With the popularity of 5G technology and the continuous increase of support policies for support，bet365 Play online games Bet365 lotto review artificial intelligence gradually enters the streets of ordinary people from the "national strategic height"。"Beatles style" song created by artificial intelligence、Autonomous cars on the road、"Sophia" that obtains citizenship "Sophia" and other phenomena that can only be seen in movies all declare the coming of the "era of artificial intelligence"。Laws are often used to responding to new technologies with relatively lagging responses，But with the rapid development of artificial intelligence，The judicial field seems to make forward -looking changes，For example, the new artificial intelligence clerk and voice court trial。

　　bet365 live casino games

Judicial purpose is the value orientation of judicial activities，If judicial activities lack value orientation，Then the law that can only stay on paper，The reform of the again optimized judicial system may also be in vain。"Let the people feel fairness and justice in every judicial case" is the goal of my country's judicial organs at present，The process of exercising judicial power is the process of playing with each other in various factors，Fairness and justice judicial judgment is the value judgment made by the judges to balance the interests of all parties。In big data、bet365 Play online games Bet365 lotto review artificial intelligence、The algorithm is increasingly used today，We have always had a wrong understanding of artificial intelligence: artificial intelligence is fair decision maker。This fallacy ignores:

First，"Fair、Justice "The social value of human beings can be digitized or data? Fair and fair realization is not 1+1 = 2，Now，No algorithm or theory can prove that bet365 Play online games Bet365 lotto review artificial intelligence can "fair、Justice "digitalization of value concept，The judicial purpose of the lack of core values ​​is not the real judicial purpose，It will inevitably cause torture of the legitimacy of the judicial itself。For example, in traditional criminal trials，The judgment made by the judge not only requires the application of legal provisions，It also needs to be combined with the mood of the victim、Social effect，The suspect recognizes the attitude，Is there any possibility of criminals and other comprehensive evaluations。The process of this argumentation is the process of achieving fairness and fairness，Among them, it contains complex value concepts，Artificial intelligence can data data such as the evidence involved in the case，But it is difficult to put the social effect、Emotional factors such as dataization。Second，Artificial intelligence is designed and built by technicians，Whether the designer or the builder can fully understand the relatively professional legal knowledge，Unrelated will be completely written with legal content or moral rules。For example, the judge understands the defendant's unintentional smile as a crime of sincerity，and the technicians may not understand。third，Whether artificial intelligence or strong artificial intelligence will agree with "fairness、Justice "This value system。Now，What we lack is not only to determine whether artificial intelligence can comply with the way of existing legal policies，More lack of inspection of whether artificial intelligence can identify with our value system。Another，We must clearly understand the basis of data as artificial intelligence，It still has defects objectively，The authenticity of the data source、The source is not wide enough、Poor data protection and other problems，We cannot "fair、Justice "and other core values ​​are realized to this" defective "artificial intelligence，You cannot give it to the "perfect" artificial intelligence that may conflict with our values。

　　Applicable artificial intelligence ≠ is conducive to judicial decisions

"Judicial Responsibility System" reform is the core task of current judicial reform，"Who handles the case，Who decides，Who is responsible "not only reflects the" decentralization "of judicial decision -making，It also reflects the "control" of judicial supervision。Judicial decision -making is not subject to supervision as "abuse of power"，Judicial personnel should make judicial decisions and bear the corresponding responsibilities within the scope of supervision，Otherwise, it will not only violate the purpose of my country's judicial reform，It's not conducive to "fairness、Justice "purpose to achieve。Therefore，bet365 Play online games Bet365 lotto review artificial intelligence is suitable for the efficiency of judicial decision -making、Accurate，It must also be conducive to being disclosed and supervised，Absence of one indispensable。It is undeniable that，The current "artificial intelligence" is suitable for the judicial field. It can indeed facilitate the people、Improve judicial efficiency，But in the process of judicial decision -making, there are problems that cannot be ignored。

bet365 Play online games Bet365 lotto review artificial intelligence is suitable for judicial decision -making generally two ways: First, artificial intelligence makes judicial decisions directly。In the future, strong artificial intelligence first breaks down the judicial decision -making process into data，Analyze and make a decision，Finally, it will be decided to give data execution。According to the current artificial intelligence theory，This special "algorithm" must be "black box operation"，People have no way of knowing how artificial intelligence makes decisions。Artificial intelligence itself can't tell，The company that develops it has no way to know，Even if the development company has a trace to follow，It is also likely to refuse "public" for "business secrets"。Not to mention justice is not like playing chess，bet365 live casino games If you lose a chess, you can come again，Judicial mistakes may be confused when social order may appear。Therefore，No matter what extent artificial intelligence develops to，None of the judicial power can be all over the artificial intelligence independent decision。Second, artificial intelligence belongs to auxiliary tools，Judicial decision -making is still made by judicial officers。Under this way，Artificial intelligence mostly appears in the auxiliary mode of "risk assessment"，Risk assessment of every judicial decision of judicial officers。

