human logical reasoning laws,But the prerequisite for their logical reasoning of human logic is consistent,It is believed that logical reasoning is a psychological effort that requires psychological efforts、Conscious、Serized information processing process,Comparison with intuition and intuition。But,New recent studies in reasoning psychology,People have shown intuitive sensitivity to logic effectiveness in the experimental task,That is logic intuitation。This phenomenon puts forward challenges for the experimental paradigm and theoretical construction of reasoning psychology,It provides new ideas for understanding the nature of human logical reasoning ability and reasoning bias。

  Bet365 app download

Reasoning Psychology Research Method,Fitches to examine the internal information processing process and its brain mechanism of people's logical reasoning,Construct the theory to explain the psychological laws of human reasoning。In the past ten years,Researchers use different experimental paradigms to explore the processing nature of logic reasoning,Get a more consistent research conclusion,That is, people can quickly automate the logic rules or principles,Intuition sensitivity to logic validity,Researchers call it "logical intuition"。

Neys (NEYS) uses conflict perception paradigm,Requires the logic of the subject of the subject -the logic effectiveness of the conflict of faith。As a result, I found,Even if a wrong judgment is made,Test the time when the subject is more time to solve the problem of conflict,Correct self -confidence to solve problems correctly,It indicates that the conflict between logic and beliefs is hidden in the test,Explain that the subject has intuition sensitivity to logic effectiveness。Bago et al. Use two reaction bet365 best casino games paradigm research indicates,If the subject has made a correct reaction after being cautious,The first reaction they made based on intuition is usually correct,And has a high correctly correct self -confidence assessment with problems。Handley and others adopted the effects of instruction operation paradigm and the impact of conflict on logical judgments and belief judgments,As a result, I found,The impact of conflict on the accuracy of conviction judgment is greater than the effect on logical judgment,Research results support logic processing can be a hypothesis of fast automation processing。Mo Shan and others ask for a trial to determine their love of their conclusions of logical reasoning,This evaluation task does not mention logical reasoning,But the response of the subject shows sensitivity to the logical structure,The degree of love for valid conclusions is higher than the degree of love for invalid conclusions。Trippas and others requested that the subject's test conclusion to the brightness of the reasoning of reasoning,As a result, I found,The brightness of the test of the valid conclusion is higher than the evaluation of invalid conclusions。These studies find out that,When the request is required to complete the evaluation task that has nothing to do with the logical structure,,The logical effectiveness of the problem affects the evaluation performance of the subject,The automated processing of logic effectiveness interferes with conscious controlling processing tasks。HOWARTH and others use random response guidance,Require the structure or surface characteristics of the subject to ignore the reasoning problem,Random reaction to reasoning issues,Examine whether the response of the subject is affected by the logic of reasoning problems,Strict testing of logical intuition assumes。If the reaction of the subject is affected by logical effectiveness,So it must be logical validity Knowledge Automation of real estate。They found,When the subject solves simple problems,Logical effectiveness affects the random response,But there is no effect when solving complex problems。other,Hope's brain electrical research discovery,Regardless bet365 Play online games of whether the subject is based on belief or logical -based response,P3 induced by solving conflict issues are enhanced,This means that logic and belief have had an impact in the early days of reasoning,The results of this research provide Electro -Physiology evidence for logic intuition。

In short,The above studies use different experimental paradigms、Different reasoning tasks and different response indicators,Get a more consistent research conclusion,That is, logical processing can not take up work memory、Fast automation processing。

  Delicate Psychology Experimental Paradm andTheoretical construction is facing challenges

The classic experimental paradigm of reasoning psychology requires the trial on the basis of the premise that the premise is correct,Determine whether the conclusion can be launched logically。If the subject follows this guidance, complete the experimental task,So the psychological processing process they complete the reasoning task must be consciously controlled,Because this type of experimental task contains two types of core cognitive operations,That is to hypocritical thinking and target driver processing,The completion of these two types of cognitive assignments need to be paid attention to and the participation of work memory。Intuctional logic research indicates,Logical reasoning research only inspects logical reasoning activities as an analytical prudent thinking. It is incomplete,Logical reasoning intuition、Automation problem should also be an important aspect of reasoning psychology。Single sex of changing the experimental paradigm of inference,Innovation Experimental Formula,Discover multiple processing properties of logic reasoning,It is an important direction for deepening reasoning psychology research。

Psychological rules theory and psychological model theory are two early classic reasoning theories that have greater influence,Different perspectives of the cognitive processing process of logical reasoning of the two are different。Psychological rules Theory Based on grammatical orientation,The process of logical reasoning is a psychological logic rule similar to logical calculations and the specific application of its operation; psychological model theory is based on semantic orientation,It is believed that logical bet365 best casino games reasoning is a semantic knowledge construction model、The process of inspection assumptions。Although the theoretical construction orientation of these two reasoning theories is different,But all assume that logical reasoning is the consumption of cognitive resources、The control process of the series。

