2021 The "Opinions on Strengthening the Governance of Source Governance to Promote Contradictions and Disputes from the source" adopted by the Central Committee of the Central Committee in 2021 pointed out，Make full use of big data、Artificial Intelligence、Blockchain and other information means，Strengthening the construction of a diversified resolution platform for online contradictions and disputes，Improve judicial big data analysis application ability，Push the work data of the source of the source of complaints、visualization。In the background of the new era，Continuous deepening the court's villain governance digital transformation、Promoting the construction of the source of the stem and Zhizhi，For the timely preventing and resolving social contradictions and disputes、Maintaining social stability is of great significance。

　　bet365 best casino games First，At the source prevention level，From the trial management of the case to the precise decision of judicial big data。Traditionally，Case trial management data of the court is usually used to measure the quality and efficiency of judges' trials，and refine and summarize the data through manually to discover problems in social governance，Then make a corresponding judicial advice。But，With the in -depth advancement of the construction of the smart court and the construction of the entire digital court，Judicial management forms are becoming more electronic and digital，Big data technology in -depth application is the court accurately analyzed the contradiction and dispute involved in the case、Development、evolution and its characteristics provides possible。For example，The court uses judicial big data to cause the cause of common case types、Intelligent calculation and analysis of the process and evolution characteristics，Form a visual trend chart and analysis report，This provides decision -making reference for issuing more accurate judicial suggestions，Therefore, to prevent and resolve potential social contradictions and disputes in different regions and different industries at the source。

Next，At the level of diversified solution，From offline "Maple Bridge Experience" to the gathering of online diversified resource solution resources。Digital technology gathers multiple resource solutions for the court、Multiple resolution of promoting contradictions and disputes provides convenient conditions，To a certain extent, it breaks through the dilemma of the decentralization of diversified resource resolution resources in the past。It can effectively integrate multiple resource solution resources through the digital platform，Solve information asymmetric problem、Quickly convergence of solution to the resolution，Let the parties resolve conflicts without leaving home。For example，Traffic accident、Contradictions and disputes in industry fields such as financial securities and other industries require relevant government departments、Industry Association Organization、mediation organization and other solution forces participating together，Due to strong professionalism、A single involved in the department，So the parties in practice based on common governance needs，Easy to break data barriers、Data sharing。In recent years，Some regional courts adapt to local conditions，Multiple resolution to promote the industry's contradictions and disputes，Established a professional court、Established a digital integrated processing platform，Construction of "Court+Traffic Police", "Court+Industry and bet365 Play online games Commerce Federation" and other multiple solution platforms，Effectively resolved many industry contradictions and disputes，Avoid the evolution and upgrading of contradictions and disputes and the occurrence of derivative cases。

Last，The control level at the gate，From offline physical trial venues to judicial service function line extension and expansion。With the in -depth advancement of the construction of the smart court，The court's function is also extended online，To a certain extent, it solves the problem that some people are difficult to contact with judicial justice。For example，With the mobile micro Court、"Sharing Court" and other digital platform promotion and use，Its function is not limited to judicial judgments to conflict disputes，It is also manifested in actively extend legal consultation through these digital platforms、Dispute evaluation、Disputes and other functions。The court is not only a physical place that symbolizes justice，With the support of digital technology, it has also become a judicial service agency。The parties can enjoy online consultation after logging in to the platform for identity certification、Online evaluation、Online mediation、Case push and online judicial confirmation of judicial services。In this process，The court gives full play to the automatic push of digital technology in the case、Decision and evaluation advantages in the risk assessment of litigation，Pre -complaints of contradictions and disputes "control"，Effective diversion of a batch of cases，To a certain extent, it relieves the pressure of the court's case handling。

