Early spring this year，Teacher He Cuixiang, the History Research Office of the Institute of Philosophy of the Institute of Philosophy of the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences，They have a reading class，Read Hegel's "Little Logic"，I hope I can talk about。I am glad to accept。The History of the History of Marxist Philosophy was the academic brother Wu Yuanliang stayed during his lifetime、Ren Director's Laboratory。The Institute of Philosophy always supports，After leaving the Institute of Philosophy，I have always been like this。

Mr. He Lin translated "Little Logic"，The original concept of its core concept was translated as "having"，After translation of translation as "existence"，Sometimes both use。Mr. Yang Yizhi translated "Logic" (that is, "Large Logic" usually referred to)，Translate Sein as "Yes"。Mr. Liang Cunxiu translated "Small Logic" (the title is translated as "Logic · Philosophy, the First Part 1")，Breakly follow Mr. He's tradition，Use the translation of "existence"。After that，Mr. Xue Hua translated "Outline of the Complete Book of Philosophy and Science" (the first part is "Logic"，"Small Logic")，The word "existence" is also used。From "Yes" to "Existence"，Then to "Yes"，Last fixation in "Existence"，Reflects the research and understanding of Hegel's research and understanding of several generations of scholars in my country，and understanding and understanding of the core concept of Western philosophy。

I read Hegel's "Little Logic"，But more read "Logic"。I think，Compared to "Logic"，"Small Logic" has developed some parts，But the most basic idea is consistent，Especially Bet365 app download the understanding of Sein is the same。"Logic" about Sein's exposition is more detailed，Including its system and specific content。Therefore，Understand Hegel's thought，Especially from the perspective of studying Hegel，First of all, I still have to read "Logic"。Read "Logic"，First of all, read his three initial concepts。I think，Translating Hegel's Sein as "existence" is a mistake translation，It should be translated to "yes"，Understand it in the sense of words，This can understand Hegel。So，I use "Logic" as a blueprint，Focus on the three initial concepts of Hegel, "Yes", "No" and "Change"，and his related discussion。

The lecture response is good，The discussion is very enthusiastic，It is also very interesting。Most questions are concentrated in Hegel's "yes"，Still "existence"。During the discussion process，I said that Hegel finds the concept of departure from logic，Therefore, the Sein he said can only be "yes" (and "no")，Not "existence" (and "none")。There are two main opposition: one，The beginning of the logic of Hegel，Therefore, what he said is "existence"。Its two，"Existence" is the most abstract concept，Therefore, it is directly、No specified，So is the concept of departure。

The first opposition obviously involved the understanding of logic。Hegel's book is "Logic"，Of course, with his own ideas and understanding，Including his want to transform logic，Or want to establish his philosophical system on the basis of logic。But no matter what，At least two points are very clear。One，Hegel explicitly said: "The beginning is logic。"" This is the explanation，Be sure to consider logic，Even you can only consider logic。Its two，Hegel must know what the logic is -this can only be the logic since Aristotle。bet365 best casino games That is to say，Hegel cannot put aside the existing logic and start another stove。So，Starting from logic, consider Aristotle logic and traditional logic formed by it，Considering what the theory (or thing this is like)。The basic sentence of traditional logic is "S is P"，If you add quantifiers and negative words，"All S is P", "All S is not P", "There is a P" and "S not to P"，Then they construct the theory of three paragraphs。If you add a single proposition，then there can be propositions such as "A is P" and "A is not P"。Start from this theory，I can’t find the "existence" (none of the "none")，can only find "Yes" and "No"，And this is also the "quality" as the "quality" in the logical theory，The "qualitative" of one of the three categories of Hegel can correspond to it，The "word word" he said in the discussion also corresponds to it。

This opposition seems to have a layer of meaning: the logic that Hegel said is the beginning of the logic (I think this understanding is wrong)。In this way, you need to explain two questions，What is the thing before logic，What does it mean? The other is even if there is such a thing，Why is it "existence"? And more importantly,，Be sure to take out text evidence，This illustrates this is Hegel's understanding and discussion。One sentence，Only imagination is not possible。Due to time relationship，I didn’t start discussions in the lecture。Actually，This involves understanding of the relationship between logic and philosophy。In ancient Greece，When people initially conduct philosophical discussions，The logic does not produce。"What" is the basic way for people to discuss problems，It is a way to ask questions，It is also the way to answer and explain to。It is in related discussions，bet365 best casino games People have produced logic and recognition，and theoreticalization of these cognitions，Finally established a logical discipline。People involve logical problems in discussion，Discussion on the theory and method of applying logic with people，​​The two are fundamental different。Just like a person does not understand logic，It does not mean that he has no logic when he talks，It will not involve logic problems，Not to mention that he will violate logic。

