Leio Strauss and its school's political philosophy thoughts were introduced in China，Causes greater response and research enthusiasm。but but，Different scholars' understanding and evaluation of the political philosophy of the school have fundamental differences。The political philosophy of the Strauss School and the study of the history of Western political philosophy。From the perspective of methodology，Study in the history of political philosophy in Straus, although it has confusing uniqueness and deep face，But innerly contains fundamental methodological errors。

The research method of political philosophy from Strauss School mainly includes the overall interpretation framework of "white/hidden text reading method" and "ancient and modern dispute"。The former is also the unique "logo" of the study of the history of the political philosophy of Strauss School。According to Steraus，Political philosophers can all be proficient in writing skills，They will use two languages ​​to convey information to readers in the same text。A language is a whitening presence of the general public，Anyone can master the basic meaning by reading; another language is to bypass the people's political hostility to the philosopher, and deliberately use the hidden rhetoric to make a hidden micro -teaching to a small number of people。This hidden micro -teaching can show the part of the truth as the truth to a minority elite，Fully take care of the value concept that the political society is maintained。Only those well -trained "internal lines" can be seen after a long chewing text。From the opinion of Strauss，"Political Philosophy" mainly involves a research theme，but a way of disposal，The political treatment of philosophy。Philosophy is a subversive business that replaces "opinions" with "truth"，But the stability of the political society is exactly based on "opinion"，"Opinions" as an indispensable matrix concentration of political society is reflected as moral、Religion and Law。Philosophy without restraint value neutralized intellectual exploration inevitably breaks through the limit of morality and religion，Differentiated to disintegrate the people's moral beliefs and religious beliefs，And this destructive activity will definitely arouse the hostility of the people，Make the philosopher a "public enemy of the whole people"。So，The relationship Bet365 lotto review between the philosopher and the people is essentially conflict and confrontation。Philosophy not only needs to defore its own existence at the trial site of the political community，And it is necessary to find all，Inconsciously self -standard，Disputes between philosophy and politics。Strauss's political philosophy claim is actually the philosophy of politics，Set politics as a philosophical "compass"，and discuss the philosophy of "never restlessly" and block in the political field。

