This newspaper comprehensive foreign media reporting knowledge hidden behavior is a hot issue in the current work and organizational psychological field。Many literature indicates，A person intentionally hides the knowledge requested by others，will reduce communication efficiency、Creative and productive forces，It will even damage the cohesion of the team。Similarly，If the researchers always hide the information that they have mastered，It is impossible to promote the accumulation of scientific knowledge，Then improve the cost of making breakthrough progress。Mario Gollzer, director of the Department of Social Psychology at the University of Munich, Bet365 app download Germany, and others investigated the status of scientific researchers in Europe and North American universities in 83 European and North American universities，In the recent new research published, it clarifies the social psychological factors that hinder the development of "open science" in the world。

Contemporary academic competition is becoming more and more fierce，The main manifestation in the number of thesis publications、Number of quotes、Awards、Scientific research funds and other dimensions。Golvzer said，This major environment has promoted hostile emotions between researchers，Scientific researchers share their ideas for each other、The willingness of data and data is less and less。This tendency is particularly obvious in the early professional researcher group that has not yet obtained a lifetime faculty and reputation。But，Information sharing Bet365 lotto review less、Low -transparent scientific research projects not only have not improved the efficiency of the scientific research team，And it will also lead，This is not conducive to scientific cooperation，It is not conducive to scientific progress。

Gorviz believes，In a highly competitive social environment，Researchers share their knowledge to peers，It will make yourself in an unfavorable position。So，Some people are expressing despicable、malicious、Unbelievable context clues are very vigilant。When they capture the "Meanness Cues" in the interaction with their peers，I will perform unwilling to cooperate、Suspected Heavy，It is easier to make selfish behavior such as hidden knowledge。Gorwedza attributed this feature to "sensitivity of the victim" personality。If the "sensitivity of the victim" is a risk factor for predicting to refuse cooperation Bet365 app download and selfish behavior，So activate researchers' social identity，Will the test and cooperation behavior eventually appear。

Psychological studies in the past show，People often extend their hands to the members of their group，This is because a team that belongs to a team can deepen the degree of trust between people。At the same time，People believe that team cooperation will bring greater returns，I am more willing to sacrifice personal goals in order to achieve collective goals。But，Golvzze and others found，deliberately reminded 97 experimental participants' "researchers" identity not only did not promote scientific research cooperation，In some cases, they also encouraged their suspicion of their peers，It is very likely to guide the behavior of hidden knowledge。For this，Gorviz Explanation，Emphasize the social identity of the participants "researchers"bet365 best casino games ，It means reminding them to make outstanding categories in the academic world、better than colleagues in the talent market、It's better to get better in the academic career。This has caused a hindrance self -steress impression to researchers，That is, the real researchers are ambitious、Indifferent people。Final，Researchers are forced to adapt to a researcher’s "ideal image"，and therefore change understanding and action。

Reducing the hidden behavior of knowledge is not to be completed overnight，Gorviz believes，It should take the initiative to break the stereotype of researchers，Encourage mutual trust，Form a good atmosphere for sharing scientific knowledge。Researchers represent a social identity of knowledge sharing rather than hidden knowledge，Need to have the spirit of cooperation，This can help the development of "open science"。

(Liu Yuwei/Compilation)