bet365 live casino games Judicial review of cases of non -administrative responsibilities，There is a lot of controversy in theory and practice。The construction of the chain of the judicial review system chain of administration is not of great significance to promote the construction of administrative rule of law。In terms of judgment of statutory responsibilities，Except for law、Regulations and regulations are clearly clear about the scope of the administrative organs，Normal file、"Three Regulations" is the basis for the judgment of "legal duties"，Predictive behavior、Administrative Promise、Administrative Agreement、List of power and responsibility is not the basis for judging，The minutes of the meeting can only be used as a supplementary judgment basis for legal duties。Administrative duties that can be sued for performance，It must be clearly clear for responsibilities、A series of conditions such as actual performance effect。According to the form of expression，No performance can be divided into clear rejection performance、Three types of idleness and failure to fully fulfill。Different types of failure to perform，The judicial organs shall take different judicial review standards。If the judicial organs determine that the administrative organs have unforgettable legal duties and the defense of the administrative organs in the form of satisfaction，The judicial organs also respond to the defense of the administrative organs for substantive review。

　Keywords:Administrative Responsibility Responsibilities Perform Judicial Censors

　　AuthorWang Qingbin，Professor of the Institute of Rule of Law of the University of Political Science and Law (Beijing 100088)。