The author believes that the "white/hidden text reading method" of Strauss and his school has the following defects: first，This unique text reading method lacks common applicability，Can't be promoted to a strict sense of philosophical history research methodology。Can't be promoted to a strict sense of philosophical history research methodology，"sampling" of philosophical text is not random，but targeted。When he confirms his conclusion, he only uses the text that he has screened as an example.，instead of fully considered the key text evidence that the vast major。The proposal of his "white/hidden text reading method"，It is completely based on Plato、"Case Study" by political philosophers such as Farabi，Based on incomplete induction based on the preference，Therefore, the study conclusion is destined to be very different from the actual political philosophy and ideological history of political philosophy。2，Steraus is keen to divide readers into strict differentiation camps of "wisdom and foolishness"，This rigid and arbitrary two -point method faces two difficulties: on the one hand，The theoretical basis of "Two -point Method" is difficult to establish，Violation of the ideological purpose of the classic writer himself。Facing the so -called "two -point method" of Steraus，Attentive readers can't help but have doubts，This distinction is the ideological character shared by the historical political philosophy text as a research object，Still the label that Steraus is convenient for the author's theoretical preconception to the authors? Open the classic political philosophy in history at will，It is not difficult to find，Answer Trees to the latter。Actually，Most of the classic writers have never consciously adopted the "personality split" expression，The starting point of their thinking about political philosophy issues are not the first to make wisdom and stupidity of the reader group，Instead of justice such as justice、virtue、Obligation and other fundamental political philosophy issues。If the difference Bet365 lotto review between the philosopher and the people does not exist in the Bet365 app download author，So there is no special writing skills to convey the teachings and hidden micro -education at the same time。This is the case，Steraus's "white/hidden text reading method" on the basis will not attack self -break。On the other hand，"Two -point method" is seriously inconsistent with experience and facts，Steraus seriously despise the continuity of transition from low -level wisdom to high -level wisdom。Actually，The wisdom distribution of a person is not the difference in type，but a gradient color difference similar to the color spectrum，Even the ideal elites of wisdom can not guarantee errors。As the saying goes，"Wise Thousands of Find，There must be a loss "" three stinky leather artisans through Zhuge Liang "" Three people，There must be my teacher "and so on，These motto shows that there is no insurmountable gap between wisdom and stupidity。Even if we admit that Steraus’s simple dictators，It is impossible to ensure that the people or fools receive the author's white teachings，And the philosopher receives the thought signal of the author's hidden teachings，There is a certain information asymmetry between the communication between the reader and the authored author，It is possible that "the speaker has no intention of the listener intention"，The author's unintentional words passed through the over -explanation of the reader's over -explanation.。A key preset of Strauss's hidden micro -reading is，Readers assume that they can accurately identify the author’s hidden education，and further determine that the hidden micro teachings he recognized is the authors of the author's true wishes when pretending to be in dangerous views。But，This preset is difficult to establish。third，Strauss's political philosophy history research method does not have "evidence of pseudo"。Since the primary virtue of the study of political philosophy history is to objectively reproduce the ideas of political philosophers in history，Then the text of a political philosopher is of course the objective standard of measurement of research value，Evaluate the quality of the history of political philosophy，The direct method is to return to the author’s text，View whether there is a text basis。But，Strauss's hidden micro -reading method has the elastic effect of "left and right"，When the interpreter's point of view is based on it, it can be checked，You can generously acknowledge the author’s white teachings，When the interpreter's point of view and classic text are different，The interpreter can claim that the author is writing，bet365 Play online games The final logic result is that no matter how the interpreter explains, it can be "not overwhelming from the heart"。That is to say，Hidden micro -reading lacks an objective reference standard，It becomes an interpreter for exempting words，Normal communication between the author and the reader into a "Guess" game for playing tricks。I think，The text of a political philosopher is released，It should be used as a "public instrument" for the interpreter of the world to launch a rational communication dialogue，With the free disclosure of text information，During the collision of criticism and defense，The continuous thought spark may be clear and seemingly unclear。Fourth，The hidden micro -reading rendered by Strauss makes some ideological elites directly experience the hidden pleasure of being a political philosopher，Promise to this hidden pleasure，Indeed, a group of researchers who are loyal to exploration。In this decryption experience，The interpreter imagines himself as the protagonist in the narrative of political writers，Taste "Role Exchange" like "Festive Butterfly"，However, this psychological experiential mysterious "sense of substitution" has exceeded the scope that can be grasped by academic research and rational discussion。

Study the history of Western political philosophy under the framework of the "dispute between ancient and modern"，"Logic" of the evolution of the history of Western political philosophy in combing，It is another main way to study the study of the history of political philosophy in Strauss。Strauss thinks，Plato's political philosophy is a glorious model of political philosophy。Since then，The logic of the evolution of the history of the entire Western political philosophy becomes a cover of this highest ideological form、Forgotten and betrayal。Especially in modern times，With the promotion of "three waves of modernity"，Modern philosophers have gradually ignored the expensiveness of ancient political philosophers to human nature、Zhi Yu's Division，As a result, modern politics completely forgotten the double teachings of ancient philosophers，completely deviated from the high specification requirements of Plato's political philosophy，Therefore, modern politics is out of control to slums and slumped，This backstur is mainly reflected in the technicalization of politics and the technicalization of politics。Strauss thinks，To avoid modern political philosophy rivers and rivers，It is necessary to return to ancient political philosophy，Listen to Plato's hidden micro teachings。