The second opposition seems to be a understanding of the word "existence" in Chinese，In fact, it also involves understanding Hegel。In Chinese，The word "exist" is rarely used，Only "existing something" and "something exist"，And it means very clear，Similar to "Yes"。So，This word itself is a verb，It has a clear meaning; in the medieval words，It is a category word，It has meaning。So，It does not conform to the characteristics of Hegel，If directability、Unsurprising。especially，It does not conform to the description of the lines。In a sentence，For example, in "S is P"，"Yes" is meaningful，Because it connects S and P，or，P make a stipulation to it。This gives it a content related to P，Therefore, there is a content that is not related to other things such as Q。but，Draw out "yes" from the sentence，It leaves the sentence，It is no longer a word，It has no meaning，Because it loses the specified，This is what Hegel calls "pure (concentrated) is"。

，There are two related concepts in Hegel's works。One is dasein。The academic community discusses the DA of them a lot，I think this is an unacceptable。The key is still "yin"。It can be seen literally，This is a word composed of DA and Sein，Is the noun form of IST DA，Literal means: Where is it。Because bet365 Play online games there are DA，Dasein meaning more，to help discuss Sein。Hegel said clearly，DA has no space here，Obviously, it means that the meaning of Sein is explained by its constitution。This is here，The logic of "S is P" is considered，Immediately highlight it。Limited to time，I just mentioned this in the discussion，No expansion。Another related concept is Existenz (existence)，Hegel has a special discussion about it。This is in Western philosophy，Especially a concept that produces and clarified in discussions related to Being。Kant explicitly discuss the difference between it and Sein，The same is true of Hegel。The academic community translates it as "actual deposit" and "survival"，For the difference with "existence"。This is actually a little troublesome，As a result, the relevant discussions of Hegel and some of the differences that had been made are also greatly blurred，I can't even see it。To avoid discussing complexification，I didn't talk about this concept in the lecture。

Some other oppositions are also proposed in the lecture，For example, the "existence" that makes Hegel later said, including dialectics，It seems easier to understand some。I don’t think so。Hegel starts from "yes"，Think it is a pure concept，Once it has regulations (such as Dasein，Another situation like "S is P")，A negation of "yes"，It is no longer pure、If it is not specified。Once it is explained that it is like this，It means that it is not that，So it itself has negative。Of course, you can discuss such problems，But from the translation given from the lecture，The main content I talked about，So I just click until the end。I still emphasize the understanding of "yes" in the discussion。This is the concept of Hegel's departure。In my bet365 Play online games opinion，The concept of departure is wrong，The things behind can only become more and more outrageous。other，I am talking about the concepts of Hegel's "yes", "no" and "change"，Discussion should be concentrated here。That is to say，It should be concentrated in these words to discuss exactly what he said is "yes"，Or "existence"。Support to explain the current text，Not available，But what I used is also needed and can be discussed by text。In a relatively limited discussion scope and space，I think it's best not to go too far。Usually like this，I always focus on the text discussed，Critics always want to jump out of the current text，Quoting more things。

Extended one step，My discussion on Being has been many years，Cited text is already very much，But I rarely see the critics quoted these texts and my discussions on my specific discussion。You can always see and hear always talk about "‘ one is how the theory '"," ‘‘ what is the word'。This discussion，Visible saying，No "Step on the point"。Someone said in person，Even if you quote 1000 paragraphs, "Yes"，This is also inductive，I can't explain "one is to the end"。This is the same as the summary in the discussion to discuss other things.，The essence is the same。

I obviously feel，Opposition has a commonality，That is to understand what Hegel said based on the existing knowledge structure。Because this knowledge structure is established by reading the word "existence"，Therefore, "existence" will resonate in reading，I think of understanding。Even if there is confusion，I will do my best to understand，To persuade yourself。But this one to do my best is to mobilize the storage in your knowledge structure。Fake time，If you add something in the process of establishing Bet365 lotto review a knowledge structure，The theory of logic，The results may be different。

I know I studied metaphysics，It is a minority in the academic community。I still know，metaphysics research in the domestic academic community is not valued。So，Mr. He asked me to give a lecture at the Institute of Philosophy，I am happy in my heart: People who study Marxist philosophy organize the reading class of Hegel logic，This is undoubtedly an academic progress。Communication together，Especially seeing the young face，I feel again: The world is in the final analysis that they are (they).。

(Author Unit: School of Philosophy of Zhengzhou University)