This newspaper comprehensive foreign media report recently，The British Physical Society Press published the "Report on the Type Review of 2024"。This report brings a questionnaire survey of 3046 peer review experts around the world，In -depth revealing the number of invitations for reviewers、Work attitude、Participating motivation and other aspects of differences due to different regional and career stages。

Since the British Physical Society Press released the "Motivation Report of the 2020 Examination of the Examples in 2020"，The field of global peer review has undergone significant changes。On the one hand，The new crown epidemic has changed the working environment and cooperation model of the researcher; on the other hand,，The number of colleagues in scientific research papers continues to rise。other，Genesis artificial intelligence Bet365 app download brings new opportunities and new challenges to academic writing。The increase in the number of withdrawals and academic misconduct pose a threat to the academic system based on trust。Laura Feetham-Walker, Manager of the British Institute of Physics Press, said，High -quality peer review is important for maintaining science's integrity and effectiveness，and this requires full power、The joint efforts of the reviewer who actively participate in and have the ability to provide constructive feedback。The "Report on the Type of the 2024" is designed to explore the status quo of the peer review of the global academic community，and is committed to improving the inclusiveness and quality of the evaluation process。

About half of the interviewed experts said，The number of peer review invitations they received in the last three years has increased，Only 11.5%of the interviewed experts said the number of invitations was reduced。According to the results of the Standard analysis of the unique income group of the World Bank, you Bet365 lotto review will be discovered，Interviewed experts from low -income countries are more likely to report the number of invitations increase，accounting for 77%。In recent years，The academic publishing industry has paid more and more attention to the incorporation of researchers in low -income and middle -income countries into the evaluation process。Low -income national colleagues review expert received the number of review invitations increased，This may mean that inclusive measures are getting results。

From the comparison of the time for the experts interviewed to evaluate the work and the number of invitations received，84%of the interviewed experts said，The working time they received by the review invitations they received is less than the total time that can be used for evaluation work，Either match with your own time arrangement。Comparison of comparison，In the survey of 2020，The proportion of interviewed experts in the same situation is 74%。This change may mean that the pressure of peer evaluation work is reduced as a whole，It may also mean that bet365 Play online games the group of experts who have been invited to peer reviews have changed，Then the differences of the composition of the experts interviewed by two investigations。

Compared with the past，Researchers have little motivation for receiving reviewing invitations.，The interest in related papers and the reputation of the journal are still the decisive factor。Reporting to recommend that publishers should carefully match the appropriate papers based on the academic expertise and interest of the potential reviewers，Abide by strict peer review standards，to ensure the active participation of the group of manuscripts。Similar to the situation in 2020，Experts interviewed hoping to get feedback in the process of peer review，The final decision on whether the thesis manuscript is hired is the most popular option。Experts interviewed also said，Receiving feedback on the quality of evaluation is also a potential incentive factors。

Fisham Walker and other researchers also invited the experts interviewed to evaluate the measures bet365 live casino games and innovations that may have positive impact on peer evaluations。where，"Improvement of Manuscript and Evaluation Online Submission System" is considered the most valuable improvement measure。Following "strengthen the author、Communication between the reviewer and the editor "and" Provide higher quality and be able to reach the same peer review training "。Since the investigation in 2020，The importance of "Provide higher quality and can be more accessible" of peer review and training has been significantly improved in the minds of the experts interviewed。

"Report on the Type of 2024" also shows，The academic community has differences in the views of how the generation artificial intelligence will affect the future of peer evaluation。About 35%of the interviewed experts think，Generating artificial intelligence may have negative or very negative effects on peer reviews。At the same time，About 29%of the interviewed experts expect it to bring positive or very positive effects，About 36%of the bet365 Play online games interviewed experts believe that its impact will be neutral or unprecedented。other，Use the generated artificial intelligence to write or supplement the peer review report，It has also caused a lot of ethical concerns，Including protection of data、Confidentiality issues and concerns about the authenticity and accuracy of the evaluation report。

(Liu Yuwei/Compilation)