bet365 best casino games Recently，The official website of the Annenberg Public Policy Center at the University of Pennsylvania said，Discovered through investigation，The public’s general perception of scholars’ competence、Reliability and values ​​are recognized to the same extent。Although between 2023 and 2024，These values ​​are slightly down。In addition，There is a difference between the public’s recognition of scholars engaged in artificial intelligence research and the recognition of scholars in other disciplines。

　2018 to 2022，The Annenberg Public Policy Center at the University of Pennsylvania relies on national cross-sectional surveys to capture public Bet365 app download views on science and academics，2023 to 2024，Turn to a more nationally representative sample to observe trends in public opinion。

Based on data from 2018 to 2022，Researchers isolate factors that influence public perception of academics，And constructed “Factors Assessing Science’s Self-Presentation，FASS for short) model，Including whether the scholar is reputable、Whether it is prudent、Can you overcome your own prejudices、Is it capable of self-correction，And whether the scholar’s ​​work benefits the public and the country as a whole。

In FASS model，The evaluation of a scholar’s ​​credibility is determined by three dimensions，Respectively, whether the professional ability is excellent、Whether it is trustworthy and consistent with the respondent’s values。Prudence means that scholars should be responsible for their own research、Adhere to the Code of Ethical Research bet365 best casino games Conduct，Evaluation of prudence is measured by whether the scholar has a sense of superiority and whether he or she will do whatever it takes to obtain funding and publish articles。The principles of neutrality and impartiality should be observed during scientific research，This requires scholars to be impartial、The ability to overcome one’s own biases，The evaluation of this section consists of the scholar’s ​​ability to draw fair conclusions and overcome biases。The assessment of self-correction consists of three dimensions，Include whether peer review can detect errors in the study、Are scholars responsible for their own mistakes，And when misconduct is discovered，Whether remedial measures should be taken to prevent recurrence。Whether scientific research results are beneficial is closely related to the welfare of national taxpayers，Perceptions bet365 Play online games of the benefits of science can influence how well research is funded，This aspect is assessed by whether it benefits the country and whether it benefits the respondent itself。The FASS model can be used to track the gap between scholars’ self-identity and actual public perception，It helps us identify areas for corrective action or better communication。In addition，The FASS model also predicts how well science is funded。

Researchers found，Among the three dimensions of assessing scholar credibility，Two dimensions will show a downward trend from 2023 to 2024，That is, professional ability and trustworthiness。In 2023-2024 data，70% of the respondents strongly agree or somewhat agree that scholars are more competent，Lower than survey data from 2018 to 2022；59% of the respondents strongly agree or somewhat agree that scholars are trustworthy，Lower than survey data from 2018 to 2022。

The investigation also found，Compare data from 2018 to 2022，The number bet365 Play online games of people who believe that scholars’ research results are beneficial to the public and the country is decreasing in the 2023-2024 data，Only 66% of the public strongly agree or somewhat agree that scientific research discoveries are beneficial to the country。The public’s recognition of artificial intelligence scholars is lower than other scholars，This is because of public opinion，Although scholars who study artificial intelligence are capable，But there are differences with the public’s values。

Researchers said，Although scholars are more recognized by the public，But they have concerns about research in the field of artificial intelligence。This finding is not surprising，Because generative artificial intelligence is an emerging field of scientific research，It is full of great hope，At the same time, there are also greater potential dangers。

(Lian Zhixian/Compiled)