The disadvantages of this mode are reflected in: first，The boundary of "Auxiliary" is difficult to clarify。Judicial personnel are easily affected by factors outside many laws when making judicial decisions，One of the purpose of judicial reform is to remove or reduce as politics、Social and other factors。Judicial decision -making adds "risk assessment" but increased the interference factors。If a "unreasonable" decision appears, it will not be able to find out that judicial personnel are decisions based on their own reasons，Still adopting the opinions of bet365 Play online games Bet365 lotto review artificial intelligence to reduce your responsibility，or the decision made by the decision -making behavior based on artificial intelligence，This vague boundary is easy to cause the limit of responsibility to unclear，It makes it difficult for the accountability procedure to start。Second，Artificial intelligence is prone to "error" evaluation。Regardless of the data source incomplete，still algorithm black box cannot be disclosed，The risk assessment made by artificial intelligence will never have a 100 % correct rate。For judicial officers，Even if artificial intelligence is only one -hundredth of the chance of error，We should not think of it as "objective standard"。For example, in the field of criminal rules，In the future, artificial intelligence may directly judge the risk of criminal crime based on the external characteristics of the perpetrator，It is recommended bet365 Play online games that the judicial organs convict and sentence for it，Does the judicial organs agree with this auxiliary or guidance，Is it a martyr who became the theory of modern "natural criminals"? third，Lack of corrective mechanisms。One of the purpose of judicial decision -making to use artificial intelligence is to ensure that judicial personnel make the right decision，Reduce the case of unjust, false and false，Ensure that every behavior that appears in these decisions can be subject to some kind of supervision。but，If the judiciary、The person involved in the case is dissatisfied with the "decision" of artificial intelligence，Can it be reviewed? Or if you cannot review，Can it be corrected in time? Conditioning a opaque black box algorithm may not get a fair result，But the judicial decision that lacks a correction mechanism will definitely get an unfairness、Resultive results。

With the development of technology，bet365 Play online games Bet365 lotto review artificial intelligence technology will definitely improve，The above disadvantages may be resolved in the future，But if you do not pay attention to the actual needs of the judiciary，and only based on the principle of "technical priority"，Let the artificial intelligence be left and right、Leading judicial reform may not get a satisfactory result。

　　Artificial intelligence can only be applicable to some judicial links

bet365 Play online games Bet365 lotto review artificial intelligence suitable for the most ideal state of the judicial field is to be highly consistent with the judicial progress，Artificial intelligence is both conducive to the purpose of judicial realization of fairness and fairness，Can continue to improve judicial efficiency，Discover judicial issues and improve timely。But due to the special nature of the judicialness and the natural disadvantages of artificial intelligence in the judicial field，The judicial organs must know that not all links can use artificial intelligence。To weaken the negative effect of artificial intelligence，Bet365 app download Give full play to its positive effect，The simplest、The most direct way is to apply it to the most unsatisfactory in justice、quantifiable、Low -efficiency link，For example, the input and output of manual data input、Repeated labor and other links。Because it is highly consistent in order to maintain high degree of judicial progress，Artificial intelligence itself also needs to continue to learn and develop，Once quantified、The low -efficiency link noticed that artificial intelligence behavior does not meet the judicial requirements or purposes，When there is no mature error correction system，The institutionality of the judicial itself will also prevent its negative effects from further expanding。Another reason to limit it in this type of link is to help the judicial authorities regularly summarize the problem，Optimized follow -up improvement。Artificial intelligence can keenly discover the details of judicial activities，Regular summary of judicial organs，Put forward a specific and feasible optimization solution at any time，Then reduce the cost of reform to promote the science of judicial activities、Systematic improvement。

To sum up，Judicial conservative is not "technical closed"， The combination of judicial and bet365 Play online games Bet365 lotto review artificial intelligence is an inevitable trend，But at the same time, we must also realize that artificial intelligence developed based on the development of human cognitive processes, no matter what extent develops to，It has natural limitations in the judicial field。The construction of "rule of law China" is the main method of judicialness as the main means of social management，Therefore, the application of any reform method or new technology should be based on the laws of judicial laws。Leading "Justice"，Advocating "Judicial+Artificial Intelligence" is an appropriate choice，On the contrary，Lead artificial intelligence，"Artificial Intelligence+Justice" is a choice of hidden Bet365 lotto review risks，Clarifying this "addition" order can maximize the negative effects of artificial intelligence，can the additional method of justice and artificial intelligence be right、Multiple。

　　(Author Unit: Law School of Heilongjiang University)