Dual processing theory is the new progress of reasoning psychology。This theory thinks,Human reasoning is the process of cognitive processing and processing of inspiration and analysis processing of inspiration and analytical processing。Inspirational processing has fast、Automation、Basically does not occupy the characteristics of work memory resources,Called type 1 processing; analytical processing is slow、Control processing of work memory participation,Called type 2 processing。The default interference model is a representative point of view of the theory of dual processing,This model assumes that in the process of reasoning, processed first activation,Priority to generate a default reaction,If the analytical processing does not interfere,People will eventually make the default reaction; if the analysis processing is interfered,The default reaction based on inspirational processing may be denied,and replace the reaction generated by analytical processing。Dual processing theory also assumes that logic analysis is analytical processing,Careful processing process that requires work memory。Dual processing theory thinks,People violate the logic rules、The main reason for logical errors is that there is no prudent logical analysis,Instead, an automated response is made based on startup processing,or the logic analysis is incorrect,But no matter what the reason is,All think that the correct logical reasoning needs to perform logical analysis,Structure -based logical analysis is the control processing of occupying cognitive resources。

Logic intuition phenomenon indicates,Automated processing can produce a correct response that meets logical rules,You can make the right reasoning without having to be controlled by controlling prudential thinking。Existing reasoning theory,Including the theory of dual processing,It Bet365 app download is difficult to tolerate logic intuition phenomenon,Because these theories are assumed that the correct reasoning must be the result of prudent logical analysis。Recent,Researcation Researchers for the Infuciogenic Phenomenon,Amended the existing reasoning theory from different angles。For example,The logical intuition model proposed by Neis、Three -stage dual processing model proposed by Pennycook and others to correct the existing dual processing theory。The core of these theoretical improvements is that logic processing is no longer equivalent to analytical prudential thinking,Logical processing can be controlled by control,It can also be automated processing。So,The correct reasoning response may be the result of automated intuitive processing,It may also be the result of controlling analytical processing。

  New explanation of reasoning ability and reasoning deviation

Research on reasoning psychology shows,One aspect,People’s actual reasoning process follows logic principle,Reflect that people have a certain logical reasoning ability,On the other hand,People’s reasoning shows the systemic violation of logical rules,Expressive as the deviation of belief、Matching bias and atmosphere effects such as a variety of reasoning deviations。The theoretical interpretation of the nature of logical reasoning ability and the theoretical interpretation of reasoning deviation is an important issue for reasoning psychology。

Reasoning psychology and intellectual psychology are generally considered,Logical reasoning ability is a complicated thinking ability,Involved information coding、Integrated、Converting and reaction selection and other information processing ingredients,Need to pay attention to the participation of work memory resources。This view of this kind of logical reasoning ability is the theoretical assumption of reasoning ability measurement,Ruwen graphics reasoning test。Logic intuition research indicates,People have intuition sensitivity to logical principles。Does this mean that logical reasoning ability can also be an intuition ability,or at least can be said,Logical reasoning capabilities include logical intuition ability? Research has Bet365 lotto review shown that,Different logical intuition ability of individuals in different reasoning capabilities,Smart reasoners have more accurate intuition,Not better to work hard to correct the wrong ability。There are also research indicators,There are differences in the logic of individuals in different development stages,The developmentability of the accuracy of reasoning is at least part of the result is the result of the improvement of logic intuition accuracy。Logical intuition research provides a new direction for re -understanding the nature of logical reasoning ability and the measurement of reasoning capabilities。

Why do people show system inference deviations? Inspiration and deviation theory believes,Reasoning deviation is due to people based on existing beliefs、Automation of automated processing such as stereotypes or availability of inspiration made the default reaction,This intuitional reaction has not been corrected by the prudent logical analysis。Because people are usually cognitive,So often responds based on simple inspiration,For example,If the conclusion of reasoning is true and credible,It is judged to be reasonable in reason,Expressive as the deviation of belief。Logic intuition research description,A intuitive response of automation does not necessarily cause reasoning bias,Because the intuitional reaction may be based on the deviation reaction based on inspiration analysis that is not related to the logical structure,It may also be the correct response based on logical intuition。New Study Consid by Consid by,Delivery deviation is more likely to be because the inferential conflict between the reasoning of the correct and the wrong intuition fails,instead of the results of the intuition of automation due to the result of prudent logic analysis。

Logic intuition research enriched the research theme of reasoning psychology,Promoting theoretical progress of reasoning psychology,Improving the understanding of the nature of reasoning ability and reasoning bias,It is a hot spot and cutting edge of reasoning psychology research in recent years。About logical intuition still exists in the problem that needs in -depth discussion。The first is the universal problem of logical intuition。The reasoning tasks adopted Bet365 app download by existing logical intuition research are mostly relatively simple reasoning forms,There is still controversy whether people have intuitive sensitivity to complex logic forms。Second is the problem of obtaining and development of logic intuition。Logical intuition ability is it a age feature of individual cognitive development? Can it improve the logic intuition through logic training?。Third, the current logical intuition research is limited to form logic reasoning,The logical intuition research of informal reasoning and its reasoning fallacy is yet to be carried out。

(The author is a professor at the Department of Psychology at the School of Education and Science, Liaocheng University)

Editor in charge: Changchang
QR code icon 2.jpg
Key recommendation
The latest article
Graphics
bet365 live casino games
Video

Friendship link:

Website filing number: Jinggong.com Anxie 11010502030146 Ministry of Industry and Information Technology:

All rights reserved by China Social Sciences Magazine shall not be reprinted and used without permission

General Editor Email: zzszbj@126.com This website contact information: 010-85886809 Address: 11-12, Building 1, Building 1, No. 15, Guanghua Road, Chaoyang District, Beijing: 100026