　　In terms of reality,First, the source data sharing is not enough，Data Island still exists。Digital transformation of the court's sources of complaints is an important content of deepening social governance in the new era，But social governance involves all aspects，Need different organizations、Department、Individual collaborative participation，Especially in the process of digital transformation of the source of the source of the source of the source of the source of the source of the source of the source of the source data sharing，can really form a synergy of solution to the resolution。but，The current court's complaint governance digital transformation practice still faces data island problems。This manifestation is，Government departments have not presented in a comprehensive governance platform in the process of social governance.，Department data barriers still exist。To resolve contradictions and disputes from the source，The data of multiple departments must be integrated。But currently，Except for a few regional courts co -ordination at the provincial level，Courts of court judicial data in most regions have not completely shared with other departments' data，This makes it difficult for the digital empowerment court to have the maximum effectiveness。

Second, the traditional ritual culture of face -to -face debate in the process of solving income has not fundamentally changed。In traditional concepts，The court is a rational、Represents national authority、A place of resolving fairness and justice，But this French cultural concept ecludes the use of the digital platform of the source governance to a certain extent。Although compared to the traditional conventional case handling process，Online judicial technology platform optimizes the allocation of judicial resources，But from the people's concept of traditional justice on law and even judicialness，The people's trust and justice of judicial justice cannot be completely refracted to the digital resolution platform。When contradictions and disputes occur，Some grass -roots people are still willing to coordinate disputes in offline physical spaces in person。

Third, there is still a certain tension between digital technology supply and the actual needs of Bet365 lotto review court complaints.。In practice，The court uses the online multi -solution platform to solve the platform. It is usually clear that the facts are clear、Prevention and resolution of parts of non -controversial civil and commercial contradictions and disputes，And some of the contradictions and disputes cannot be fully used to mediate before the online multiple solution platform，For example, disputes in intellectual property rights，still need to be tried in person。，Contradictions and disputes that occur in the grassroots urban and rural communities，Often involved face -to -face emotional communication and relationship restoration，and because the digital literacy of some groups is relatively low，As a result。For example, pre -mediation of old disputes，Many elderly people cannot accurately use the intelligent technology platform，At this time, the flexibility of the judge's selectivity application of online multiple solution platform is relatively large。

　From the perspective of future development,One aspect，Remove data barriers，Great judicial concept of strengthening digital technology -driven。Source governance is the court's practice of source governance in the social governance of the new era、Governance according to law、System governance、Innovative practice of comprehensive governance，In this process，The court's complaint governance implements the big judicial concept。Great Judicial Concept，It means various departments、Industry、Social Organization、Grass -roots governance units shall participate in the source governance of social contradictions and disputes。Under this concept，Data barriers between departments should be eliminated as much as possible，and gradually expand the content and range of the sharing of the source data。For example，The integration of various contradictions and resolution platforms can be promoted from top to bottom at the provincial level，Promoting the Court of Judicial Big Data and Social Security Comprehensive Management Center、Contradiction Mediation Center、Public Legal Service Center、Non -Public Security Center and other digital platforms fusion，Gradually improve the "Internet+Source Governance" mode。At the same time，On the basis of summing up some court's online multi -solution platform operation experience，Gradually refine relevant rules，Summarize the use of the promotion of online multiple solution platforms。

On the other hand，To improve the use rules of the diverse solution digital platform，Build an inclusive and shared network judicial space。The court can jointly introduce the relevant system incentive mechanism with multiple departments，Integrate the gathering of resource solutions to all parties，Mobilization of social subjects of all parties actively participated in the construction of online multiple solution platforms，and when using a diverse solution to the digital platform，The right to choose the right to respect the parties is the fundamental，Refined to set the online mediation time limit、Related procedures for non -connection procedures and other related procedures。At the structure of the internal program，The court should also be based on the nature of different contradictions and disputes，Further refine and improve the rules of online justice。At the same time，Some groups of digital literacy in the main body of diverse solution and the digital gap that may exist、Digital discrimination and other problems，To promote grass -roots community organizations to support some groups to access network judicial space，Construct a soft environment for digital governance and sharing，Application scenarios and crowd access scope of digital solution as much as possible，In -depth advancement from digital to "digital rule"。

(Author Unit: School of Political Science and Law, Jiangxi Normal University)