The overall theoretical graphic of the ancient Bet365 lotto review and modern disputes of Steraus，The author believes that his argument has the following problems: First of all，"Solution on the History of the Generation"。Steraus regards the entire history of modern political philosophy as a forgetful history of Plato's taught，A history of a political philosophy，This view is hard to say that it is serious、affordable to withstand。Actually，Strauss attempts to erode the "history" in the historical sense of political philosophy in the "history" of its own political philosophy。Under the refraction of the "prism" of the overall framework of the ancient and modern dispute，The reader does not see the view of the history of political philosophy，Instead, it is highly distorted with the "image" of Strauss's political philosophy of political philosophy，This distorted history of political philosophy in turn in turn has become Steraus's political philosophy of the political philosophy。Next，Double standards。Strauss discussed the bright side of ancient politics，Avoid the negative aspects of ancient political society; almost all negative evaluations when discussing modern politics。This reflects its dual evaluation standards，means "innocent positive" on ancient politics，Adopt "Confliction" for modern politics，This criteria for judging "virtue" are too one -sided，Can't objectively reflect the overall development of the history of political philosophy。Comparison of comparison，Oak Shaint's understanding of the history of political philosophy is more reasonable，Political philosophers in the history of philosophy are pessimistic about people's political life，I believe that people’s political life is rather to be a continuous dilemma，The entanglement of political order and permanent dilemma is，Order can relieve difficulties。The masterpiece of each political philosophy is an innovative response to the dilemma of the times，The overall or unity of the history of political philosophy is reflected in it is an attempt to answer for human forever in different aspects of human dilemma。Plato is concerned about how to overcome the dilemma of the Democratic system of Athens; Hobbes tried to respond to the dilemma of natural state with absolute sovereignty; Rols' "justice theory" tried to answer the theory of moral science that could not be accepted、The era of conflict between religious beliefs，How can a fair and stable good -order society possible。Finding political order in the permanent dilemma of human beings is the theme of the history of political philosophy。again，"Olympia" interpretation。Analysis philosopher Martinic bet365 live casino games pointed out，Steraus's interpretation of the history of Western political philosophy is actually Olympian。Strauss with the eyes of the God of Political Philosophers from a high place with the eyes of the gods on the Olympus Mountain，In order to meet the requirements of the grand ideological graphics he confirmed，He selectively adjusts some details，Replace it、Tampered with or even canceled another detail。If we regard the entire history of Western political philosophy as a difficult long sentence，Steraus's "sentence reading" method First of all, not where is not to "break sentences" to clarify the logical association and ideological structure of the history of political philosophy，Instead of where to "disconnect" can better show the break of ancient and modern political thinking landscapes。Strauss has been asking about the disaster of modern political philosophy for a lifetime，and treat it as the target of attack，to achieve the purpose of reaching ancient times to criticize modernity。This is why he sometimes thinks that Hobbes is the founder of modern political philosophy，Sometimes the reason why Makiaweli is pushed to the founder of modern political philosophy。Strauss is more concerned about，Which writer "new moral attitude" can support his grand theoretical framework of "ancient and modern dispute"。Strauss annihilated the author's voice in the "Olympia" interpretation of the grand narrative，The direct consequence of the generated is，It can easily cause unnecessary distortion of political philosophers。Through this interpretation，We are not obtained by the ideological philosopher's own thought retelling or conversion，Instead, the dedication of the wishful thinking of Strauss prefix。Last，"Anachronisms"。Straus has claimed to have discovered the lesion of modern political degeneration，Inference according to common sense，He should have a pitch of spiritual sanxi，However, the prescription he prescribed was "the way of ancient times to the present"，Return to Plato's political philosophy。I have to say，Facing today's complex realistic political situation，Strauss stood in ancient politics with the "Plato -style political philosophy" prescription for the "sinking" of modern politics.。This method of re -practicing ancient political ethics for modernity is not so much "diagnosis and treatment"，Maybe it is to avoid。

To sum up，Study in the history of Western political philosophy in Straus School is actually an objective study of the history of political philosophy with a unique position of political philosophy，This strategy not only completely deviates from the "objective reproduction" purpose of the history of political philosophy，Difficult to escape the Bet365 lotto review suspicion of "recycling interoperability"。That is to say，The Strauss School has regarded its unique political philosophy as the "work hypothesis" in the study of the history of political philosophy，It also regards its political philosophy as the final destination of the history of political philosophy。This kind of "historical theory interoperability" interoperability、The practice of mutual explanation actually canceled the independent significance of the research of political philosophy history，Sutlled the subjective arbitrary independence of the "Six Classics" style。If he completely copies his research routine of the history of political philosophy，So a series of research on political philosophy history will become the "foot note" of Strauss's political philosophy of political philosophy，Fully lost its objective research value。The research method of political philosophy from the Strauss School is involved in the involvement of the attitude，A "objective understanding" text attitude。

　　bet365 Play online games

(Author Unit: School of Philosophy of Shaanxi Normal University)